Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-16-2012, 07:51 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 668 Times in 410 Posts
I read the material as well and will suggest this:

Since the GM patent only used a Chevy short bed and the Texas Tech tested both short and long bed F150's, perhaps the long bed skewed Texas Tech's numbers. Maybe the full tonneau is more suited to a long bed pickup since its length does not obey the 15 degree rule. If the half tonneau was less efficient on the long bed it could pull down the average they used on the graph.

Food for thought?

__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-16-2012, 08:28 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 279
Thanks: 90
Thanked 240 Times in 90 Posts
Recent Ford patent application.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
OK, thanks.
Found an interesting patent application filed by Ford on May 11, 2009, while searching for prior art on the pickup truck tailgate mount boatail. It seems one of the inventors is a gentleman named Kelly Kohlstrand, a member of the Ford Advanced Product Marketing and Technology Planning Team.

If you want to read the application it is - US 2010/0283280 A1

Title - Vehicle Cargo Management System

You can access it at - United States Patent and Trademark Office

From the text and drawings it can be determined that the cargo bed is covered by a panel for about the last two feet of the bed, just forward of the closed tailgate.

In the Abstract of the patent it reads:

"The systems partially cover the cargo bed and/or tailgate thereby reducing turbulence at the end of the vehicle and improving vehicle fuel efficiency."

I've heard of Ford!

Bondo
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bondo For This Useful Post:
aerohead (03-17-2012), BamZipPow (03-18-2012)
Old 03-17-2012, 12:49 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,879
Thanks: 23,955
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
2-feet

Quote:
Originally Posted by bondo View Post
Found an interesting patent application filed by Ford on May 11, 2009, while searching for prior art on the pickup truck tailgate mount boatail. It seems one of the inventors is a gentleman named Kelly Kohlstrand, a member of the Ford Advanced Product Marketing and Technology Planning Team.

If you want to read the application it is - US 2010/0283280 A1

Title - Vehicle Cargo Management System

You can access it at - United States Patent and Trademark Office

From the text and drawings it can be determined that the cargo bed is covered by a panel for about the last two feet of the bed, just forward of the closed tailgate.

In the Abstract of the patent it reads:

"The systems partially cover the cargo bed and/or tailgate thereby reducing turbulence at the end of the vehicle and improving vehicle fuel efficiency."

I've heard of Ford!

Bondo
An article appeared in Pop. Sci.in 1981 after the National Plywood Assoc. annual meeting.In the article 'Plywood ups mileage',they mention that Ford recognized fuel savings on their pickup after covering only the first one foot of bed in front of the closed gate.
There is an image of the article in my photo-archive.
I would have to guess that they were expanding on the 1981 discovery.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2012, 12:58 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,879
Thanks: 23,955
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
Maybe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
I read the material as well and will suggest this:

Since the GM patent only used a Chevy short bed and the Texas Tech tested both short and long bed F150's, perhaps the long bed skewed Texas Tech's numbers. Maybe the full tonneau is more suited to a long bed pickup since its length does not obey the 15 degree rule. If the half tonneau was less efficient on the long bed it could pull down the average they used on the graph.

Food for thought?
It is food for thought.Is it possible to model open cavities with flow-illustrator,as in the open bed of a pickup,then partial openings? The full tonneau might be straight forward.
The centerline vortex could talk to us.
Texas tech never showed a FLUENT representation of the full cover flow.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com