Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-14-2010, 07:09 PM   #11 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,724

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 459 Times in 315 Posts
Old Tele man -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...just wait for the new Cruze to replace the Cobalt...a transition from American-designed to Korean-designed.
Interesting. I didn't know the Cruze was Korean :

Chevrolet Cruze - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
Second generation (J300; 2008–present)
GM in 2008 introduced the second generation Cruze, designated J300. This second iteration serves as a replacement for the Chevrolet Cobalt and Daewoo Lacetti—both unrelated cars. The first renderings of the Cruze were revealed by GM at a press conference on July 15, 2008, with the first official images released on August 21, 2008.
To manufacture the Cruze, GM have extensively upgraded existing plant facilities. At the U.S. facility in Lordstown, Ohio, GM is investing more than US$350 million. Other production sites comprise of Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, South Korea; Saint Petersburg, Russia; Shenyang, China; and Halol, India. Holden's localized hatchback version of the Cruze to be built at the Elizabeth, South Australia factory from 2010 (see below) will be accompanied by Australian manufacture of the Cruze sedan. From this point, Cruze imports from South Korea to Australia will be suspended.

History of development
Underpinned by the front-wheel drive GM Delta II platform, GM claims the Cruze was developed by a global design and engineering team. This development program spanned over 27 months at a cost of US$4 billion. During this time, 221 GM-built prototypes were tested in Australia (by Holden), Canada, China, South Korea (by GM Daewoo), Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States.
It's not clear that it's 100% Korean, but there is definitely shared expertise.

CarloSW2


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2010, 07:19 PM   #12 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,353

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 331 Times in 250 Posts
...I almost wrote Korean made, but from what I've read, all the US cars will be actually made-in-USA at the GM Tennessee plant.

...since the Korean-designed body (chassis is GM) has been "on the road" for a couple years already, I'd classify the Cruze as a Korean-design with GM-tweeks.
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970˝ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 02:24 AM   #13 (permalink)
Hybrid Student Driver
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,715

Teggy - '98 Integra LS
90 day: 33.02 mpg (US)

IMA - '010 Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 45.43 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 TSX Base
90 day: 28.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
Alternative yes, but the MT Cobalts can get upwards of 50mpg driven gingerly, current Focus from what I remember cannot be driven to 50mpg easily. Also once things get out there and used a while whats left gets more reliable as all the needed repairs are done over time.
This is true with initial quality, but sustained reliability is yet another measurement.

Also agreed, the Cobalt MT can achieve some serious FE numbers for skilled EcoDrivers -- I just prefer Ford, who can come close for more-average driver -- and offer better ergonomics, etc (IMO).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...I almost wrote Korean made, but from what I've read, all the US cars will be actually made-in-USA at the GM Tennessee plant.

...since the Korean-designed body (chassis is GM) has been "on the road" for a couple years already, I'd classify the Cruze as a Korean-design with GM-tweeks.
IIRC, the current Lordstown, Ohio plant for the Cobalt is also slated to produce the Cruze for US and other markets. Despite being designed elsewhere, Union shops will build the vehicle here. Chevy's small car market has generally been re-badged Daewoos and Suzukis around the world, including here with the Aveo, so that should help the workforce here with Domestic production. It all goes back to the notion of the "American" car, which can be debated for hours.

Toyota and GM had a great arrangement with the Pontiac Vibe / Toyota Matrix made in California (which has since dissolved) -- somewhat similar.

RH77
__________________
Supporting those devastated by the Joplin Tornado
EF5 / 22-May-2011


_
_
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 10:04 AM   #14 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,353

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 331 Times in 250 Posts
...I know about the Toyota/GM "marriage/divorce" as we own two (2) Pontiac Vibes ('04 and '09)...or should I say two Toyotas with Pontiac "badges"?

...and, thanks for the correction about Ohio vs. Tennessee.
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970˝ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2010, 11:19 AM   #15 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,724

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 459 Times in 315 Posts
Old Tele man -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...I know about the Toyota/GM "marriage/divorce" as we own two (2) Pontiac Vibes ('04 and '09)...or should I say two Toyotas with Pontiac "badges"?

...and, thanks for the correction about Ohio vs. Tennessee.
Yeah, last I heard the Toyota Corolla/Tacoma/Pontiac Vibe factory in Fremont California is set to close. NUMMI is the only Union factory that Toyota owns, and that was a joint ownership with GM. With GM out of the deal, the factory is a goner.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2010, 02:39 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Ecobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Personal review: Domman56's writing

You don't start a sentence with "so" (or with any conjunction).
Two nouns and two adjectives do not make a complete sentence.
There is only one complete sentence in the second paragraph.
Go back and look for typos.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2010, 10:44 AM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17

Boris - '04 9-3 Linear
90 day: 22.75 mpg (US)

Natasha - '010 9-3 Combi 2.0 T
90 day: 24.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm actually considering one of these in the next couple of months. I suspect that when the Cruze and Fiesta arrive, the lowly Cobalt - especially in the bare bones trim levels - will be very reasonable.

As far as the review, meh. I've been researching this for a little while, and some of the road tests in '08 and '09 for the XFE trims were "Well, this thing is EPA'd at 25/37, so we took it to the track, did a lot of quarter mile runs, and left it sit idling with the A/C on and only got 22." Well duh.

I'm not interested in how bad it can be, but I am interested in what a person can do with it, leaving the engine on, obeying traffic laws (stop signs), but being very careful with the loud pedal and accessories. For that, I'm getting the feeling that the humble Cobalt is quite possibly a sleeper. If I'm correct, it seems like it might be a little better than the Focus. That's not bad.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2010, 11:47 AM   #18 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,724

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 459 Times in 315 Posts
Baggage Handler #2 -

I researched the Cobalt's foibles (all cars have them) and wouldn't be afraid of getting one, especially an XFE :

Ion-Centric repair list? - SaturnFans Forums

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cfg83 For This Useful Post:
Baggage Handler #2 (06-19-2010)
Old 06-19-2010, 01:35 PM   #19 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,353

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 331 Times in 250 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baggage Handler #2 View Post
I'm not interested in how bad it can be, but I am interested in what a person can do with it, leaving the engine on, obeying traffic laws (stop signs), but being very careful with the loud pedal and accessories.
...what? you want a realistic test & review from the LA-hotrod boys? (I once wrote for HOTROD Magazine)
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970˝ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2010, 02:56 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17

Boris - '04 9-3 Linear
90 day: 22.75 mpg (US)

Natasha - '010 9-3 Combi 2.0 T
90 day: 24.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...what? you want a realistic test & review from the LA-hotrod boys? (I once wrote for HOTROD Magazine)
Ha! Good one. I think this was Motor Trend, which always seemed a little more beige than the others. But yeah, you're right.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gen III 2010 Prius Matt Herring Hybrids 3 08-30-2010 03:04 AM
2004-2008 Chevy Malibu (Review) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 7 04-27-2010 03:12 PM
2010 Mazda3 sedan has a Cd of .29 1337 Aerodynamics 5 04-13-2009 08:33 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com