Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-17-2011, 10:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
FPO
.
 
FPO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Home
Posts: 27

05GT - '05 Mustang GT
90 day: 27.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lowering Springs?

If I were to lower my car 1.5 to 2 inches, what impact would it have on FE?

Hardly noticeable?
Noticeable?

What does everybody think?

I do not like the look of it stock, so I am thinking of dropping it a little.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2011, 10:23 PM   #2 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Search for the many threads we have on this.

Short answer is it's supposed to help but it will probably be so little you can't detect it. That was my experience. I still like the mod though.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 01:15 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Modesto
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It depends on how low your vehicle already is.
For example, if you've got a truck a foot off the ground, two inches probably isn't going to do much at all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 09:25 AM   #4 (permalink)
FPO
.
 
FPO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Home
Posts: 27

05GT - '05 Mustang GT
90 day: 27.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
it's the car in my sig

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 12:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 2,878

honda cb125 - '74 CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Civic VX
Thanks: 389
Thanked 222 Times in 191 Posts
I did that on my civic for a few years then changed it back because the ride was really rough and I found that my suspension bushings were all wearing out much faster, I ended up changing it back to stock and I haven't had to replace any suspension parts in the last 3 years.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ryland For This Useful Post:
kurzer (01-19-2012), mcrews (03-23-2012), PaleMelanesian (11-18-2011)
Old 11-18-2011, 04:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
Efficiency Aficionado
 
CigaR007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Province of Québec
Posts: 459

GreenTurtle - '01 Echo Sedan
90 day: 42.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 107
Thanked 75 Times in 62 Posts
I believe that when lowering your car, you have to invest in a good set of shocks and springs. Changing only the oem springs will not provide an optimal compromise between comfort and handling. I will most likely reduce the tire pressure from 40 psi to 35 psi once the suspension upgrade will be done.

I intend to keep my car for another 5+ years, so the investment is justified in my case.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 04:17 PM   #7 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Have you done it before?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 06:30 PM   #8 (permalink)
FPO
.
 
FPO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Home
Posts: 27

05GT - '05 Mustang GT
90 day: 27.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not sure if you are referring to me Frank,
but yes I had put H&R cup kit on my old svt focus, that thing sat LOW

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 06:54 PM   #9 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
No, shooda quoted 007. Talking about buying all this stuff without ever trying what I've done strikes me as, well, not as informed as should be for dispensing such advice.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 07:15 PM   #10 (permalink)
Efficiency Aficionado
 
CigaR007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Province of Québec
Posts: 459

GreenTurtle - '01 Echo Sedan
90 day: 42.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 107
Thanked 75 Times in 62 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
No, shooda quoted 007. Talking about buying all this stuff without ever trying what I've done strikes me as, well, not as informed as should be for dispensing such advice.
How about sharing what you have done instead of bashing me ? I merely said that in my opinion, lowering your car is something to be done properly and that it requires an investment. OE shock absorbers were not designed to withstand stiffer springs and they will fail prematurely or in the least not be as efficient as they should be.

My point is, if your shocks and struts are rather old and that they will need replacement eventually, perhaps investing in a superior set along with the lowering springs could prove to be beneficial in terms of comfort, handling and perhaps provide a small aero benefit.

As I have said earlier, I intend to keep my car for a long time, and such investment is justified in my case. I trust that people are mature enough to make their own judgment and take my comments with a grain of salt.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CigaR007 For This Useful Post:
capnbass91 (11-19-2011)
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com