Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-21-2011, 10:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Eastern, NC
Posts: 9
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My First Attempt at Hypermiling - Can you guess what kinda of car?

This was my first attempt at hypermiling - the average over this 2 minutes of data logging was 62.9 mpg at 55.0 mph. These results were achieved on relatively flat terrain, very light traffic, and the speed limit was 60 mph.

I used a Bluetooth wireless connection to the OBDII port on my car to log the data to my Android powered phone. No hands needed, it automatically logs from the time I start the car. The attached image is a graph of 2 minutes of sustained driving.

The big questing is, what kind of car was it ?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
Attached Images
File Type: jpg graph.jpg (95.4 KB, 76 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 04:49 AM   #2 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 580

Princess - '92 MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
90 day: 33.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 113 Times in 79 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
It's hard, the idle consumption and rev choice suggest a larger engine.

Maybe a bit more mass but with good aero.

I'm in a hurry, so i can't do math on the graph, i'll be back tho with a vengence!
__________________



Remember, even if you win the rat race - you're still a rat.

2010: 454.92L for 5313.90km => 8.56L/100km (27.5MPG US) (5 months)
2011: 606.11L for 7754.04km => 7.82L/100km (30.1MPG US) (Full year)
2012: 170.10L for 2405.00km => 7.07L/100km (33.3MPG US) (In progress)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 05:09 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Kodak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 346

Canyon - '07 Canyon 2wd regular cab
90 day: 24.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 37 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
It's hard, the idle consumption and rev choice suggest a larger engine.
Good observation. I got some high gph figures.

I see you did a good deal of P&G, so it's definitely stick. Pretty high idle consumption, revs never even reached 2300, it appears.

Eh, maybe something like a sports car? My guess is a Ford Mustang with a V8.

I could see that vehicle coasting pretty well, and it has plenty of power to keep engine speed low.
__________________
EcoDriving: Turning more fuel into usable forward motion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2011, 08:33 PM   #4 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,278

Clean Green Toaster Machine - '06 xB
90 day: 45.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 193 Times in 127 Posts
Rpms and leisurely acceleration combined with long glides indicate a small car to me. Not many of those are going to get 63 mpg averaging 55 mph. I also see high gph at idle. I'll guess Honda CR-Z, but it could be anything in the 1.5-2 liter class, having a good run on the terrain driven.

Bigger engines like a Mustang's usually turn low (<1800) rpms @ 60 mph.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.4 mpg avg over 30,375 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
Clean Green Toaster Machine
45.8 mpg over 2235 miles, 164% of '08 EPA

Last edited by SentraSE-R; 09-22-2011 at 08:52 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 06:43 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 62

2005 Dakota - '05 Dakota SLT
90 day: 15.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Prius?
Don't know how the recording would be for that thing, but I have to guess!
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 03:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 394

Silverado - '03 Silverado W/T
Pickups
90 day: 18.7 mpg (US)

Ninja 650R - '06 Ninja 650R
90 day: 52.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R View Post
Rpms and leisurely acceleration combined with long glides indicate a small car to me. Not many of those are going to get 63 mpg averaging 55 mph. I also see high gph at idle. I'll guess Honda CR-Z, but it could be anything in the 1.5-2 liter class, having a good run on the terrain driven.

Bigger engines like a Mustang's usually turn low (<1800) rpms @ 60 mph.
I'm leaning towards the same. I could get decent mpgs with my Corvette (which is probably the best mpgs for a V8 car due to light weight, excellent aero, and super high OD) but there was no way I could accelerate, even lightly, at 25mpg+. High revs at 60mph indicate a smaller engine.

I'd guess a TDI Golf with a manual tranny. I'd definately say manual since the rpm and engine speed is proportional, but I would have figured the coasting would be EOC. Whatever it is, it coasts a lot longer than anything I drive.
__________________
2003 Silverado:
Aero Mods


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 04:40 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
Whatever it is, it coasts a lot longer than anything I drive.
30s coasts aren't bad if that's on flat land.

I only get those going down a bridge or slowing down from higher speeds.
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 06:43 PM   #8 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 723

Beetle - '01 Beetle GLS
90 day: 42.61 mpg (US)

4x4 - '89 Pickup DLX
90 day: 30.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 60 Times in 42 Posts
With mileage that good, it's got to be a ALH TDI.

__________________

"We think B20 is for suckers" N. Cowell, Denver B100
"Climate change denial is a conclusion in search of a rationalization" labman57
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2011, 09:23 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JethroBodine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 431

Franken-Jetta - '90 Jetta GL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 51.61 mpg (US)

Starcruiser - '98 Pathfinder 4WD
SUV
90 day: 18.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 29 Times in 26 Posts
C'mon, we're all primed and ready to know... What are you selling? Is it the Bluetooth device?...Fuel additive that gives the same gas saving results from a V8 as a 4cylinder?... No activity on your account since this "question". Inquiring minds want to know.
__________________

Number 7 on the current POE list at last fill.

Quote:
It is always very amusing how our imagination is put to the test when overcoming reality. Redyaris
Boat tail project
Bonneville or Bust 2012
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 08:09 AM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Eastern, NC
Posts: 9
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Kodak Wins!

Kodak wins! Sorry there wasn't a prize but I am amazed that you got the car and engine right!

Nope wasn't selling anything.

The car is a basically stock 2005 Mustang GT (4.6L V8) that will run 13.8s at 99mph at the local drag strip. I strive to get great gas mileage so I can afford to go drag racing... a Dr Jekyll Mr Hyde kinda thing

I tried the experiment on a different day/road and managed over 55 mpg.

Some of the things that are helping the car achieve high mpg:
1-New synthetic lubes in trans and rear axle
2-Tires seem to have very little rolling resistance as evident when you romp down on it
3-Manual transmission - no torque converter
4-Windows up, AC off
5-For a few seconds on my initial run, I drafted a van. It left me rather quickly and I never caught back up to it. I do not know if this occurred during the time plotted.
6-That's all I have.

I trust the data to about +/- 3 mpg. Unfortunately, I will never have an entire tank where I didn't romp down on it at some point. I suppose I'm a hypermiling renegade but its all good!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com