Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Motorcycles / Scooters
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-30-2009, 01:51 PM   #11 (permalink)
Beta-tested it to death!
 
bennelson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oconomowoc, WI, USA
Posts: 3,763

Electric Cycle - '81 KZ440
90 day: 334.6 mpg (US)

Sunfire - '00 Sunfire
90 day: 26.44 mpg (US)

S10 - '95 S10
90 day: 30.48 mpg (US)

Electro-Metro - '96 "Electro-Metro"
90 day: 129.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 227 Times in 151 Posts
Yeah, I believe that when doing a series/parallel combination, most people do a single string (series) of PAIRS of batteries (parallel).

I can't be too sure about that though. I have seen maybe 10 cars converted to EV's and I think ALL of them were series battery arrangements.

But yeah, rule of thumb is higher system voltage is better. I can't wait to see Tom G.'s 300V Dodge Neon finished....


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________


300mpg.org Learn how to BUILD YOUR OWN ELECTRIC CAR CHEAP
My YouTube Videos
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 01:52 PM   #12 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,379

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 57.08 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 158
Thanked 366 Times in 254 Posts
Its always in your best interest to operate with all your batteries in series. The general rules, from what I heard are something like this. If you have a 100Ah battery, don't pull more than 80A (not sure if its 80% or lower) from it to maintain good battery life. If you have 12 of these 100Ah batteries, you can run 144V or 72V or 36V or whatever parallel setup you want. However, you'll want to limit current draw to a max of 960 amps (80% of 1200). 960A at 144V is a heck of a lot more power than 960A at 36V, and you don't sacrifice capacity or anything else to get more power. However, your components are just a lot more expensive.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 02:01 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,096

2k2Prot5 - '02 Protege5
90 day: 33.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Daox - keep in mind that if you are using parallel combos, the current FROM EACH battery is divided by the number of batteries in parallel.

So where 12 batteries in series can handle X current, 12 batteries in 4 3-battery strings, could handle 3X current.

They will also have a combined series resistance that is lower. So most definately, parallel batteries are going to provide you with the capacity to push more amps.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 02:18 PM   #14 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,379

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 57.08 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 158
Thanked 366 Times in 254 Posts
The current is always divided amongst how many batteries you have. If you have two batteries and are using 100A, you are pulling 50A from each battery. It doesn't matter if they are in series or parallel. You have two batteries that are splitting the amperage draw. In the series setup you will be getting twice the power and half the battery life. In the parallel setup you will get half the power, but twice the battery life.

Resistance is something to think about, but I think its fairly small when you figure in the bigger picture.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2009, 01:54 AM   #15 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,091

The Clunker - '90 Accord EX sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 29.49 mpg (US)

Uranus - '04 Ion 2 sedan
90 day: 38.21 mpg (US)

Mountain Goat - '96 Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab
90 day: 18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 50 Times in 40 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MazdaMatt View Post
Ben,

You say higher voltage makes for the same work at lower current. This is true, P=VA... but isn't the force generated by an electric motor ONLY proportional to current? If i recall correctly from electromagnetics class (way back), F=cAT (c is a constant, Amps, Turns).... (I'm really sketchy on the electromagnetics details).

Help
That's where the controller comes in. This is not technically quite correct, but by controlling the duty cycle, the controller essentially outputs high current at very low voltage at low RPMs, and outputs lower current at higher voltage at high RPMs, while drawing the same current/voltage at the battery.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 07:56 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
The Atomic Ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 498

2-Wheeled Mule - '06 Burgman 400
90 day: 84.89 mpg (US)

Max - '01 S-10 LS
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)

Twin Powa - '05 Ninja 250
90 day: 79.09 mpg (US)

Ransom - '01 Bravada
90 day: 16.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to The Atomic Ass
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
The current is always divided amongst how many batteries you have. If you have two batteries and are using 100A, you are pulling 50A from each battery. It doesn't matter if they are in series or parallel. You have two batteries that are splitting the amperage draw. In the series setup you will be getting twice the power and half the battery life. In the parallel setup you will get half the power, but twice the battery life.
That's actually incorrect. If you have 2 batteries in parallel, and you're pulling 100A at 12V, then you're pulling 50A from each battery. But if you have them in series, and you're pulling 100A at 24V, you're pulling 100A at 12V from each battery. In series your amperage draw per battery is always equal to your total pack draw, with the exception of cell imbalance.

Also, power is a meaningless term without context. The same number of batteries, wired any way you can think, should still output the same WATTS. Wired in series you get full VOLTAGE, wired in ONLY parallel you get full AMPERAGE. But you'll still get the same number of watts from the batteries.

