Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

View Poll Results: Do you think a 928 is more aero going forward or backward? Episode airs Nov 17th!
Forward 15 40.54%
Backward 22 59.46%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-19-2010, 11:30 AM   #31 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
QuickLTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 188

Flying Brick - '96 Bonneville SE
90 day: 23.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 6 Posts
Send a message via AIM to QuickLTD Send a message via Yahoo to QuickLTD
Yeah the weight distribution bugged me. I understand that the rear wheel arches are lower than the front but if you look at rocker panels you could clearly see how the body was raked lower in the front and higher in the rear. I'm sure the rear body is heavier than the front with all that glass compounding the problem. They should have placed the weight on the passengers seat if they were going to just randomly place it. Also whats for a show that claims to exact high quality results from its repeated testing whats with the "GO! click ZOOM click" stopwatch method of timing. All that effort wasted on inaccurate performance numbers. As we all know there are many quality in vehicle performance testing devices (even smart phone apps) out there that would have given them the real numbers. Still it was fun to watch and I guess thats where the money is.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
1996 Pontiac Bonneville SE 3.8L V6
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 12:09 PM   #32 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foothills near Denver
Posts: 277

RSX2fast4mpg - '02 RSX Type S
90 day: 37.22 mpg (US)

bubbatrucker - '98 K1500
90 day: 18.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
I enjoyed it. What they lacked in accuracy they made up for in number of different methods that all seemed to confirm the same conclusion. I despise their fuel measuring method and their data variance suggested it's a worthless method, but they keep going back to it rather than something more reliable, like a scangauge and longer test. Never the less, the coast down was the key method and confirmed all the other data.

Does it mean anything in the big picture? Heck no, but it was entertaining. I just wish they'd buy a scangauge, start doing some longer tests, and revisit the golfball theory. That was one of the more entertaining one's to date and despite all the arguments in opposition (followed that thread to its death), the data seemed significant enough to warrant a redo.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 04:16 PM   #33 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts
Flag mirrors would explain some of the difference between forward and backward drag.

Although not good forward, at least the shape is sorta convex. Backward makes it concave, with mirrors recessed ~5/8" into housings.

Remove the mirrors, run the tests again, and I bet the results would be even closer. Not that either direction is very good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 12:18 PM   #34 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,975
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 807 Times in 469 Posts
our own TV show

When someone else wins the Lottery and gives me a significant chunk of change,we'll do our own TV show,own mods,testing,and reporting.
I didn't see the show but it sounds like they did evaluations which weren't germane to the premise.Quasiscientainment.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 12:29 PM   #35 (permalink)
PSmodder lurker
 
botsapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 537
Thanks: 11
Thanked 154 Times in 93 Posts
Anyone w/ Solidworks CFD Flow Simulation? Just run an analysis and make demo for us. Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 07:08 PM   #36 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,533

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,019 Times in 568 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
When someone else wins the Lottery and gives me a significant chunk of change,we'll do our own TV show,own mods,testing,and reporting.
I'm in!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Replacing metal body panels with plastic silverhawk_184 EcoModding Central 8 12-07-2010 07:18 PM
Drag Racing Aero Help Bennett_Racing Aerodynamics 33 06-28-2010 06:02 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com