  |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post: | aerohead  (01-27-2014) |
01-27-2014, 01:29 AM
|
#316 (permalink) |
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
For some reason my post above is all skewed all over the place.
There is an even better quality video on Vimeo, but I can't hotlink it, so here a regular link : 2013 Ford Fusion Aerodynamics Demonstration on Vimeo ( Is it just me or does this guy look a lot like Bassjoos  ) |
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post: | aerohead (01-27-2014) |
|
01-27-2014, 01:35 AM
|
#317 (permalink) | |
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe Team Honda 90 day: 66.42 mpg (US) Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike 90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US) Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.  
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2014, 01:39 AM
|
#318 (permalink) |
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Here is an article about that very question :5 Ways Ford Made the 2013 Fusion Sleeker - TheStreet
QUOTE : The work is expected to result in a 10% reduction in aerodynamic drag, which would lead to a 2.5% fuel efficiency improvement in highway mileage. Highway mileage for the standard 2012 Fusion is 33 miles per gallon, or 36 miles per gallon for the hybrid version. Of the projected drag reduction improvement in the 2013 model, 41% would result from the improved underbody shields, 36% from styling changes and 23% from active grille shutters. Note that there are 3 pages to the article, so look for the link at the bottom. |
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post: | aerohead (02-01-2014) |
|
01-27-2014, 05:19 PM
|
#319 (permalink) | |
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
|
C-pillar
Quote:
|
|
01-27-2014, 05:32 PM
|
#320 (permalink) | |
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
|
mpg gain
Quote:
The old school values are: *10% delta CdA = 5% mpg @ 55-mph *10% delta CdA = 6% mpg @ 70-mph *I suspect that the 10% = 2.5% is actually for the Urban cycle.Journalists have reported things like this so many times in the past, so as to make readers/consumers believe that aero drag is essentially inconsequential.And without a rebuttal,they may go on believing it for the rest of time. 
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/ |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post: | California98Civic  (01-27-2014) |
.jpg)
Today
Other popular topics in this forum...
