Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-07-2018, 07:31 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 939

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 31.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 179
Thanked 364 Times in 234 Posts
I have Nokian Hakkapellitas on my truck. They are stamped Ultra Low Rolling Resistance on the sidewalls.

__________________
The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 10,708.4 miles in 2017 at 35.5 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-09-2018, 08:03 PM   #22 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 248

Lone Ranger - '97 Ford Ranger XLT step-side
90 day: 28 mpg (US)

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 30.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts
Just looking through Tire Rack for LRR tires. If you search for LRR truck tires many come up (even some in your size), but when you start clicking on the specs and sizes, you find that the tire has LRR sizes, just not YOUR SIZE. I could only find one tire in my size, or anything close enough to not throw off the speedo by more than 5%.

General Grabber HTS. 30 Lbs, 44 psi max pressure, and interestingly it says they have a 9" section width. (Maybe CapriRacer is on to something.) The have fairly good weather ratings. Not quite as good as my other choices, but if the LRR is that big a benefit, then this becomes my best option.

The other two choices I am considering are........

Firestone Destination A/T 205/75/15 24 Lbs, 44 psi max pressure, 6.3" section width.

Kumho Crugen HT 51 225/70/15 27 Lbs, 51 psi max pressure, 7.1" section width.

Both of the other choices have excellent ratings in weather and comfort and tread wear. The Grabbers don't rank quite as high but aren't down very far.

If you had to make the choice.........which would you go with?


Thanks
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2018, 05:00 PM   #23 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: arkansas
Posts: 225

"Proper Shitbox" (SOLD) - '96 Honda Civic LX fully optioned no weight reduction
90 day: 41.9 mpg (US)

Plue Brius - '10 Toyota Prius II
90 day: 49.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 82
Thanked 29 Times in 22 Posts
What are you looking for? What size tire do you currently have? The reason why that is your ranger weighs about as much as a 4 door civic. I dont think you need ultra high load ratings either since your payload cap is nothing too.

__________________
2010 Prius. 36W low beams. 185 LRR tires. Aero wheel covers. CR 70 windshield. CR 40 side window. Passenger mirror & wiper delete. Antenna stick removed. Rear wiper & Squirter delete. 50lb weight reduction. 2" hitch.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com