Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

View Poll Results: What rolls better: RE92's @ 51 psi or donuts @ 70 psi?
Donuts 6 40.00%
RE92's 7 46.67%
Trick question: they're identical! 2 13.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-10-2011, 08:55 PM   #11 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,533

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,019 Times in 568 Posts
To help visualize just HOW bad the donuts were compared to the RE92's (which henceforth shall be known as the Tires Of The Gods), a photo with the car at actual starting & stopping points:



I used a big parking lot that's empty on weekends. The starting "hill" isn't huge - maybe a couple of feet elevation change where the entrance/exit goes up to meet the road grade.

But it was enough of a slope that the car rolled ...

  • 216.9 feet on the RE92's @ 51 psi (average of 5 runs).
  • 155 feet on the donuts @ 70 psi (average of 2 runs).
  • just 138.8 feet (!!) on the donuts @ 51 psi (average of 3 runs).


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
1337 (10-17-2011), Vekke (10-13-2011)
Old 10-10-2011, 09:25 PM   #12 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
...the numbers don't lie...but, the people cussing & discussing them might (ha,ha)
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 11:36 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Florida, USA
Posts: 450

Hot Tamale - '010 Prius III
Thanks: 15
Thanked 64 Times in 51 Posts
Is it possible that the spares are bias-ply instead of radial? That would help to explain their poor performance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 02:34 PM   #14 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
I drove the tempo on 4 donuts once while refinishing the stock wheels. I did have the distinct impression that rr and ride were poor vs stock- unfortunately, did no roll test tho'.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2012, 02:43 AM   #15 (permalink)
eph
EcoModding Lurker
 
eph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: canada
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodak View Post
I'm going with the Potenzas for a few reasons.

I know that tire pressure increases help rr with diminishing returns, and 51 is already pretty high.

Secondly, I think CapriRacer said that wider can be better for rr: Barry's Tire Tech, rolling resistance part 2

I'm also assuming that the donut spare is built heavy-duty, and that you won't be going fast enough for the improved aero of the skinnier tire to matter much.

But now you got me curious.
nah the artical is B.S sorry to say i run spares in the back all year around and first off, they last up to a year long and i pay 10 bucks each from the wreckers for them so thats 20 bucks per year cost driving can not be beat, Second* i use them in winter and believe it or not they are the best tire ive ever used they cut right threw the snow and ice, they are great in mud also, adn third if you dont believe me just watch this link Video: Can Skinnier Tires Increase Fuel Economy?

no cussing this is the truth right here just watch the vid i run these tires alll year around and no problems and i my self have calculated 4 mpg inrease and able to coste almost twice as long in neutral

yes youn are right watch this vid, this tells the truth


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com