Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Off-Topic Tech
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2010, 09:11 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

The Beast - '98 Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 14.58 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
As was said above, unless the engine can take advantage of the extra octane in its ECU tuning, you're just wasting money by going above what the manual says.

My Jeep gets premium (93 both here and at home), as it has a fairly aggressive timing curve, and no knock sensors. The manual requires (not recommends) 91 minimum, and it would definitely ping on any less.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 01:46 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Got any evidence to back that up? I've heard many claim this but have never seen any testing done to back it up.

I'd agree with Patrick that its a waste and is useless unless the engine is programmed to take advantage of it.
Physical proof no but I did help with allot of the Servicing on the van. At 250,000Km the motor started acting up and the economy went through the floor we switched to high octane and the motor stopped acting up and the economy went up a bit. It was not the greatest but hey its an Astro.

As for the post if your motor is tuned for it then go for it. If not don't bother.
__________________
2 cars one never gets driven the other is an MPG project already at 5% increase in standard driving economy CAI and Pulstar plus. Thinking weight reduction next year.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 02:57 AM   #13 (permalink)
Drive lots knows little
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 59

blue slug - '06 Insight
90 day: 85.96 mpg (US)

BEAST - '88 F250 Lariet
90 day: 24.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I have been using octane booster in my gas now for about 3 weeks, the bottle says one ounce boosts normal gas to 108 octane. I have been putting about 3 ounces per 8 gallon fill which boosts to roughly 92-94. It doesnt seem to do much for my normal burning but when I get into lean burn it seems to help boost power. I am able to drive at faster speeds and at the same time keep the higher mileage I was getting running slower. I figure it is costing me about 8 cents per gallon which is cheaper than running the premium gas.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 02:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danncomm View Post
I figure it is costing me about 8 cents per gallon which is cheaper than running the premium gas.
...then, it certainly seems to be "worth it" to you.

...some people gain, some lose and others see nothing.

...wonder if this works for all Prius engines, or only the '06 year model?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 03:45 PM   #15 (permalink)
Drive lots knows little
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 59

blue slug - '06 Insight
90 day: 85.96 mpg (US)

BEAST - '88 F250 Lariet
90 day: 24.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I would think it would work well in any engine that has a lean burn mode, I don't know who made lean burn mode engines except honda. This would be a cheaper way also for cars that do need higher octane fuels, because they would be able to use the cheaper and more energy dense lower octane fuels and then add the booster. Might not help much maybe a mile or 3 because of the increased energy density of the lower octane fuels and the ability to have the engine advance the ignition slightly and gain from the enhanced burn. Maybe I am full of hot air and misinformation, but this is how it was explained to me. It seems to help with retaining power while in lean burn.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ScanGauge and Octane mcrews Instrumentation 9 09-14-2010 01:45 AM
weird results: octane matters? Dean in Milwaukee EcoModding Central 5 07-11-2010 02:11 AM
Higher Octane...bad? MadisonMPG General Efficiency Discussion 10 03-25-2010 05:30 PM
Effect of fuel octane number on FE hummingbird EcoModding Central 32 10-28-2009 12:50 AM
87 octane and retarded timing Quattro General Efficiency Discussion 4 02-20-2009 08:29 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com