Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-21-2013, 02:23 AM   #71 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
It's one consequence of artificially lowering your maximum power output via a HAI/WAI.

Unfortunately, like my Dakota with its 45RFE or my Magnum with its 42RLE, many newer vehicles can't really use a manual valve body, because those vehicles have completely computer controlled automatic transmissions. I can compensate somewhat on the Dakota, because I have rigged up a simple circuit that tells the transmission computer that the throttle is less open than it really is. However, as the Magnum has an integrated transmission and engine computer module, that's not an option for the Magnum.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-21-2013, 12:00 PM   #72 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mechman600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,228

Fusion - '16 Ford Fusion Hybrid SE
Thanks: 190
Thanked 275 Times in 168 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by t vago View Post
I can compensate somewhat on the Dakota, because I have rigged up a simple circuit that tells the transmission computer that the throttle is less open than it really is. However, as the Magnum has an integrated transmission and engine computer module, that's not an option for the Magnum.
What determines the kickdown on the Magnum - TPS alone or a calculated load percentage? If it only the TPS, there might be a simple workaround. Simply create a manifold vacuum leak to the air box. That way the throttle angle will always be less at a given load than it normally would be and the transmission won't kick down as soon.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mechman600 For This Useful Post:
t vago (05-21-2013)
Old 05-21-2013, 12:43 PM   #73 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
You'd have to valve that, as well.. to control the air bleed, at least at first, until you learn how much compensation the PCM will add... at some point, it's going to say 'No way, Charlie!' and stop adding fuel, kick the CEL on and in some cases, drop into 'limp home' mode.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Christ For This Useful Post:
ECONORAM (05-28-2013), t vago (05-21-2013)
Old 05-21-2013, 02:02 PM   #74 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
What a great thread! Read through the whole thing, with thanks. Some confirmations and a question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by t vago View Post
The intake heater, as installed, appears to give a reliable 45 F delta T between the outside air temperature...
My WAI has tended to give me 30 degrees F over ambient. I have loosely observed that many times driving around listening to radio weather reports, public temp displays, and observing my IAT sensor readout on my ultragauge.

Quote:
Originally Posted by t vago View Post
Part Load Pumping Losses in an SI Engine ... Changes of Low Load Engine Parameters by Temperature of Mixture

I think that this paper is showing that the resulting gain in fuel economy from installing a HAI is a combination of the two factors.
That is useful to know. I have always just taken the line I learned from Daox about pumping losses as being the whole explanation.

A question: I did a WAI test myself two years ago on my MAP equipped Civic. The results confirm yours, though my IAT and FE gains were not as great. But had to use steady throttle position in the place of cruise control since I do not have CC. I saw a modest increase in what I thought was a fairly rigorous DIY test, but it has been suggested to me that using throttle position invalidates the results. [Here are the results. Any thoughts on the validity of my test?

Thanks.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
t vago (05-21-2013)
Old 05-21-2013, 10:39 PM   #75 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mechman600 View Post
Simply create a manifold vacuum leak to the air box. That way the throttle angle will always be less at a given load than it normally would be and the transmission won't kick down as soon.
As Christ said, it'd have to be trial and error with a valve. I'd likely see P0121 and P0221 codes if I caused too large of a vacuum leak. The engine computer compares throttle sensor positions against manifold air pressure sensor readings, and the throttle itself is one of them drive-by-wire types (not like in the Dakota, where I could spoof the throttle position as needed).
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 11:05 PM   #76 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
What a great thread! Read through the whole thing, with thanks.
Thanks! I've been wanting to get some sort of gathering of WAI information together in one place.

Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
My WAI has tended to give me 30 degrees F over ambient. I have loosely observed that many times driving around listening to radio weather reports, public temp displays, and observing my IAT sensor readout on my ultragauge.
I do the same thing. I monitor engine coolant temperature and intake air temperature fairly regularly. I've noticed that the temperature differential is lower as outside air temperature rises. Right now, I'm looking at about a 40 F difference. In the wintertime, it was more like 60 F.

Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
That is useful to know. I have always just taken the line I learned from Daox about pumping losses as being the whole explanation.
I thought the same thing, at first. However, when I first started testing a WAI in the Dakota, I noticed that the manifold pressure never really changed that much, nor did throttle position, yet I was still able to get as much as 6% improvement in fuel economy.

It may have something to do with warm air causing better atomization of fuel, perhaps. Or, as I have thought about over all this time, it could also be that since warmer air is less dense than colder air, for a given absolute pressure, it takes less energy to draw a vacuum with a WAI, than it would with a normal (or CAI). Or maybe it's a combination of both factors.

Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
A question: I did a WAI test myself two years ago on my MAP equipped Civic. The results confirm yours, though my IAT and FE gains were not as great. But had to use steady throttle position in the place of cruise control since I do not have CC. I saw a modest increase in what I thought was a fairly rigorous DIY test, but it has been suggested to me that using throttle position invalidates the results. [Here are the results. Any thoughts on the validity of my test?
Your results look good to me. In fact, that post of yours was one of several on this board, that led me on my own WAI path. So, my hat's off to you, sir.

Not sure how throttle position is supposed to invalidate your results, though. It looked like you tried to minimize the variability of other major factors involved (speed, distance traveled). *shrugs* Others here have also duplicated your results.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 10:55 AM   #77 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,530

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 39.03 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,251
Thanked 582 Times in 374 Posts
Awesome thread t vago!!!

I'm going to start on my WAI this weekend using my turbo as the heat source and by-passing the front mount inter-cooler. I might try to block it first but as Summer is almost here I'm sure I will need the air flow to get to the radiator.

I'm lucky when it comes to my car 1991 AWD Talon OBDI with ECM Link V3 SD management (will log over 40 different parameters including my wide band O2) and a re-chip TCU that has two options. Manual shift full line pressure so I can be in over drive at any speed/rpm and a race mode with preset shift points at full line pressure.

Since I installed the chip TCU I improve a ton on in city fuel mileage. What happen though is after the TCU chip install the stock converter was slipping at 20mph to 35mph in OD so I switch to John Deer HyGard fluid and it helps a ton with the converter slippage. Plus I use my car for racing also and HyGard is the new fluid that many racers are now using to handle the extreme loads that the trans is seeing at a much higher HP then stock.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2016, 07:24 PM   #78 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gumby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Butte, Montana
Posts: 725

little jona - '91 Dodge D 250 first gen cummins LE
Team Streamliner
90 day: 23.4 mpg (US)

Little Jona airo modded - '91 Dodge RAM 3/4 TON D 250 2×4 AUTO
Pickups
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

The Salted Hound Jenny. - '87 Dodge Ram 50/D-50 5sp 4X4
90 day: 20.24 mpg (US)

Jona Allison aero - '91 Dodge Ram D-250 Le
90 day: 20.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 208
Thanked 427 Times in 278 Posts
Any progress or is this project one for the bad idea pile. I hope progress.
__________________
1st gen cummins 91.5 dodge d250 ,HX35W/12/6 QSV
ehxsost manafulld wrap, Aero Tonto
best tank: distance 649gps mi 24.04 mpg 27.011usg
Best mpg : 31.32mpg 100mi 3.193 USG 5/2/20


Former
'83 GMC S-15 Jimmy 2door 2wd O/D auto 3.73R&P
'79 Chevy K20 4X4 350ci 400hp msd custom th400 /np205. 7.5-new 14mpg modded befor modding was a thing
87' Hyundai Excel
83 ranger w/87 2.9 L FI2wd auto 18mpg on the floor
04 Mitsubishi Gallant 2.4L auto 26mpg
06 Subaru Forrester XT(WRX PACKAGE) MT AWD Turbocharged 18 plying dirty best of 26mpg@70mph
95Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 14-18mpg
04 Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 16-22mpg


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2016, 06:58 AM   #79 (permalink)
Volvo-driving MachYeen
 
Fingie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 788

Neo Volvo - '98 Volvo S70 10V
90 day: 24.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 298
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
Same here. I had a short ram filter on the War Wagon before, which raised intake temps to even 90F. according to the OBD-II reading.

Later the car developed knocking, I got scared that I've raised the intake temps too much (it was the new plugs, I was an asshat to not check)

So I switched to CAI. intake temps are 71 F at about 32F

I am converting the car to ethanol gas very soon.

So do you people think WAI would help with FE, as ethanol is "leaner stuff) than gasoline and thus needs to be injected more.

Although E85 has a higher knock resistance compared to gasoline.
__________________
If you don't make any mistakes in your life,
life itself will be a f*ckup.



With Volvo to Valhalla and back!

Last edited by Fingie; 12-09-2016 at 07:03 AM.. Reason: get schwifty
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2016, 11:15 AM   #80 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Alcohol takes a lot more latent heat to vaporize it.
A warm air intake seems like it would be a good idea for an alcohol engine that you want to have good fuel economy.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
air, dodge, hot, intake, warm





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com