Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2013, 06:26 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: World
Posts: 385
Thanks: 82
Thanked 82 Times in 67 Posts
Definitely cost. Back when most of the Japanese manufacturers had systems, it was used as a marketing tool. Often the cars would have decals on the bottom of the doors with all the acronyms - ABS, 4WS, 4WD - for the features so the customer could be reminded of where the money went.

There were various ways to achieve the rear wheel steering. Some used hydraulics but Honda's was a purely mechanical system with an additional shaft to the back of the car. That operated a worm and peg mechanism. At large steering angles the rear wheels steered in the opposite direction to the fronts, to decrease the turning circle. At small steering angles the rear wheels steered in the same direction as the fronts to improve grip.

The hydraulic systems could be speed based. Some only steered the rear wheels in the same direction as the fronts, some also did the rear wheels out trick.

The now unheralded passive systems rely on the deflection of the (quite sophisticated in design) suspension bushes under cornering forces to alter the angles of the rear wheels.


Last edited by Occasionally6; 08-25-2013 at 06:34 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-25-2013, 10:21 PM   #12 (permalink)
Lots of Questions
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665

Motor-Rolla - '01 Toyota Corolla LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 28.3 mpg (US)

Gaia - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 19.78 mpg (US)

Gaia - Round 2 - '99 Toyota 4runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
Thanks for the replies guys. I didn't know that AWS was so prevalent in certain areas of the world. It's interesting to note how many different systems there are for the same end goal (much like the rest of cars' various mechanisms).

The reason I thought you wouldn't need as much PS is because with extra turning from the rear wheels, I thought it would help make steering easier. Is that wrong in thinking? Would 2 extra 'pieces' of friction actually make it harder to turn without PS?
__________________
Don't forget to like our Facebook page!




Best EM Quotes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
It has been said, that if you peel the duct tape back on Earth's equator, you'll find that the two hemispheres are held together with J B Weld.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan9 View Post
subscribed with a soda.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
If you're burning,and someone throws gasoline on you,there will be a localized cooling effect, but you're still on fire.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2013, 12:29 AM   #13 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
Dunno how bad it is in the US, but here in Europe things can get so tight that when these big guys turn, a triple-axle trailer may actually see one or two of them reverse, and they scrub heavily in the process.

Not good for the tyres, and it certainly takes more fuel - but wether that's visible in the overall FC is doubtful, as they spend most of their time going more or less straight.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com