Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-31-2009, 11:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 497

wood hauler - '91 F-250
90 day: 22.06 mpg (US)

3800 Sunfire - '02 Sunfire
Thanks: 27
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Question for you guys that have removed power steering

is it any easier to turn the wheels after you unhook the lines as opposed to before, when the engine isn't running? What i mean is do you have to fight the pump before, vs not after? if it is the same i had better keep ps.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 3.55 10.25" rear.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 11:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
I removed the PS on both my Civic's, all my CRX's and several of my trucks. I really don't like PS, honestly, except in extremely heavy vehicles, it's nice.

I never really noticed that it was any harder to turn the wheel after the removal than it was while sitting w/ the engine off before removing the pump.

I also never crossed the PS lines, I just drained the fluid from the rack and put caps on the nipples that the lines attach to on the rack. PS racks aren't lubricated by PS fluid, they're driven by it.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 11:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
Hybrid Student Driver
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,715

Teggy - '98 Integra LS
90 day: 33.02 mpg (US)

IMA - '010 Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 45.43 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 TSX Base
90 day: 28.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
I removed the PS on both my Civic's, all my CRX's and several of my trucks. I really don't like PS, honestly, except in extremely heavy vehicles, it's nice.

I never really noticed that it was any harder to turn the wheel after the removal than it was while sitting w/ the engine off before removing the pump.

I also never crossed the PS lines, I just drained the fluid from the rack and put caps on the nipples that the lines attach to on the rack. PS racks aren't lubricated by PS fluid, they're driven by it.
Any adverse effects on either vehicle with the removal of the pump? Accelerated wear?

RH77
__________________
Supporting those devastated by the Joplin Tornado
EF5 / 22-May-2011


_
_
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 11:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RH77 View Post
Any adverse effects on either vehicle with the removal of the pump? Accelerated wear?

RH77
I can't answer that with anything but opinion. I didn't drive/own them long enough, but based on the number of people I've seen do it for years and having driven some of those cars as well, I'd have to say no. (In my opinion.)

I can say that I'd rather have a manual rack to begin with, because of the (usually) shorter rack ratio.

My dad's 198? Ford Bronco II also never had PS fluid in it, and thus, had power steering w/o power assist. It only really sucked on cold days when stopped or moving very slowly, and even then, it was just like steering a tractor at speed... not really all that bad.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 11:42 PM   #5 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 497

wood hauler - '91 F-250
90 day: 22.06 mpg (US)

3800 Sunfire - '02 Sunfire
Thanks: 27
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
the only reason i sak is because...

my car weighs 4,000 LBS with me in it and the wheels are almost impossible to turn with engine off and not moving. I was wondering if i am fighting the pump at all or if maybe its just telling me to leave ps in.....
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 3.55 10.25" rear.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 11:44 PM   #6 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
You're not fighting the pump, you're fighting the fluid movement.

Best way to test would be to drain the fluid, then reconnect the hoses. You're probably still going to have a difficult time with it, though. Fluid doesn't make up that much of the difference.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 11:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 497

wood hauler - '91 F-250
90 day: 22.06 mpg (US)

3800 Sunfire - '02 Sunfire
Thanks: 27
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
so i might as well leave it in?

my wife does drive it sometimes...
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 3.55 10.25" rear.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 11:46 PM   #8 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
Unless your wife is Beth Phoenix, forget it.

If you wanted to mod it so that you don't have to have the PS pump running all the time, you can use a clutched pulley that only activates when powered, like the pulley on an A/C pump. This comes with it's own obvious problems, though.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 11:48 PM   #9 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 497

wood hauler - '91 F-250
90 day: 22.06 mpg (US)

3800 Sunfire - '02 Sunfire
Thanks: 27
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
guess i'll just have to make it up elsewhere...

can i even get a manual rack for a 1996 olds 88????
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 3.55 10.25" rear.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 11:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 497

wood hauler - '91 F-250
90 day: 22.06 mpg (US)

3800 Sunfire - '02 Sunfire
Thanks: 27
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
the owners manual says it has magnasteer, is that variable assist?

or is it constant flow/pressure


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 3.55 10.25" rear.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Paul & Sabrina's cheap DIY 144v motor controller MPaulHolmes Open ReVolt: open source DC motor controller 5824 Yesterday 04:25 PM
Power Steering delete for fuel economy gain - anyone done it? bennelson EcoModding Central 66 03-28-2012 08:06 AM
Converting power steering to electric power steering Daox EcoModding Central 38 01-16-2012 07:53 AM
Toyota Echo power steering delete mod? zman EcoModding Central 29 05-17-2009 08:36 PM
Removed '00 Civic power steering belt and got good results but... hondaworkshop EcoModding Central 8 10-07-2008 01:23 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com