Now, here's an idea no-one has seemed to hit on, at least in the grocery-getter field. How about having a pack normally wired for series, but center-tapped. Flick a switch on the dashboard, and several contactors switch over from series to 2 parallel packs. Half the voltage, double the amperage, and great for acceleration. As a matter of fact, the Killa-Cycle does just that, only on the motor side. The motors are run in series for one part, and parallel for the other part of the run, and I've forgotten which is which.
__________________

ASE certified day-dream engineer

I'm making beautiful music's now, hear it and like me on Facebook!

Last edited by The Atomic Ass; 02-08-2009 at 08:03 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 08:03 PM   #17 (permalink)
Beta-tested it to death!
 
bennelson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oconomowoc, WI, USA
Posts: 3,763

Electric Cycle - '81 KZ440
90 day: 334.6 mpg (US)

Sunfire - '00 Sunfire
90 day: 26.44 mpg (US)

S10 - '95 S10
90 day: 30.48 mpg (US)

Electro-Metro - '96 "Electro-Metro"
90 day: 129.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 227 Times in 151 Posts
Citicars, which are going on 40 years old, used a series/parallel configuration of batteries.



They used a set of contactors for basic speed control. Kind of loud (lots of clicking from those contactors) but they worked well.

About the only upside of that system was that they actually could pull pretty high amperage, and you could get some decent acceleration out of them.

Still better just to use a good PWM controller though.
__________________


300mpg.org Learn how to BUILD YOUR OWN ELECTRIC CAR CHEAP
My YouTube Videos

Last edited by bennelson; 02-08-2009 at 08:04 PM.. Reason: typo
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 08:08 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
The Atomic Ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 498

2-Wheeled Mule - '06 Burgman 400
90 day: 84.89 mpg (US)

Max - '01 S-10 LS
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)

Twin Powa - '05 Ninja 250
90 day: 79.09 mpg (US)

Ransom - '01 Bravada
90 day: 16.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to The Atomic Ass
I was thinking of a combination of the two. Have the parallel/series switch before the controller, and feed the controller full voltage for normal driving, and half-voltage when you need to GO!
__________________

ASE certified day-dream engineer

I'm making beautiful music's now, hear it and like me on Facebook!
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 08:26 PM   #19 (permalink)
Beta-tested it to death!
 
bennelson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oconomowoc, WI, USA
Posts: 3,763

Electric Cycle - '81 KZ440
90 day: 334.6 mpg (US)

Sunfire - '00 Sunfire
90 day: 26.44 mpg (US)

S10 - '95 S10
90 day: 30.48 mpg (US)

Electro-Metro - '96 "Electro-Metro"
90 day: 129.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 227 Times in 151 Posts
That somehow assumes that your amperage is somehow being limited by the batteries, NOT the controller.

Unless you are drag-racing or doing something else equally unusual, being able to pull more amperage from the batteries isn't going to help any, and having lower system voltage will drop your speed.

One "hybrid" system I have thought about before is to have contactors switch between the controller to the motor, and an extra-long series string of batteries straight to the motor.

Imagine you have a 72V system - 6 x12V batteries. You have a 72V controller, and upgrading to a bigger one costs more than you want to spend.

You could have one or extra batteries and contactors to disconnect the controller, and connect the other batteries in series with your main string. You now have a 82 or 86V OVERDRIVE for max speed!

In fact, many EV potentiometers have a microswitch on the minumum potentiometer end. You could just as easy put one on the high end to control the contactors.

Press down the gas pedal - start going - press further - go faster - press all the way down - CLICK! - FULL MAX VOLTAGE/MAX SPEED!
__________________


300mpg.org Learn how to BUILD YOUR OWN ELECTRIC CAR CHEAP
My YouTube Videos
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2009, 04:40 AM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 42

Tobaloula Rusttbukkitt - '95 Ax Elation
90 day: 44.11 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just wondering, since the consensus here seems to be that more batteries is better, what do people think of using AA batteries.

You can get a pack of 4 2.7amp 1.5v rechargables for about £5 here in the uk, sometimes cheaper. If you got a load of these, and set them up to output 72v and maybe 100amps would that be as effective as using barger batteries? And more importantly, would it be cheaper?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ben Nelson's Electro-Metro Build thread bennelson Fossil Fuel Free 1484 01-08-2012 11:12 PM
Electric car conversion: Project ForkenSwift MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 979 12-26-2011 10:37 AM
Got batteries! bennelson Success Stories 8 08-12-2008 07:32 PM
GM's Reportedly Road-Testing Lithium-Ion Batteries for the Volt SVOboy Fossil Fuel Free 5 05-25-2008 03:38 PM
Johnson Controls Batteries bennelson Fossil Fuel Free 1 03-14-2008 12:28 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com