Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2009, 01:14 AM   #1 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
New Clean Coal Commercial

"Wind is a great resource for the future."

"Coal can provide that [night time demand] energy, no matter what Mother Nature is doing."

"The new Clean Coal plants that are being built today are... lightyears ahead of those built 30 years ago..."

Just saw this commercial tonight. Apparently, they can make coal a clean burning fuel, but they can't differentiate between measures of time and distance.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 10:55 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Posts: 201
Thanks: 50
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Hmm. Well, "ahead" could be descriptive of time or distance, so I think their hyperbolic advertising metaphor can be construed to make sense (as far as such things ever do.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 12:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkp1187 View Post
Hmm. Well, "ahead" could be descriptive of time or distance, so I think their hyperbolic advertising metaphor can be construed to make sense (as far as such things ever do.)
"...30 years ago..." suggests that they're referring to time, not distance.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 04:20 PM   #4 (permalink)
Driving the TurboWeasel
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Steuben County, NY
Posts: 458
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
They're telling the truth just enough to support their lie. They are correct in saying the current coal plants are cleaner than ones built 30 years ago. They lie in stating implicitly that windmills do not turn at night. Also that there is no mechanism to store the electricity generated during the day. There isn't right now, and people are looking.

Another lie is that the plants will only be used at night.

I'd rather see nuclear than coal. Nukes emit zero emissions when generating the electricity. We have to deal with the waste, which is a doozy.
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco 6MT
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 04:36 PM   #5 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99LeCouch View Post
They're telling the truth just enough to support their lie. They are correct in saying the current coal plants are cleaner than ones built 30 years ago. They lie in stating implicitly that windmills do not turn at night. Also that there is no mechanism to store the electricity generated during the day. There isn't right now, and people are looking.

Another lie is that the plants will only be used at night.

I'd rather see nuclear than coal. Nukes emit zero emissions when generating the electricity. We have to deal with the waste, which is a doozy.
Nuclear waste turns into lead as it breaks down, right? So why not invest it in lead-acid batteries for the EV's that are getting charged by the nuclear power?

(Asinine, I know...)


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Tags
clean coal, commercial, light years, measurement, wind

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Dodge Ram Commercial Matt Herring Off-Topic Tech 87 12-15-2009 03:29 PM
Mythbusters "tests" efficiency of dimples vs. smooth, and clean vs. muddy car MetroMPG Aerodynamics 111 11-20-2009 11:35 PM
Plug-in cars are not necessarily greener than conventional cars RobertSmalls The Lounge 33 01-24-2009 07:15 AM
Video: Modec EV - commercial truck MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 1 11-26-2008 10:59 PM
Video: Geo Metro Commercial! Peakster General Efficiency Discussion 5 12-13-2007 10:54 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com