Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2011, 06:56 PM   #1 (permalink)
W_S
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Most fuel-efficient accelerating technique- diesel vs. petrol

Hello

I have searched for this topic on the forum but did not find a clear answer. Most sources on ecodriving, and also many posters here, say that the most economical way to accelerate is to use high engine load (say, 75%) but to shift early. I have often come across suggestions to shift up at around 2000 rpm in diesels and around 2500 rpm in petrol-powered engines.

I understand that the basis for it is BSFC, which is usually the lowest around maximum torque (is it?). In modern diesels such an explanation sounds logical, as they usually have maximum torque around 1500-2000 rpm. However, most (non-turbicharged) petrol engines generate maximum torque around 4000 rpm. So shouldn't they have best BSFC around 4000 rpm? If so, shouldn't the driver use revs around 4000 while accelerating to get the best economy?

I suppose a reason for the suggestion to shift at 2500 rpm is that maximum torque is achieved at (let's say) 4000 rpm at full load only, while at 75% load the peak may be at lower rpms. Is this correct?

One more question: how about turbocharged petrol engines such as VW's TFSI? They have maximum torque at quite low revs. What is the most fuel-efficient behaviour in engines with such characteristics?

Many thanks in advance for clraifying this!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 08:02 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ashland, WI
Posts: 247

Nameless - '06 Canyon
90 day: 33.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 37 Times in 28 Posts
That's something that you have to find for yourself. You need a trip MPG readout, whether one built in to the vehicle, or a Scangauge or Ultragauge. Pick a route that you drive regularly - I used my route home from work. The trip MPG starts at zero, then check it at the same location every time. Try different techniques - accelerate hard, accelerate like a granny, etc. Keep in mind that you don't want to get in other people's way.

My truck does best when I step on it and shift at 2500 RPM.
__________________
34.9 MPG summer 2011. Winter 2011-2012 was warm, so only dropped to 30.1 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2011, 03:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
W_S
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi

I am not interested in my own car's response to various techniques but in a general rule that could be applied to all (internal combustion-powered) vehicles.

So any feedback of a more general nature would be much appreciated.

Many thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2011, 05:13 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 288

Sweetie - '011 Sonata GLS
90 day: 37.06 mpg (US)

HONKR - '94 KLX686
90 day: 59.94 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
75-80% load in my car means 1.6 gph, which is BARELY accelerating even in the low gears.

To have any useful acceleration I have to get to at least 2.0 gph on flat ground.
__________________
This ain't a war, anymore than a war between men and maggots. Or, dragons and wolves. Or, men riding dragons, throwing wolves at maggots!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2011, 05:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
99metro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Briggsdale, Colorado
Posts: 291

putt-putt - '99 Metro Base
Team Metro
90 day: 58.76 mpg (US)

Dusty - '89 Bronco XLT
90 day: 13.89 mpg (US)

Cowboy - '90 Bronco XLT
90 day: 17.42 mpg (US)

HayHauler - '06 3500 ST
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 12 Posts
Generally, IMO, is that gas/petrol engines should be accelerated at just below "open loop", which is right around 75% throttle. You want to keep the oxygen sensor in the fuel control loop - closed loop. This is for open country where there is distance between stops. Stop and go traffic should be easy throttle between stop lights. When the gasoline engine has to work hard, like accelerating, generally the least fuel used is a peak torque.

Diesels are another story. It will take some practice to see what works best. Generally, one ought to shift around 1200 rpm, then shift at around 1700 for the last gear. This is my opinion, not hard and true statement for everything.
__________________
2006 3500 Dodge QC/FB 5.9 handshaker
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 01:47 AM   #6 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,877

Svietlana - '05 307 SW
Diesel
90 day: 55.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 668
Thanked 361 Times in 229 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by W_S View Post
most (non-turbicharged) petrol engines generate maximum torque around 4000 rpm. So shouldn't they have best BSFC around 4000 rpm? If so, shouldn't the driver use revs around 4000 while accelerating to get the best economy?

I suppose a reason for the suggestion to shift at 2500 rpm is that maximum torque is achieved at (let's say) 4000 rpm at full load only, while at 75% load the peak may be at lower rpms. Is this correct?
My guess (correct me please!) is that at 4000rpm there is a lot more internal friction to overcome than at 2500, so as engine speed crawls up towards max torque efficiency increases but so does friction (at a faster rate). At some point one starts to overcome the other and that's when you should shift.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell

Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 09:13 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 74

Versa - '012 Versa Hatchback S
90 day: 38.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
what is the best marker for determining acceleration rate. I have tried utilizing both GPH and keeping it below 2.25 gph, and I have also used % engine load. I am not sure how accurate the load portion of my Ultra Gauge is. I have not found there is a specific difference. I am trying to figure this out for both regular accleration from stoping and for the portion of my commute I am able to do a mile P&G.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2011, 01:20 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ashland, WI
Posts: 247

Nameless - '06 Canyon
90 day: 33.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 37 Times in 28 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by W_S View Post
Hi

I am not interested in my own car's response to various techniques but in a general rule that could be applied to all (internal combustion-powered) vehicles.

So any feedback of a more general nature would be much appreciated.

Many thanks
Is no general rule. You need to find this for each vehicle because it's not as simple as staying the zone of best BSFC.

For example, part of the energy to accelerate is spent spinning up the rotating mass of the engine. That energy is greatest in the lowest gears, so the optimal shift points will be at lower RPM in the lowest gears.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
34.9 MPG summer 2011. Winter 2011-2012 was warm, so only dropped to 30.1 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com