Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-21-2011, 11:26 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: England
Posts: 15
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Low rolling (eco) tyres VS overinflation

What are the relative gains of low rolling resistance (LRR) tyres versus over-inflation of standard tyres?

i.e. is it really worth the extra cost of LRR tyres, or will high PSI in standard tyres do the same thing?

The thing is, my usual Uniroyal Rainsport 2 tyres are great in every other respect (especially wet stopping) but they are only average on rolling resistance. If I pump them up hard, does that make them as good at rolling as LRR tyres???

It looks like LRR tyres are lacking in other (important) areas (like grip!), as always there are many trade-offs going on.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 11:43 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,674

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 54.91 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
I dunno about over by you, but the LRR choices here don't really cost anymore than other tires.

To answer your question though, yes its still important. I don't have a link handy, but it was a TireRack article that said that 2/3rds of the rolling resistance of a tire come from the tread itself (design and material) where 1/3rd comes from sidewall flexing (which air pressure helps negate). So, buying LRR tires is still quite important.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
silverinsight2 (07-23-2011)
Old 07-21-2011, 02:44 PM   #3 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,877

Svietlana - '05 307 SW
Diesel
90 day: 55.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 668
Thanked 361 Times in 229 Posts
Imagine where overinflating LRR tires would get you...
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell

Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 05:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
micman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 25

Scarlet - '04 Aveo LS
90 day: 35.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
On a related note, is it more dangerous over-inflating LRR tires than sporty or all weather tires? Will it cause more blowouts?

I agree LRR tires aren't more expensive. I think the reduced grip can be compensated for with reduced speed, thus negating any negative effects from unforeseen road events. In other words, don't buy LRR tires for road raging.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 07:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: houston
Posts: 358

Black Knight - '94 Corolla
Team Toyota
90 day: 61.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 30 Times in 25 Posts
dont road rage for MPG
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2011, 05:41 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,956

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat View Post
What are the relative gains of low rolling resistance (LRR) tyres versus over-inflation of standard tyres?
I got about 7% out of the Michelin Energy Savers.
I already ran my previous tyres at somewhat higher than placard-pressure and continued that with the Energy Savers.

At 7%, given their long lifetime, and despite the elevated Michelin prices, it's still a good deal over time.

If you want to get them for their fuel efficiency, get the tyres that are best at reduced RR.
Not all tyres labeled as LRR actually are.
Check out the tests by ADAC and the like.

For saving fuel, in 2009/2010 the best were the Energy Saver and the Goodyear Efficientgrip - the newer stuff might do better, but no guarantees.

Quote:
i.e. is it really worth the extra cost of LRR tyres,
Depends on your goal.
If you want to go for cheaper tyres , the lower price of the normal tyre may offset the gain in fuel economy. You'd have to compromise on endurance or grip as well .

At 7% less fuel and long endurance, LRR fit the bill for me.


Quote:
or will high PSI in standard tyres do the same thing?
Partly.
But higher inflation on a LRR tyre will improve the fuel economy as well.

I can't single out the effect of higher pressure on my fuel use as too much has changed simultaneously.

Quote:
The thing is, my usual Uniroyal Rainsport 2 tyres are great in every other respect (especially wet stopping) but they are only average on rolling resistance. If I pump them up hard, does that make them as good at rolling as LRR tyres???
Not likely to happen.


Quote:
It looks like LRR tyres are lacking in other (important) areas (like grip!), as always there are many trade-offs going on.
I've usually been running better, sportier stuff than the Uniroyals.
(think Michelin Pilot series, Conti sportcontact 3, ...)

Going to the Energy Savers was quite a leap of faith, but they've held up well. (Mine are W rated though, yet I only need T.)


If you change your mindset and driving style, good LRR tyres will certainly do, despite their shortcomings / different compromises.
Compared to a sporty tyre, you do lose grip and braking performance, so you should be prepared to compensate for that in your driving.

It's all part of changing the nut behind the wheel
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :

Last edited by euromodder; 07-22-2011 at 04:50 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2011, 06:55 AM   #7 (permalink)
toc
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 102

Sonata97 - '97 Sonata GL
90 day: 25.96 mpg (US)

Pulsar - '03 Pulsar ST
Team Nissan
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
It's all part of changing the nut behind the wheel
I'm still trying to find the right spanner for that nut.

Here in Aus, I'm trying to find which LRR are the best. So far I've only come up with Michelin XM1+

Any good, or are there better that I should actively seek?

I'll be running them around half way between placard and max sidewall.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2011, 08:55 PM   #8 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern CT, USA
Posts: 1,074

Lean Burn Civic - '97 Civic HX
Team Honda
90 day: 51.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 87 Times in 63 Posts
Lower tire pressure will cause blowout. Sidewall flexes too much and is weakened. I saw it happen on a family member's car. Owner never paid any attention to tire pressure and one blew out the sidewall. Checked the others and they were all in the 20's psi.

I'm currently running Kumho eco Solus, sidewall imprint 44 psi (supposedly a LRR tire). They were at 55 psi before the average temp here went up another 15 degrees or so. I'm scared to check the pressure now, probably 56-57 psi. I drive 600 miles weekly and have about 6 months on them now.

My winter tires are Michelin X-Ice II, rated 51 psi. I run them at 55 also. I was very impressed that I only lost about 1 mpg when I put them on last winter, vs. the Kumhos that first went on early in the previous fall. I was also impressed by how well they gripped ice. Don't know if you get any of that where you are though!
__________________
Check your tire pressure - keep it up !!

We've learned that diet has a closer relationship to cancer than we ever thought. Please see this Wikipedia article on The China Study.

Driving Lean Burn '97 Civic HX, lotsa mods by now! '89 Volvo 240 is semi-retired. I did love that car though!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2011, 11:53 PM   #9 (permalink)
Driving the TurboWeasel
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Steuben County, NY
Posts: 458
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
A lot of good LRR tires can be had for the same price as non-LRR tires. Some of the better LRR tires can out-perform regular tires while still offering LRR benefits.

Besides, if you're plunking down $400-500 on a set of tires, an extra $30-50 for LRR tires darn well ought to be recouped a couple times over in gas savings. One will notice the large hit first, while the much smaller savings amounts will be lost in the shuffle.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco 6MT
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com