Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register
Now


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-01-2008, 10:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
zx3zetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 11

ZX3 Focus - '01 Focus ZX3
90 day: 31.47 mpg (US)
In neutral, no rpm drop?

I was driving my wife's new 2008 Ford Focus today.
It is an automatic transmission.
Anyway, I thought I'd try popping it in neutral while coasting down a hill to do a little "hypermiling". To my surprise, the RPMs stayed right where they were! (1500 rmp) I tried this a couple more times during my drive and experienced the same result. The RPMs stayed the same as just taking my foot off the gas and coasting in drive.
Idle in park is 900ish RPM, so I was quite surprised...

Anyone know what's going on???
By the way, the 2008 Focus is really really nice. We got 42 mpg on a trip last week by driving 60mph with the AC running.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2008, 02:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
fanamingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 37

fanamingo's Civic - '07 Civic LX
90 day: 41 mpg (US)
It's not just your car. My '99 Mercury Sable (Ford Taurus) with automatic transmission does the same thing. Even worse, when shifting from overdrive to neutral the rpms increase to what they would be if I were just in drive! I haven't hooked my ScanGauge up to see the actual effects on fuel consumption. I think it's just a characteristic of the transmission, but I don't know why it's built that way.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2008, 04:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 64

Jeep - '94 Grand Cherokee Limited
90 day: 13.29 mpg (US)

Windstar - '97 Windstar Cargo
90 day: 19.15 mpg (US)
i know from the Taurus it also if you're doing a neutral coast at high speeds like 45 or higher, the RPMs will actually go up quite a bit. I believe its to have the transmission spin at the same speed the engine is so it wont destroy the transmission when you reengage Drive.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2008, 05:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
CAUTION: May Stink!!!
 
BlackDeuceCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Arizona (USA) Missing Posts: 225
Posts: 202

BDC's Honda CiViC HX/Si - '98 HX/Si (HX Shell/Si Swap)
90 day: 41.36 mpg (US)
Send a message via ICQ to BlackDeuceCoupe Send a message via AIM to BlackDeuceCoupe Send a message via MSN to BlackDeuceCoupe Send a message via Yahoo to BlackDeuceCoupe
Quote:
Originally Posted by zx3zetec View Post
RPMs stayed right where they were! (1500 rmp)...

Idle in park is 900ish RPM, so I was quite surprised...

Anyone know what's going on???
Interesting!

My ride has a close-ratio, 5-speed tranny (S4C) with 4.4:1 final gearing.

I typically cruise @ 3000-4500 RPM (55-75 MPH).

Engine-on-coasting is 1100ish RPM, regardless of speed, 1-150 MPH...

As soon as the speedo hits '0' MPH, the idle falls to 900ish RPM too. Weird!

I *assume* this is due to some vagary in the ECU programming...

The ECU ultimately controls the idle speed in my car... probably yours too!
__________________
.:: B16A2 HX/Si Coupe | '98 HX shell with full '99 CiViC Si swap | 40+ MPG
Listen to the people who fail. They know what they're talking about!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 02:53 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
zx3zetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 11

ZX3 Focus - '01 Focus ZX3
90 day: 31.47 mpg (US)
Thank you all for your input!
I suppose it can all be attributed to all this drive-by-wire computer controlled stuff...
I guess it's a good thing, because once I missed neutral and threw it in reverse while going 50mph, and nothing happened :-)
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 04:59 PM   #6 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,689

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Wagon SW2
90 day: 42.91 mpg (US)
zx3zetec -

In my Saturn, at highway speeds, the "neutral idle" RPM is higher then my normal idle. My normal idle is between 800 and 900 RPMs. At highway speeds, the idle is usually between 1000 and 1200 RPMs. We have deduced that the ECU/PCM is changing the setting of my Idle Air Control valve because it is seeing higher MPH.

As long as your coasting-in-neutral RPM is lower than your coasting-in-gear RPM, then it's a win. But, not as good as it could be, .

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2008, 06:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ptsmith24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 174

El Camrino - '90 Camry LE
90 day: 34.5 mpg (US)
The RPMs while coasting in neutral and while sitting still in neutral are basically equal. I've only tried at speeds of ~50 MPH and lower, though. I try not to re-engage Drive before completely stopping though. I do that because I am unsure of the consequences. Interesting side note: The instant MPG on the MPGuino (still calibrating, but seems pretty accurate) is about the same whether I'm coasting in D or in N (different RPMs). Fuel cut-off, maybe? I'm still not sure how cut-off works, though.
__________________
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."
- General George S. Patton, Jr

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2008, 07:33 AM   #8 (permalink)
Eco Noob
 
Doofus McFancypants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tosev 3 - Atlanta GA
Posts: 207

Red Rover - '01 Altima GXE
90 day: 29.52 mpg (US)
In my wife's PT Cruiser - the RPM drop VERY VERY slowly.
like over a 3 minute period they drop.
I was trying to gather data on coasting in gear compared to coasting in N and i noted the RPM did not drop.
Since i have the SG hooked up, i could see the MPG increase in both cases.

After playing with it some more - I have chalked it up to ECU Programming to try to decrease delta in engine RPM and transmission RPM.
__________________
Steve - AKA Doofus McFancypants
------------------------------
PC Load Letter - what the heck does THAT mean?

First Milestone passed - 30 MPG (city) 5/15/08
Best Tank - 10/13/08 - 33.9 MPG City (+35%)
------
In effort to drive less:
Miles NOT driven = 457 (Work from home and Alt Transporatation)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2008, 01:05 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Speedway, Indiana USA
Posts: 56
I'm not knowledgeable about all makes, but some of this is intended to reduce the load on internal transmission parts when you go from neutral back to drive (if your vehicle speed is well above zero).

