Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register
Now


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-05-2008, 07:55 PM   #21 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Motor City
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Video is the plan: "web cam on a stick!" (Duct taped to the side of the car.)
I hope that stick doesn't kick up enough vortices on its own that it messes up the flow over the body. Maybe you should use a chase car and video from that.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 01:22 AM   #22 (permalink)
Cd
no
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 437

- - '93 Civic DX hatchback
Oh boy, oh boy,oh boy.

Can't wait to see this !!

One of the guys here ( millenniumtree ) suggested using audio tape insted of yarn .
My previous tuft tests showed that sewing yarn seems to cause vortexes for the tufts further downwind. Also, the yarn tends to stick to itself and those surrounding it at as you get up to speed, thereby ruining the test.
I had better luck with thick cotton thread.
I must give millenniumtree credit for the audio tape idea - it fits completely flush with the body of the car, yet flutters like mad in a turbulent area,
Just out of curiousity, I cut up some 2'1/2 " strips of tape from a video cassette and applied then to my car as i took a short drive. They seem to work just as well, yet are easier to see....but not on a black car like you have.
As I'm sure you remember, audio cassette film mainly comes in a dark brow color, but I remember tapes that had the film being white as well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 01:33 AM   #23 (permalink)
Cd
no
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 437

- - '93 Civic DX hatchback
Quote:
Originally Posted by garys_1k View Post
I hope that stick doesn't kick up enough vortices on its own that it messes up the flow over the body. Maybe you should use a chase car and video from that.
As long as the stick is not in the airflow area that he is filming he should be fine.
Trying to get a chase car together is a real pain because it requires three people to do it right : two drivers and a camera-man.
Another benefit of using a webcam is that they are so small that they can be used to do tuft testing underneath the car. ( Or even in the wheel wells if the camera is small enough. )
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 02:40 AM   #24 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Motor City
Posts: 88
Yeah, I thought about that later. If he has the camera on the left side of the car and monitors the tufts mainly on the right side roof, no problem.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 04:20 AM   #25 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,682

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Wagon SW2
90 day: 43.03 mpg (US)
.Cd -

Quote:
Originally Posted by .Cd View Post
...

Just out of curiousity, I cut up some 2'1/2 " strips of tape from a video cassette and applied then to my car as i took a short drive. They seem to work just as well, yet are easier to see....but not on a black car like you have.
As I'm sure you remember, audio cassette film mainly comes in a dark brow color, but I remember tapes that had the film being white as well.
This is cool. I was thinking of X-Mas tree tinsel, but that's crinkly. Audio/Video tape is smooth, so I think it is better for staying flush to the car.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 07:32 AM   #26 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Waikele, Hawaii
Posts: 108

88CRX - '88 CRX Standard DX
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IS250 - '07 IS250
90 day: 25.79 mpg (US)

RX300 - '00 RX300
90 day: 18.38 mpg (US)
how about a VW Beetle? it seems like the original VW would have a low Cd.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 10:33 AM   #27 (permalink)
Cd
no
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 437

- - '93 Civic DX hatchback
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
.Cd -



This is cool. I was thinking of X-Mas tree tinsel, but that's crinkly. Audio/Video tape is smooth, so I think it is better for staying flush to the car.

CarloSW2

Let me add a disclaimer : I tested only a few strips at the base and middle of my winshield and drove for all of a mile and a half. I placed some of the strips directly behind my winshield wiper and noticed severe flutter once I reached anything past ten or so MPH. This is good for indicating that there is drag in this region, but I wonder if the cotton thread would show the direction of the vortexes better.
Sorry - I was keeping my eyes on the road in front of me vs. on the test.

After running prior tuft tests with the car, I saw the direction in which the flow traveled along the windshield.
(As you know, sometimes air will travel in directions that you would never imagine it would. Sometimes it will even reverse itself.)
To test how these strips would handle this kind of situation, I intentionally placed some of the strips perpendiculal to the airflow.
( I placed them vertically where I knew from the previous testing that the airflow was horizonatal.) I found that the strips fold over themselves and accurately show the true direction.

Still, I wanted to add that I did a really quick, sloppy test. The experts ( used to ) use yarn. Apparently there is a reason they dont use the tape.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 10:45 AM   #28 (permalink)
Cd
no
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 437

- - '93 Civic DX hatchback
The AeroCivic looks even better when you compare the entire profile of the tail :

( A perfect match in fact ! )
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 02:03 PM   #29 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,017

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by garys_1k View Post
Yeah, I thought about that later. If he has the camera on the left side of the car and monitors the tufts mainly on the right side roof, no problem.
That's pretty much what I did - set up from above, to the side and slightly behind the area in question:



I just got in from some runs and got some cool pics and video. I'll post later.

