Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-23-2014, 05:01 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Denmark
Posts: 4

VW Up! - '14 VW Up!
90 day: 50.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Pulse and glide test results: VW Up!

Hello fellow ecodrivers

I tested P&G, in my stock VW Up! (1,0 liters gasoline, 60 BHP), versus driving with constant speed. The average speed of all runs was 50 km/h (30 MPH).
Since my car is stock, the glides was performed with engine idling.
The pulses was from 24 MPH -> 36 MPH.

The test course was 2,2 miles of smooth tarmac, without elevation and lights, no traffic interfering and a few 30MPH bumps.
Engine warm, calm and dry weather and temperatur around 20 *C.
I havent bought a Scanguage yet, so the test was performed with the factory installed trip computer, which is shows a fuel consumption approx 5% lower than reality.
This is the measurement from my 4 runs:
1 out: Constant speed: 2,70 l/100km (87,1 MPG (us))
2 back: Pulse and glide: 2,80 l/100km (84,0 MPG (us))
3 out: Pulse and glide: 2,80 l/100km
4 back: Constant speed: 2,70 l/100km

Afterwards I wanted to calculate potential fuel saving, if I was able to turn the engine off.
By observing pulse and glide times and consumption, during the tests, I calculated theoretical P&G fuel consumptions with engine idling and engine off during the glides.
Calculated fuel consumption with P&G with engine idling: 2,89 l/100km
Calculated fuel consumption with P&G with engine off: 2,11 l/100km

The result: P&G in the test showed an increased fuel consumption 3-4% compared to driving with constant speed.

If I was able to turn off the engine of during P&G, I would certainly get lower fuel consumption.
From my guesstimations it would result in a 20-30 % decrease in fuel consumption compared to constant speed.


Last edited by Retardosaurus; 07-23-2014 at 05:42 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Retardosaurus For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (07-25-2014)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-23-2014, 08:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Thanks for the results.

Bare in mind that instrumentation's accuracy (factory or SG), will vary depending on how the car is driven.

On my Fiat the factory display is about 2% optimistic for most drivers, but for us Eco types it's actually about 2% pessimistic. Same goes for SG, it's only accurate once you calibrate it to your driving style, change style and the calibration goes out. It can make you think you're saving fuel with a new technique until you fill up and realise it was just a way of fooling the instruments.

I've found that engine on P&G just doesn't work on the Fiat's little 2cyl engine (too light and poor aero), can't really do EOC because it's a turbo. It's the car that can't be hypermilled.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2014, 09:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
What is it about your Up that prevents you from stopping the engine?
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2014, 10:29 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Denmark
Posts: 4

VW Up! - '14 VW Up!
90 day: 50.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
What is it about your Up that prevents you from stopping the engine?
I dont wanna mod my new car with a kill switch, since its brand new and its everyday car. And I dont like turning the ignition off and risking locking the steering wheel.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2014, 10:49 AM   #5 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
Fair enough.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2014, 09:08 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retardosaurus View Post
I dont wanna mod my new car with a kill switch, since its brand new and its everyday car. And I dont like turning the ignition off and risking locking the steering wheel.
Kind of a shame because in my Fiat with EPAS, the EPAS continues to work in EOC. In fact it does the opposite of what most cars would do and goes into parking mode which makes the steering extemely light. I don't really EOC out of sympathy for the turbo though.

__________________






  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com