Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-30-2010, 06:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
alternating valve engine
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: oklahoma city, oklahoma USA
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
New turbo transfers power direct to the crank

I have finished the design work on a turbo that I invented several years ago. The patent is now pending. The turbo has four pick up blades, one located very near each exhaust port of a four cylinder inline engine. A common shaft joins the four pick up blades and at one end is a compressor blade which blows air into the engine just like a normal turbo. At the other end of the shaft is a very small gear reduction box which drives a small slipage converter which drives a ring gear that is connected to the rear of the crankshaft. Once the desired amount air boost is aquired from the front of the turbo, instead of a waste gate the unit transfers the remaining energy to the rear of the unit where the gear box picks up the energy. If you want additional info call anytime 405 751 4521. Please be polite. I am not interested in arguements. Combine this with my Alternating valve engine and mileage will go the the moon.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 06:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,093

The Clunker (retired) - '90 Accord EX sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 29.49 mpg (US)

Uranus - '04 Ion 2 sedan
90 day: 38.21 mpg (US)

Mountain Goat - '96 Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab
90 day: 18 mpg (US)

Zippy - '010 Agility 125
Thanks: 5
Thanked 51 Times in 40 Posts
You can't have egg, bacon, spam and sausage without the spam.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 06:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
Slow and easy
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 509

Josie - '87 Pickup
90 day: 30 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
This is very old news.
Turbo-compound engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________

You're not in front of me...
I'm 25,000 miles in front of you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 10:57 PM   #4 (permalink)
Hydrogen Nut
 
Ptero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 125

Smart Car ForTwo Pure - '08 Fortwo Pure stripped
90 day: 51.35 mpg (US)

BMW 750iL V12 - '90 V12

Wildfire 250C - '08 250C
Thanks: 2
Thanked 17 Times in 12 Posts
I think you will find the efficiency gain requires the engine to be operated at a very high rpm because the turbine requires a high volume of exhaust gas to provide any benefit. Note the two-stroke diesel engines and the necessarily high rpm aircraft engines mentioned in the Wikipedia article. Unfortunately, this is the realm of horsepower and is far above the realm of torque, where mpg gains are made.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 01:22 AM   #5 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
I hate to break it to you but turbo-compounding was invented many, many years ago.

Well, OK, I don't hate breaking it to you.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Joe_Bloe (10-06-2010)
Old 10-01-2010, 04:28 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 645

Chug - '96 Polo CL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
As above, bitof an old idea which has been sidelined for sometime IIRC it was because the net gain wasn't great enough compared to a regular turbo on smaller engines, there is a lot of work (@crank and compression) from not-a-lot of work out (exhaust)
__________________
-----------------------------------------
good things come to those who wait, sh*t turns up pretty much instantly






twitter.com/bertchalmers
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 07:42 AM   #7 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
I wonder what the motivation is? Do people send him money or what?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 12:29 PM   #8 (permalink)
Gen II Prianista
 
Rokeby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ballamer, Merlin
Posts: 391
Thanks: 155
Thanked 98 Times in 59 Posts
"Once the desired amount air boost is aquired from the front of the turbo, instead of a waste gate the unit transfers the remaining energy to the rear of the unit where the gear box picks up the energy."

Should read:

Once the desired amount of cash is aquired [sic] from the rubes, instead of a workable product the unit transfers the remaining money to the rear of the shop where my brother-in-law, Buba, picks up the cash.


Last edited by Rokeby; 10-01-2010 at 01:02 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 02:39 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

The Beast - '98 Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 14.58 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Ptero - In theory, couldn't you spin a smaller engine faster to get the same HP out of a similar amount of fuel?
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 03:37 PM   #10 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
...the R3350 engines on our Lockheed EC-121 "Warning Star" airborne radar station were "turbo-compound" where three power-recovery turbines (PRT) "collected" exhaust energy and coupled it directly back to the main crankshaft.

...good for an additional 150 hp from 3,000 hp engine...and really helped reduce their fuel consumption numbers at cruise.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 

Last edited by Old Tele man; 10-02-2010 at 04:06 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Paul & Sabrina's cheap DIY 144v motor controller MPaulHolmes Open ReVolt: open source DC motor controller 5824 Today 04:25 PM
Power Steering delete for fuel economy gain - anyone done it? bennelson EcoModding Central 66 03-28-2012 08:06 AM
Why We Have No Wind or Solar Power SuperTrooper General Efficiency Discussion 220 07-20-2011 10:37 PM
Diesel Power Magazine Disappointment. ConnClark EcoModding Central 16 06-05-2009 10:39 PM
Turbo to drive accessories? reformed EcoModding Central 14 06-22-2008 04:28 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com