Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2010, 08:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 326

Tank - '76 El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Octane booster Help or hurt Fuel Economy?

Has anyone done any actual A-B-A testing on this? I know since i advanced my timing and stepped Tank up to 91 octane about a year ago i pull an extra 1.5-2 MPG but I'm thinking if this works then some octane boosters may make a difference as well Either good or bad. Anyone on here tried octane booster to boos fuel economy? If not would anyone mind doin it to see if it changes anything?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 08:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
Ethanol Fan
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 262

Mr. Fox - '91 Mustang GT
90 day: 15.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Nay, the octane boosters add 1/10th of an Octane aka a point. And the size is negligible to a fuel tank with several gallons. Some of the Street/Racers use Xylene to boost octane. But it is much more expensive than gasoline. Older engines have carbon buildup so switching to a higher octane will help with aging problems but the only way to fix it is to get the engine cleaned, the most common method is to use something like seafoam.

Advancing the timing and moving up on octane has been done before. The benefits are a wash, it can give better MPG but rarely does it compensate for the higher cost. If it does increase MPG Your Mileage will Vary and it differs based on the engine.
__________________
~Allch Chcar
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 08:44 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 326

Tank - '76 El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Well i seafoamed it and that definately cleaned out a bunch of junk in the car but I know for sure my car runs smoother and more economical on the 91 octane But are you saying you've used octane booster to try and gain mileage?
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 09:28 PM   #4 (permalink)
Ethanol Fan
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 262

Mr. Fox - '91 Mustang GT
90 day: 15.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
No.

It's a matter of volume. 16 ounces of octane booster isn't going to make an appreciable difference to a 15 gallon tank of 87 Octane. You need more than a gallon of 100 octane to make any difference in that much fuel.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
~Allch Chcar
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel Economy related papers tasdrouille General Efficiency Discussion 33 03-06-2012 12:22 PM
List of common mechanical problems that hurt fuel economy Andyman General Efficiency Discussion 8 12-20-2011 06:29 AM
Canada's top fuel efficient cars (by class) for 2010 MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 3 05-09-2011 01:56 AM
mileage computer for a carbureted engine diesel_john Instrumentation 162 07-18-2010 05:31 PM
smart cdi (diesel) owner from BC, Canada smartzuuk Introductions 23 04-10-2010 12:22 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com