Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Off-Topic Tech
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-20-2009, 03:54 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 465
Thanks: 9
Thanked 36 Times in 28 Posts
57.9% increase in fuel economy (last paragraph) !

Detroit will be knocking this guy's door down to get the "secret"!

Pete.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 03:36 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 347
Thanks: 25
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
yeah there are all these super easy ways that GM could be making their cars get 60mpg, they're just too stupid to figure out stuff that guys in garages with little pvc pipes throw together in one afternoon!

And sure they would sell more cars than anyone else on the planet if they just dusted off all the top secret technology they're obviously sitting on to make cars get 300mpg, but they figure they'll just roll around in bankruptcy land on purpose for giggles.
__________________
2001 ZR2 Blazer e85/gas flex
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shovel For This Useful Post:
mcrews (01-29-2012)
Old 05-03-2011, 10:44 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Above the below
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ram Air Intake Scoop

I installed a ram air intake scoop on my four wheel drive 2004 Toyota Tundra Double Cab a few years back. Changes I recorded:
  • 1.5-2 MPG increase depending on driving conditions
  • Truck stopped downshifting on hills
  • Better passing power from 50 to 90 MPH

The ram air intake scoop gathers and forces somewhere in the area of 11 times more air than the engine can ingest at 70 MPH.

There is a website that claims mounting a ram air intake scoop below the bumper places it in a region of negative pressure or vacuum but this does not hold true for my truck. Using a homemade manometer I recorded 3.5 water inches of pressure in this area running the highway at 70 MPH. The scoop connects directly to the stock air box with a True Flow drop in-filter.

I have never been able to draw (or force) water up into the air box or engine - even in driving through six inches of standing water. I would not have done this deliberately but I was trapped in my lane with nowhere to go.

I had pictures to post but they are too big. I would provide links to the pictures but I have not made five posts yet.

Last edited by highwaylizard; 05-03-2011 at 10:48 PM.. Reason: Pictures did not post
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 11:39 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Zerohour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 313

Pooparu - '01 Outback Limited
90 day: 28.12 mpg (US)

Cop Car - '94 Caprice Interceptor 9C1
Last 3: 18.48 mpg (US)

Mini - '011 Cooper
90 day: 37.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 16 Times in 9 Posts
From someone who has fitted a ram air system to a V6 FWD, yep it makes a difference.

And with small displacement motor, and the air only entering through the ram air vents, you damn well better believe you'll feel 300-400CFM being pulled in at WOT. Its pretty close to a small air blower that would be used in a home hvac system...the kind that moves air from your heater throughout your house.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 12:15 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 1,005

The Q - '02 Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 260
Thanked 123 Times in 86 Posts
I really hate to ask this.......but the evil spirit in my brain demands it........

WHat 'simple' person would run their vehicle at WOT long enough for it to matter??????

Please........stop.
really.

If you are legitamately here for mpg, why would you care!!!!!????
I have the baddest sedan on this site. V8 w/ 340hp Tons of torgue, 3800 lb curb weight. sub 6 second 0-60 from the factory.
in 230,000 I have been at wot 1 time. And that was to scare the crap uot of my then 17 yr old daughter.
__________________
ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First, Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Second, Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

third, rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip! http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 12:21 AM   #16 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
I actually go WOT on occasion. Or full pedal, as it were. Many of the people here are also engine performance enthusiasts. Its a pretty large field of oberst and expertise on this site, and fuel economy is just a common factor between us all, or most of us.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 12:48 AM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Above the below
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews View Post
I really hate to ask this.......but the evil spirit in my brain demands it........

WHat 'simple' person would run their vehicle at WOT long enough for it to matter??????

Please........stop.
really.

If you are legitamately here for mpg, why would you care!!!!!????
I have the baddest sedan on this site. V8 w/ 340hp Tons of torgue, 3800 lb curb weight. sub 6 second 0-60 from the factory.
in 230,000 I have been at wot 1 time. And that was to scare the crap uot of my then 17 yr old daughter.
Not sure if you are referring to me or not. At any rate - do you define WOT by zero vacuum or by Throttle Position?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 12:54 AM   #18 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
I would like to ask if you have any sets of data or repeatable testing protocols from which we can make our own inferences?

And I'm fairly certain he didn't mean you.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 12:56 AM   #19 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
Also - WOT is normally defined as the throttle setting wherein the throttling device poses the least possible (unmodified) restriction to intake flow. Normally, when the skinny pedal is on the deck.

Zero vacuum can be achieved under any throttle setting, and thus, is a function of load, rather than throttle.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 03:24 AM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 9
Thanked 74 Times in 62 Posts
Ram air is a misnomer (thank you GM marketing) but a large forward facing intake helped improve FE on 3 cars so far vs the stock intake setup. There is less down shifting involved in normal driving and I can use WOT or near wot in high gear at low RPM more often. The tradeoff is that the airbox accumulates more dirt.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Honda IACV explained TomO Off-Topic Tech 10 11-25-2011 01:59 PM
WAI vs Ram Air Intake --- at speed... basslover911 EcoModding Central 33 07-17-2009 07:34 PM
Comparing Warm Air Intakes (WAI) & Cold Air Intakes (CAI) toomuch EcoModding Central 22 04-07-2009 10:30 PM
Grill block affected milleage mar5ka Aerodynamics 24 08-31-2008 11:17 AM
Moving air intake into the engine compartment? pasadena_commut Aerodynamics 5 07-25-2008 04:24 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com