I won't keep you in suspense though: there appears to be attached flow on the top, but not on the sides (on the sides, I suspected I'd gone too far inside that ideal "tear drop").
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tuft-webcam-setup-above.jpg (50.2 KB, 307 views)
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 10:15 PM   #30 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,017

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
I'm revising my evaluation about the "side panel": the turbulence is from the outside mirror! I forgot to fold it in when I ran the tests (I usually fold it back at highway speeds).

I did a few more runs comparing mirror deployed to mirror folded to window up/down, the difference is clear. I'm putting together a video now to post on YouTube...

There's still a little wiggle in the yarn, but none more than what I'm seeing on the side glass ahead of the Kamm back (got some shots of that too).
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 10:43 PM   #31 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Motor City
Posts: 88
Nice! Can't wait to see the vids, your work is inspiring. My Focus is pretty much as far along in the front as I can (want to) take it, I'm sure the back needs cleaning up and that's likely where it could do the most good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:06 AM   #32 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,017

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Here it is:

__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:46 AM   #33 (permalink)
Cd
no
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 437

- - '93 Civic DX hatchback
Very profesionally done !

Thanks for posting !
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:47 AM   #34 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,017

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Cd View Post
One of the guys here ( millenniumtree ) suggested using audio tape insted of yarn .
I've used audio tape before as "telltales" on a sail. Works really well, but the downside is it seems to have a serious static cling problem in certain conditions.

Also, not so good on a sail if you're used to red & green telltales on either side.
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:54 AM   #35 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,682

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Wagon SW2
90 day: 43.03 mpg (US)
MetroMPG -

Great stuff. The camera mounted on the car is the best POV for tuft testing.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:56 AM   #36 (permalink)
Cd
no
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 437

- - '93 Civic DX hatchback
So is the Kamm back going to have a hollow cavity or a plexiglass rear window ( the red portion of the image )

If you remember, the UCDavis project car had a small cavity ...but then their .Cd count wasn't exactly impressive for the amount of work that they put into that car.


Last edited by Cd; 07-07-2008 at 01:17 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 12:57 AM   #37 (permalink)
Cd
no
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 437

- - '93 Civic DX hatchback
Hey - I love the look of the car by the way.
Man what a difference !


I have a new question : I noticed that in the still pictures ( the one that I posted in my previous post ) the area on the side of the Kamm back isn't filled in. ( The triangular area just above the area that I filled in with red )
Surely you filled in this side piece before the test ... right ?

Last edited by Cd; 07-07-2008 at 02:03 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 02:54 AM   #38 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina SK Canada
Posts: 402

High School Bike - '98 Typhoon

Speed Bike - '79 Arcadia
This is such a great video! Real professional and it worked extremely well. Are you thinking of pushing the envelope further and making an attachable boat-tail in the future? I'm totally staying tuned .
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 03:00 AM   #39 (permalink)
Veggiedynamics
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 658

Extreme CRX-HF - '87 CRX custom areo
90 day: 50.8 mpg (US)
thats awsome what did you use to mount your camera for the testo do the same form my setup for tuff testing.. how did you mount that camera!!!!!!!
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 04:43 AM   #40 (permalink)
X-Frenchy: very
 
groar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toulouse, France
Posts: 230

scenic - '01 scenic
90 day: 46.29 mpg (US)

megane - '97 megane classic
90 day: 45.96 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Here it is:
Great job :-)

This gives me more and more desire to ecomod my car...
but I will only begin with front grill block and may try rear wheel skirts : your DIY article seams so easy to follow...

Have you ever tuff tested your rear wheel skirts or your front grill block ?

Denis.
__________________
Save money & CO2 at home : http://ecorenovator.org/
Created and managed by the creators of http://ecomodder.com/
---
Earth absorbs 1.8 t CO2/head/yr
kg saved 2008/06-11 : 367.2 (ecodriving) + 118.6 (440 m not driven)

  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mullet's Metro Project Johnny Mullet EcoModding Central 261 11-26-2008 07:22 AM
Geo Metro XFI Convertible Project Finished Coyote X EcoModding Central 222 11-10-2008 12:01 AM
Why I'm Choosing a Civic Over a Metro Wayneburg General Efficiency Discussion 35 09-22-2008 03:52 PM
$10 Metro on Craigslist. Project car, anyone? MetroMPG The Lounge 5 01-16-2008 12:15 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
All content copyright EcoModder.com