Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register
Now


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2008, 11:32 AM   #1 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 3,776

Vegan Powa! - '91 CRX DX
90 day: 57.2 mpg (US)
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy Send a message via Skype™ to SVOboy
More doubt thrown at the chevy volt

From ABG:

Quote:
Although the target launch date is still over two years away and there haven't been any major hitches, some consultants are expressing doubts that the GM Volt program will end in success. The "experts" to which I refer are members of the Gerson Lehrman Group Automotive Council who conducted an analysis of a Reuters story that appeared on the MSNBC website detailing the efforts and progress of the Volt program.

The most critical of the four assessments (two of which lie behind a subscription service and whose tone can only be estimated to be positive and mixed by their given report titles) was written by Mark Fendley who is the "Continuous Improvement Manager at BMW Manufacturing in Spartanburg, South Carolina" and has been with that company since 1998 according to the GLG website. His report, titled, "The Volt - GM's Attempt at Green Marketing without the Green Product or the Green Return," contends that the battery technology behind the plug-in hybrid (PHEV) is too unproven, environmentally destructive, and expensive to "ensure a 2010 launch." No sources are given to bolster the environmental claims in the article. Also unmentioned, unfortunately, are any details of the battery tech an all-electric car his employer is rumored may produce.

The other viewable report, written by Michael Kowalski (described as a self-employed consultant who is an adjunct professor at Wayne State University and who worked for GM as a staff engineer from 1970 until 2002) is titled, "Can the General Motors Volt meet the expectations?" and is a little less hysterical in tone. He does make sobering mention of GM's diesel engine "experiment" in the '80s and outlines some of that company's other efforts to develop alternative drivetrains. Although we can't say we completely agree with his analysis, especially as it pertains to GM using nickel metal-hydride as a battery chemistry it could fall back on, it does make for an interesting read. We look forward to reading analysis from our own experts (i.e., our readers) in the comments section following this post.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________



------------------------------EcoModder Gear------------------------------

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 07:27 PM   #2 (permalink)
02 Golf TDI Driver
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Scott, La
Posts: 877

The Golf - '02 Golf GLS TDI
90 day: 54.79 mpg (US)

Mongoose - '05 E-bike AWD
90 day: 1810.34 mpg (US)
Send a message via AIM to dremd
EV1 2.0

If they want to make it work, there is 0 doubt in my mind that they can. But it looks 2 me like they don't really care.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video: Weird chevy volt ad SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 10 09-18-2008 04:08 PM
2004-2008 Chevy Malibu (Review) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 6 07-20-2008 12:40 AM
Chevy Volt .Cd drops 30 % Cd Aerodynamics 8 03-16-2008 12:08 AM
Chevy Volt battery production starting in late 2009? SVOboy Fossil Fuel Free 9 03-04-2008 10:35 PM
Chevy Volt Commerical Lazarus The Lounge 21 01-14-2008 09:48 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
All content copyright EcoModder.com