Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-11-2012, 12:32 PM   #211 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The definition of "sports car" has changed since 1957. A link from the link above MOTOR test table shows 0-60mph time of 10 seconds. I think a modern Minivan would outrun and perhaps out handle it. as this article here points out Soccer Moms' Revenge: Grassroots Motorsports Magazine Articles


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2012, 05:18 AM   #212 (permalink)
Absent without leave.
 
Arragonis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Englishman living in Scotland
Posts: 3,365

George - '011 Aygo Go!
Team m8
90 day: 54.54 mpg (US)

Mildred - '011 Prius T-Spirit
90 day: 45.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 168
Thanked 250 Times in 187 Posts
0-60 in 10 seconds when you are about 6 inches off the floor is plenty sporty for me, plus of course Minivans take the unscientific (dumb ?) route to performance of most modern cars - bigger engine and more POWAH instead of efficient design.

As for outhandling - comparing a minivan to 2 cars both of which have acknowledge handling issues (engine at the wrong end, too narrow track & soft springs) is not really fair.

Lotus XIs and the Westfield clones have been happily mixing it with purpose built racing machinery on the track for decades.
__________________
No longer here. Bye, and good luck to all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2012, 12:59 PM   #213 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,651
Thanks: 31
Thanked 237 Times in 171 Posts
You also have to figure in all the improved technology which could be put in a Lotus XI-type car. Notice little comments in that motor article about carburetors (carburetors?!?!) without chokes (Daddy, what's a choke?), an engine that doesn't consume much oil (nowadays I put 2.5 quarts in my Insight at an oil change, and take out about 2.49 quarts 7500 miles later).

Suppose you build a Lotus XI clone using modern technology: what sort of performance & fuel economy would you expect? Even the current Lotus cars, over-engined as they are, score near the top of the annual CAFE stats.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2012, 07:21 PM   #214 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JackMcCornack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 151
Thanks: 4
Thanked 26 Times in 15 Posts
> I have a hard time believing any ICE car could acheive 40mpg at LeMans.

I researched that question myself recently, it does sound pretty incredible (as in: not credible). I believe the error comes from MOTOR magazine testing mileage with Imperial gallons, which are 20% larger than US gallons. So how 'bout 30mpg at Le Mans? The Lotus 11 that won the 1957 Index of Performance is alleged to have done slightly better than that with a 750cc motor.

Mind you, the '50s were the last hurrah of streamlined road racing cars (by the early '60s, road racing was all about downforce and horsepower) and that car was aiming specifically at winning the IoP (where fuel economy was the major factor), but still, it couldn't win the IoP if it didn't finish, and to count as a finisher a car had to go at least 70% as far as the overall winner...so they weren't exactly hypermiling.

> I think a modern Minivan would outrun and perhaps out handle it...

The first Lotus 11s weren't all that great handling, but they got better.

> ...as this article here points out

It also points out that they put replica antique tires on the Porsche 356 ("...period-correct 165R15 Michelin XZX tires sourced from Coker Tire...") and upgraded the Honda Minivan with $1100 worth of tires and wheels to improve traction. Putting a set of Goodyear Advantage Fuel Max tires and Drag DR-9 wheels on MAX made it considerably more autocross-friendly.
__________________
Modding MAX, a Kubota-powered classic sports car
http://www.kineticvehicles.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 12:00 PM   #215 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JackMcCornack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 151
Thanks: 4
Thanked 26 Times in 15 Posts
I put a flat diffuser plate under the rear axle and fuel tank. It seems to have helped (I didn't do ABBA testing, but then again, I didn't break the 100 mpg @ 55 mph barrier until I added this diffuser) but with the sharp 6 degree edge where it hits the cockpit, and the hole for the diff to droop through, it's still pretty turbulent. See for yourself.



However, air never stays laminar after it's been drug under a car, and I think there will be diminishing returns from here on out. Do you think a curved diffuser with a gentle transition from the horizontal belly of the cockpit would be worth the effort?
__________________
Modding MAX, a Kubota-powered classic sports car
http://www.kineticvehicles.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 12:30 PM   #216 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
nemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 181

Chief - '06 Grand Prix Base
90 day: 24.38 mpg (US)

Not Mine - '012 Fiesta S
Thanks: 14
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Another question would be how much the downstream camera affected the tuft test. The camera and mount appear to be centered, in direct line with the cut out for differential, try offsetting it and see if you get different results.
__________________


There are no answers. Only more questions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 01:16 PM   #217 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,268

Appliance White - '93 Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Sprint Base
Thanks: 43
Thanked 144 Times in 109 Posts
I'd have to see pics or drawings of the current area to be covered by the curved piece proposed, but there should always be a curved transition to any afterbody surface. Laminar is usually impossible, but attached flow is still very good to achieve.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 06:14 PM   #218 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,975
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 807 Times in 469 Posts
diffuser angle

I've no data on diffusers other than what Hucho published,or the original sources he used.These all have just a simple angle,although I was given to understand that 4-degrees was the maximum upward slope angle which would guarantee attached flow.
Since the tufts are 'flying' a bit,rather than attempting to polish the surface of the diffuser,it would appear that the boundary layer is somewhat compromised under there with eddy flow underway.The tufts do mostly point to the rear so there's no apparent recirculation,so she's helping.
Love the camera work! These images are as good as anything coming out of a world-class wind tunnel.Thanks!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
aero mods-data-% change or Cd change ( installment # 7-Wheels/Tires/Wheelcovers/etc. aerohead Aerodynamics 4 08-31-2011 07:45 AM
Mercedes aero engineer: Cd of .20 feasible in production cars within 10 yrs MetroMPG Aerodynamics 37 02-28-2011 05:43 PM
CRV Cross Country Trip Aero - Temporary Aero Just for the Trip walteraxe Aerodynamics 26 01-05-2010 11:37 AM
Another Autospeed aero article: methods for measuring aero drag Daox Aerodynamics 4 02-14-2008 12:34 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com