Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-25-2009, 11:44 AM   #11 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,037

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.85 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 28.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 266 Times in 204 Posts
...what are you asking for? a "Smart Highway" from our government...sounds like a "motoring oxymoron" to me!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SIDI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 11:48 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoHypermiler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Harrisburg, IL
Posts: 8
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicycle Bob View Post
There is almost no danger driving 2' behind another vehicle, except for the cosmetics on the bumpers. Even if the lead vehicle slams on their brakes, the relative speed at impact is under 8 MPH. Pilots flying in really close formation know this.
A

You have made a VERY dangerous statement. There is a BIG difference in Nascar drivers and the public drafting. Nascar drivers are trained drivers and all the drivers use the same method.

Drafting a semi as close as 2' in a car is VERY dangerous. Vehicle mass and stopping distances are two factors very different from NASCAR.


Drafting is a dangerous practice that is not recommended. There are many other more safe ways to achieve great mileage.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to msirach For This Useful Post:
Chuck. (09-26-2009)
Old 09-25-2009, 02:10 PM   #13 (permalink)
Moderator
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '011 Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 61 Times in 39 Posts
I'd just like to point out that stopping distances for cars are shorter than semis. So that just leaves reaction time as a factor. The reason I don't do it is flying road gators.

Ratio of Speed to Stopping Distance
Oregon Trucking Associations: Stopping Distances For Cars vs. Trucks
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 02:28 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: williamsburg, virginia
Posts: 1,794

Red CBR - '011 CBR 250R
90 day: 74.21 mpg (US)

99 MAX - '99 Maxima GXE
90 day: 28.35 mpg (US)

Vulcan - '05 Vulcan 500 LTD
90 day: 56.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 82
Thanked 234 Times in 180 Posts
I think the best compromise is to draft when an opportunity arises.

Example:

On I64 yesterday the traffic was heavy. Many vehicles including big rigs were tailgating at 1 car length at 60 MPH.

I usually stay in the right lane and look for a 3 stripe cushion behind a large vehicle, preferably one with the undercarriage close to the ground.

It also sends a message to aggressive drivers that I am not interested in the left lane antics that are very dangerous. Most sane drivers will not try to pass on the right using my 150 foot cushion of distance, even when it is at least 5 times the average distance between vehicles.

Staying in the right lane with a 125 to 150 foot separation distance gives me the chance to stop completely in that cushion distance or swerve right to the shoulder if a large object is in the road.

It does require a greater level of concentration that driving on a deserted highway, but nothing compared to the level of concentration the aggressive tailgaters need to apply to their stupidity.

I would much prefer no drafting and a relaxed drive, but in some circumstances here it is just not a possibility, unless you want to feel like a doormat as people blast by you with 3 feet of clearance to pass, on the right, someone in the left lane. It's highly illegal but seldom enforced here.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 02:31 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,468
Thanks: 16
Thanked 175 Times in 127 Posts
On the other hand, driving on typical Northern California freeways (and I suppose elsewhere), you can't possibly avoid drafting. Maybe not at 2 feet, but if you leave much more than a car length following distance from the vehicle ahead, someone is sure to cut in. So you might as well find a semi to follow...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 08:04 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
blueflame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 333
Thanks: 7
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Some days everyone was drafting except me, the only hypermiler and ecomodder doing it slowly on my own.

So I decided to learn to draft properly and with more safety. Which was good as I was driving a slow diesel van with the aero's of a brick, and drafting really helps high CDa vehicles.

Side drafting is easy and safe. Sometimes in the middle of three lanes you get cars on both sides helping. Quite a technical skill as cornering on the extreme inside line(to reduce distances traveled), cross winds, leading vehicle shapes, beside road hillsides and windblocks, have to be constantly calculated.

Rear drafting at a good distance is perfectly safe and is better than no drafting at all.

Drafting at the right time begs consideration, especially in underpowered vehicles like Japanese diesel vans. If I was climbing a freeway hill and its going to be a strong headwind near the top, I would look for a lead vehicle prior to the accent which would allow the climb without needing to change down or reduce speed. Was a very courteous thing to do for other motorists who would have been inconvenienced by my slow van.

When boating I would always look for a wake to surf, or an island to get leeward of.

Doing a night drive Wellington to Auckland when gas was expensive, around 3am I saw 15 or so big rigs all drafting each other at around 65mph. Probably saved a stack of money. Really dangerous.

Dolphins draft up front, so the lead does benefit too
__________________

Last edited by blueflame; 09-25-2009 at 08:12 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 02:29 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,607
Thanks: 870
Thanked 636 Times in 372 Posts
Mythbusters

I think that the 1/24-scale windtunnel models were operating below critical Reynolds Number,so those numbers could be a little squirrely.--------- In full-scale,and without the "throttle feathering" they might have seen a full 50% improvement,which would agree with Kelly and Holcombe's research,constituting a 100% drag reduction.--------- And I'm with Bicycle Bob on the safety aspect at 2-foot clearance.Should the 18-wheeler jam the brake pedal,inertial effects would still allow for a soft kiss since they're starting at identical velocity.If they were touching it would be the safest.( test course driving,not the real world ).
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Bicycle Bob (09-26-2009), Luxbg (09-27-2009)
Old 09-26-2009, 02:31 PM   #18 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,037

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.85 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 28.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 266 Times in 204 Posts
...yeah, it's only those pesky "sudden" stops that get you!
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SIDI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 05:19 PM   #19 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,639

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 559
Thanked 690 Times in 491 Posts
Still, I was not interested in "kissing" that trailer on a bike!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 06:23 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,261

Appliance White - '93 Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Sprint Base
Thanks: 43
Thanked 139 Times in 105 Posts
Good plan. When bike racers are drafting closely, and wheels touch, the back rider goes down. There's no bumper, and they fall over if steered by a tow vehicle, or other contact.

With cars and trucks, as drafting distance decreases, the chance of collision keeps going up. However, when very close, the severity of the collision begins decreasing to zero, if the bumpers match.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EcoModder iPhone/iPod Touch Theme! SVOboy Forum News & Feedback 1 08-12-2008 11:58 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com