Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2009, 12:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 827

The Van - '97 Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Max - '98 Maxima SE
90 day: 21.12 mpg (US)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
Making a minivan more aerodynamic.

Bit of a newbie here, so excuse any newbie comments.

My '97 Mercury Villager would seem to have the perfect recipe for an economical car; it's decently streamlined, has a smaller v-6 with overdrive made by Nissan, and it is more compact than most vans. But it weighs in at nearly 2 tons (between 3800-4000) and despite using hypermiling techniques, we can barely get past 22 mpg in mixed driving.

It has a drag coefficient of .35, which doesn't seem terrifically terrible, but i suspect can be improved on. My first order of business is a belly pan, I think, but I'm having to argue with my wife about anything that can be seen. I've convinced her that a partial kammack wouldn't be too bad--Toyota's Prius has one, as do a lot of newer cars. But I'm not convinced that a part kammack will work unless it becomes a bit large.

While looking at the Prius, I noticed what looks like an air dam in the rear. Suppose it's like a part kammack for the under car air flow? Playing with the airflow video tool showed that a part kammack on top and bottom would seem to help some, but my guess would be they would have to stick out about 2 foot from the rear of the van. Don't know if the wife would appreciate that much. I might get away with it if I make the bottom kammack sturdy enough to strap a cooler to.

Something else I confirmed with the airflow video; a minivan is quite a bit more efficient going in reverse than going forward. In reverse, the hood would act as a kammack, and the video shows the airflow being much smoother. Too bad that mod was so difficult to do.......

thoughts?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2009, 07:52 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 204

- - '010 Prius III w/Navi
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Hi ShadeTree...,

Wheel dams would be a good add-on. Also, take a look at the new Chrysler minivan. It has a little extension off the back rear of the box.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2009, 09:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,232

Zombie Insight - '00 Insight MT
Team Honda
90 day: 62.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 236 Times in 172 Posts
Stand up to the wife! Start with the underbelly and gap seals, then add an attractive (black or clear plastic) partial grille block, and maybe someday she'll let you install some rear wheel skirts.

She should be proud to drive a vehicle competently modded by her husband. If she can explain the reasons for the ecomods to her friends, she shouldn't worry about being seen driving it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 05:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,607
Thanks: 870
Thanked 636 Times in 372 Posts
wife

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
Stand up to the wife! Start with the underbelly and gap seals, then add an attractive (black or clear plastic) partial grille block, and maybe someday she'll let you install some rear wheel skirts.

She should be proud to drive a vehicle competently modded by her husband. If she can explain the reasons for the ecomods to her friends, she shouldn't worry about being seen driving it.
You could tell her that she can tell her friends you'll be buying her a very large diamond with the savings on fuel.She might get so excited,she buys you some power tools!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 06:25 PM   #5 (permalink)
Slow and easy
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 509

Josie - '87 Pickup
90 day: 30 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Rear wheel skirts would be a great addition. If you have any kind of bodywork skill at all, it shouldn't be too hard to prime and color the skirts once you've got them made. Do a nice job and they'll look almost factory - and when you hit that state, you know who sees the mods? Guys. If it looks factory, 99.44% of all women will never ever notice it.

Under your van is a topographical nightmare. A bellypan is totally invisible, but will yield real results.
__________________

You're not in front of me...
I'm 25,000 miles in front of you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 04:26 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: belgium
Posts: 663

vectra a - '95 Vectra GLS
90 day: 37.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 46 Times in 32 Posts
i'd say work from the front to the back. investigate a grillblock perhaps a wiper shield as the hood looks as though it would lead the air right into the wipers... not a disaster, but things can always be smoother.

a front understray and wheeldams are also quite easy and effective, but a small airdam can work too

a kammback would work too and it wouldn't have to be all that big, it could take the form of a custom spoiler with side fairings

like this for example
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 07:22 PM   #7 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 827

The Van - '97 Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Max - '98 Maxima SE
90 day: 21.12 mpg (US)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
ok, air dam vs belly pan........

a belly pan is heavier, but there is no doubt in anyone's mind that it would reduce drag and reduce the amount of road noise.

An air dam is much lighter, but I could see how it would be less certain whether it does any good

has anyone compared air dams to belly pans?

ps that part kamm on the corsa is severly sweet

[/I]I need to do some research on wheel dams
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 07:32 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: belgium
Posts: 663

vectra a - '95 Vectra GLS
90 day: 37.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 46 Times in 32 Posts
airdam vs bellypan depends on how bad the underside is and how big the actual bellypan can be...fairing over the entire bottom will obviously beat a small strip underneath the bumper, but can be difficult or impossible to pull off... since the engine compartment is the main problem, fairing over most of the engine bay is a good start, provided everything beyond that is somewhat clean. on the other hand a well designed airdam is also good and can improve over the stock situation. It doesn't make the air disappear however so it'll have to push it somewhere else... a to big an airdam can be a source of drag itself, some of the better airdams are lower in front of the tires and curved to the side to guide the air around the vehicle, and a little higher in the center so they allow the air to go easier under neath (where it would end up anyway)

for inspiration you could look at more modern vehicles and see how low their bumper/airdams go and how they're shaped.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 09:16 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,261

Appliance White - '93 Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Sprint Base
Thanks: 43
Thanked 139 Times in 105 Posts
Most air dams are intended for down force as much or more as for drag reduction. The consensus seems to be that if you have substantial ground clearance, it is definitely better to use a belly pan and leave the frontal area alone.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2009, 12:07 AM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Would the "custom spoiler with side fairings" be very effective? (As shown in the little blue Corsa pictured above.)

From what I just read on Kammback on Wikipedia is that the tail area has to reach about 50% of the car's maximum cross section to maximize the effect. But hey that might be purists speaking - whereas even a 20-25% effectiveness on a minivan might make it worthwhile.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aerodynamic Heavy-Duty Truck Trailer Cuts Fuel Consumption and Emissions By Up to 15% SVOboy Aerodynamics 11 12-27-2011 08:18 AM
Fuel Economy related papers tasdrouille General Efficiency Discussion 31 01-18-2011 11:48 AM
Sources of Aerodynamic Drag in Automobiles and Possible Solutions SVOboy Aerodynamics 12 02-17-2010 03:09 PM
help on making fiberglass molds achang1 Aerodynamics 9 09-26-2009 03:09 PM
Making my own A pillar pods, how should I adhere these? Chris D. DIY / How-to 15 04-23-2008 06:30 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com