Also more engine speed to the converter means more trans pump speed means more lube flow - in some cases important to lubing various parts internal to the auto trans.

This is all made possible by the full authority powertrain electronic controls.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2008, 08:25 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoMod Wannabe
 
Sean T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 237

Taurusaurus Rex - '97 Taurus GL (Sedan)
90 day: 22.25 mpg (US)
you guys beat me to it. I was gonna say, in my taurus, sometimes it goes up when I shift into neutral.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2008, 08:54 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Danvers, MA
Posts: 222

Bone's Toyota - '05 4Runner
90 day: 21.98 mpg (US)

Bone's Scooter - '08 50 cc Scooter
90 day: 76.83 mpg (US)
I have an 05 Toyota 4runner and the rpm's drop in neutral coast compared to in drive but run higher than in drive when I'm not moving. Neutral coast is about 500 rpm's lower than in drive at 50 mph but about 200 rmp's higher than in drive when not moving.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2008, 11:33 PM   #12 (permalink)
Oil Tycoon
 
mopo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 35

Siray - '09 Yaris sedan
90 day: 42.17 mpg (US)
I experienced this effect when I first started hypermiling and had not known anything about the proper techniques. I thought it might have been some accessory the engine was trying to power, put unless it was the water pump I had everything else off. I wonder if there is a way to modify the the ECU to lower that idle by 100 rpm.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2008, 09:43 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sweetwater, TN
Posts: 27

The Green Hornet - '96 Escort Wagon LX
90 day: 45.52 mpg (US)
It is a factory safety item programmed into the EEC. Keeps engine speed high enough to power all accesories, power brakes and power steering. It is typically 500-600 rpm over normal idle speed. It could be tuned out, but you run the risk of engine stall if you put a high load at low rpm. For example, if doing 50 mph , in neutral, you decide to turn hard, turn a/c on and brake at the same time.

Last edited by 93Cobra#2771; 09-10-2008 at 11:16 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2008, 03:48 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Speedway, Indiana USA
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by mopo3 View Post
I wonder if there is a way to modify the the ECU to lower that idle by 100 rpm.
Quite possibly if you have a brand that someone has developed aftermarket ECU tuning.
GM, Ford, and Honda for sure.

I've not found anything for the S series Saturn though.
If anybody does, I love to know.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 10:28 AM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Troy, NY
Posts: 6
As for idle being higher in neutral compared to in drive when no moving. This just makes sense. Granted I don't have the Fords mentioned, but the automatic is not 100% efficient and much less so when not moving and allowing that 'slip' to happen. It's not the idle that's changing, the idle is changed to handle the load when in gear. For instance in neutral you're at 1100, you switch to D and you're at 800 and you can clearly tell there's a load on the engine by the sound. It's probably the same IAC/throttle position in both cases. In P it can drop to the lowest RPM the engine will idle at because it doesn't have to worry about 0MPH in D and stalling.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 10:33 AM   #16 (permalink)
dcb
Master EcoModder
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 3rd rock
Posts: 1,310

pimp mobile - '81 gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nascarnation View Post
I've not found anything for the S series Saturn though.
If anybody does, I love to know.

Well it isn't perfect, but some s-series folks just warm up the car and turn everything on (ac/rear defroster,headlights), then unplug the idle control motor. It's manageable for the most part.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 10:55 AM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Plymouth Meeting PA
Posts: 8

XR7 - '97 Cougar XR7
90 day: 21.85 mpg (US)

93Lx - '93 Thunderbird Lx
From what I have read the computer keeps the high rpm when shifting into neutral for emissions reasons.
The sudden change in load causes the temperature in the combustion chamber to rise and creates more NOx. This slow drop is programmed to smooth the transition and reduce this particular pollutant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 12:33 AM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Formula413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 200

S. Court El Ecks - '97 Escort LX
90 day: 31.17 mpg (US)

Sleepwalker - '97 Firebird Formula
90 day: 19.15 mpg (US)

Spock - '92 Vulcan
90 day: 57.88 mpg (US)
I've noticed this in the van I drive at work (2008 E150 4.6L V8). If I was driving at, say, 45 mph at 1600 rpm and shift into neutral the rpms will stay right at 1600, then slowly fall as the vehicle decelerates. It's like automated rev matching. In my Escort the revs will drop to just slightly higher than idle when shifting into neutral while moving.
__________________


Choices, choices...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 10:08 AM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sweetwater, TN
Posts: 27

The Green Hornet - '96 Escort Wagon LX
90 day: 45.52 mpg (US)
It isn't really rev matching, just a coincidence. The EEC in your van is 11 years newer than the Escort EEC - they have learned much about engine control since then.

Nice escort, though I like my green better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 10:12 AM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Posts: 138

Big Blue - '06 Dakota Quad SLT
Last 3: 20.2 mpg (US)

Miazda - '96 Miata mx-5
90 day: 36.48 mpg (US)
'06 Dadge Dakota 4spd auto. returns to normal neutral rpm if coasting at less than 35mph. Over 35, it idles about 300 rpm higher.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coasting in Neutral Vs. Coasting in Drive observation fonque Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 21 07-17-2008 04:49 PM
Car Won't Start While Moving in Neutral Any Ideas? Axaday EcoModding Central 3 06-30-2008 12:26 AM
Can low rpm damage the engine? KiaRio2004 Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 4 06-10-2008 10:33 AM
Experiment: EV coastdown in gear vs. neutral (in the ForkenSwift) MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 6 03-17-2008 11:12 AM
Honda IACV explained TomO Off-Topic Tech 0 02-09-2008 01:32 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
All content copyright EcoModder.com