Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-24-2011, 09:45 PM   #1 (permalink)
V8 guy
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico
Posts: 632

Sub - '84 Suburban C10
Pickups

camaro - '85 Camaro Z28
Thanks: 8
Thanked 47 Times in 42 Posts
Low tension oil rings

This was for a diesel build, forget about using them in a gasser.

There were doubts even by me.
It turns out you dont need "standard tension" oil rings in a diesel (I consider them standard friction oil rings now). Its mainly to keep the the oil out of the combustion chamber in engines that draw a lot of vacuum like the gassers, this was the only reason I found for really needing to have them. I never could find a good reason why they were needed in a no vacuum N/A or turbo diesel.

I had my doubts when the brand new engine consumed a little over a quart of oil with in the first 500 miles of highway driving.
Then the next 1,700 miles it didn't consume any oil as far as I could tell.
I am sure the valve seals I installed helped too.

The standard tension oil rings pack 20 to 25 pounds of spring force when installed. Since I dont have the fancy oil ring spring tension gauge I reduced the spring length until the tension felt as if it was reduced to between 1/4 to 1/3 what it started out as. I was going for about 7 pounds and no less than 5 pounds of spring. Then after I got the first oil ring the way I wanted it, from there on it was only a matter of cutting the other oil ring springs down to the same length. (I took about 3/8'' off them)

Why reduce oil ring tension?
Less friction, more power to the wheels, easier to crank the engine over when cold and better fuel economy.
A side by side comparason with low tension oil rings Vs. standard showed the low tension oil ringed piston was much easier to push and pull up and down the cylinder bore by hand.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L high compression diesel.
New engine is in and should be good for 29mpg highway.
1985 chevy camaro mostly stock.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (11-24-2011)
Old 11-24-2011, 10:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Funny you just posted that, as I'd been thinking about 2-ring packs, extra-skinny rings, and low tension ring packs lately. I've been meaning to research the Metro XFi 2-ring system to see if I could incorporate that theory into some of my gassers.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 03:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
V8 guy
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico
Posts: 632

Sub - '84 Suburban C10
Pickups

camaro - '85 Camaro Z28
Thanks: 8
Thanked 47 Times in 42 Posts
The problem with running low tension (about 5 to 10 pounds) or very low tension (3 to 5 pounds) with an engine that draws a strong vacuum is the possibility of increased oil consumption.
Gassers that do run low or very low tension usually run vacuum pumps (maintain no more than 8 to 10 inches of Hg).
There is a new dodge that runs low tension rings but the block has been engineered to maintain bore roundness through heating cycles and many thousands of miles of driving.

The only way we can get close to that engeering is to have your block machined while torqued with a deck plate, mains torqued and block heated to near operating temperature.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L high compression diesel.
New engine is in and should be good for 29mpg highway.
1985 chevy camaro mostly stock.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 06:23 AM   #4 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 579

Princess - '92 MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
90 day: 33.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 113 Times in 79 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Maybe moving the restriction on PCV could increase the vacuum in the block on a gasser, and make it more suitable for lower tension oil rings.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________



Remember, even if you win the rat race - you're still a rat.

2010: 454.92L for 5313.90km => 8.56L/100km (27.5MPG US) (5 months)
2011: 606.11L for 7754.04km => 7.82L/100km (30.1MPG US) (Full year)
2012: 170.10L for 2405.00km => 7.07L/100km (33.3MPG US) (In progress)
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com