04-28-2008, 08:23 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Ohh snap
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 815
Thanks: 39
Thanked 85 Times in 44 Posts
|
My first car was a '98 Lincoln with a 4.6 V8, and I regularly got over 30 mpg with it.
Was also easily the fastest car I've ever driven. I wonder sometimes about what happened too, whats progress again?
As we move back to small, light cars, I can't help but love the quote "The more things change the more they stay the same."
__________________
|
|
|
|
04-28-2008, 08:49 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Frozen Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,069
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 31 Posts
|
Hey! At least an American car with a manual transmission for a change. supposedly they reworked the final drive gearing, too.
Now all the need to do is to get basjoos and aerohead to work on their aerodynamics.
Too bad Tier II choked the future of diesels.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Hard Tonneau and Rugged Air Dam
|
|
|
|
04-29-2008, 01:01 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wauseon, OH (Toledo)
Posts: 383
The TC - '88 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe 90 day: 28.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by basjoos
When you consider that a 68 VW Beetle got 34mpg on the highway 40 years ago, it makes you wonder at how much progress has actually been made over the past 40 years. Replacing the high maintenance points with an electronic ignition, eliminating grease fittings, and cleaning up the exhaust appears to be about it. They certainly haven't made much improvement in the fuel economy.
|
They have added a LOT more luxury and comfort to todays cars, as well as weight.
__________________
BP+T/G5MR swapped '93 Festiva
Escort GT Block, Garrett T3 50trim, A/R .42/.48
SRT-4 Intercooler
---Bests with BP+T---
1/4 mile ET - 12.99
1/4 mile MPH - 109.8
Best MPG - 36.8
Average MPG - 31 (over 11,500 miles)
|
|
|
|
04-29-2008, 01:37 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 1,651
Thanks: 539
Thanked 93 Times in 54 Posts
|
And horsepower.
__________________
"You don't fail until you give up. You learn, and move on." - Christ
" Hypermiling is not going slow, it's driving with more intelligence." - UFO
|
|
|
|
04-29-2008, 02:05 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Future EV Owner
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sussex Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
And safety features and pollution control.
__________________
Last edited by Arminius; 04-29-2008 at 02:19 AM..
|
|
|
|
05-01-2008, 09:59 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wichita
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
[QUOTE=basjoos;21973]When you consider that a 68 VW Beetle got 34mpg on the highway 40 years ago, it makes you wonder at how much progress has actually been made over the past 40 years. QUOTE]
Your 68 beetle had 45 hp. The cobalt would have at least twice that amount.
|
|
|
|
05-01-2008, 11:17 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
UnderModded
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 319
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox
Glad to see this. They also dropped a 6 speed auto tranny in their Malibu LTZ. It now gets the same mileage as their mild hybrid.
|
I think it can also safely EOC as well.
__________________
|
|
|
|
05-01-2008, 11:26 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Nashua, New Hampshire
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by basjoos
When you consider that a 68 VW Beetle got 34mpg on the highway 40 years ago, it makes you wonder at how much progress has actually been made over the past 40 years. Replacing the high maintenance points with an electronic ignition, eliminating grease fittings, and cleaning up the exhaust appears to be about it. They certainly haven't made much improvement in the fuel economy.
|
They've learned a ton about fuel economy, however, emissions standards went up and the mods required to clean up the engines sapped all the power and economy. Impact standards went up and cars got heavier. Marketing helped to convince everyone that 150 HP and 4 cyl. was "under powered" so manufacturers were afraid to market smaller more efficient engines. Gasoline shifted to unleaded which meant lower octane, and therefore reduced compression ratio or timing advance. All that technology they've created to improve mileage is there and functioning, which is why that Cobalt gets around the same mileage, but lasts longer, is safer, has more power, is more comfortable, requires less maintenance and puts out a fraction of the emissions the 68 Beetle did. Roll back some of the impact standards and emissions standards, and they could easily make that Beetle look pretty inefficient. (By the way, I never got much more than 25-30 mpg on any of my stock air cooled Beetles, and I've owned about 4, including a 69 identical to the 68 in question..) Cheers!
__________________
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 12:32 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: kansas city, mo
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by basjoos
When you consider that a 68 VW Beetle got 34mpg on the highway 40 years ago, it makes you wonder at how much progress has actually been made over the past 40 years. Replacing the high maintenance points with an electronic ignition, eliminating grease fittings, and cleaning up the exhaust appears to be about it. They certainly haven't made much improvement in the fuel economy.
|
I drove a 74 super beetle 2 weeks ago. It sucked. It was very well cared for and maintained. But it still sucked. It was slow, loud, handled horrible, hot, stopped lousy, hard to start, smelled like gas, and I found myself sitting in a crumple zone. All of it. Any bad new car is better than an old beetle. There fun for nostalgia though.
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 03:10 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Future EV Owner
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sussex Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovemysan
I drove a 74 super beetle 2 weeks ago. It sucked. It was very well cared for and maintained. But it still sucked. It was slow, loud, handled horrible, hot, stopped lousy, hard to start, smelled like gas, and I found myself sitting in a crumple zone. All of it. Any bad new car is better than an old beetle. There fun for nostalgia though.
|
Plus it would break 2 dozen modern safety and emission laws if it were produced today.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|