Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-24-2010, 07:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 93
Thanks: 9
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Reducing the energy loss due to A/C

Why do car makers not heat and cool our cars like we do our homes? In my home during the summer, I don't regulate the temperature in a room by running the A/C all of the time and when it gets too cool I turn on the furnace, I just turn off the A/C. Why do we regulate the temperature in our cars by running the A/C all of the time at maximum power then moderate the temperature with hot water from the engine. Why not automatically cycle the A/C on and off to maintain the temperature like your furnace does at home in the winter?

This is the technique that I use to help reduce fuel consumption, but making it automatic would allow the manufacturer to raise their CAFE ratings.

I'm sure that it wouldn't cost too much since you already have temperature sensors all over your car already. And software doesn't add weight.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2010, 08:38 AM   #2 (permalink)
Absent without leave.
 
Arragonis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Englishman living in Scotland
Posts: 3,365

George - '011 Aygo Go!
Team m8
90 day: 54.54 mpg (US)

Mildred - '011 Prius T-Spirit
90 day: 45.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 168
Thanked 250 Times in 187 Posts
The hot water from the engine is there all the time anyway, so no additional energy in making that.

Some cars with climate control with air con do that automatically - turn the AC on and off. You can cycle your air con manually to do the same thing. I've seem some advice about not running it when accelerating in a low power car.
__________________
No longer here. Bye, and good luck to all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2010, 04:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,724

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 459 Times in 315 Posts
rbrowning -

What Arragonis said. Newer cars (not mine) are cycling the A/C to save fuel.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2010, 11:42 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: belgium, wi
Posts: 262

Bus - '94 School Bus huge

Stupid - '01 Blazer LS
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)

hawk - '00 Superhawk
Thanks: 2
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Pop your hood and run your AC full tilt. You should see the AC clutch engage and disengage as needed. This does mean that the AC is not running all the time. As for heat, like it was said above.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2010, 01:05 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 484

Bonnie - '98 Bonneville SSE
3800
90 day: 26.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
Some cars also control the A/C by TPS% although the ones I have seen are set to high (from factory) like turn off at 94% throttle.
__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2010, 07:49 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 93
Thanks: 9
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
I realized that the heat was "free", but I was not aware that the A/C compressor was cycling. I turn mine off and on manually to maintain a reasonably comfortable temperature and have been doing so for years. I have never heard my engine speed change so I'm not sure if the A/C isn't drawing much power or if it isn't cycling off and on.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2010, 10:43 AM   #7 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
TSV = "Throttle Suction Valve" modulation, for those wondering.

...part of "automatic" A/C control system; TPS is part of "engine" control system.

Last edited by Old Tele man; 07-27-2010 at 03:41 PM.. Reason: corrected TPS to TSV
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2010, 02:24 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 484

Bonnie - '98 Bonneville SSE
3800
90 day: 26.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
TPS = Throttle position sensor

Or at least thats the only way I have seen it used.
__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2010, 03:20 PM   #9 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 829

The Van - '97 Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Max - '98 Maxima SE
90 day: 26.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbrowning View Post
I realized that the heat was "free", but I was not aware that the A/C compressor was cycling. I turn mine off and on manually to maintain a reasonably comfortable temperature and have been doing so for years. I have never heard my engine speed change so I'm not sure if the A/C isn't drawing much power or if it isn't cycling off and on.
Your method of manually cycling on and off does work most economically, but it can get annoying on a long trip.

In my van (with manual controls) I run the blowers until a comfortable temp is reached, then turn the blowers down to minumum setting. There are temp sensors designed to keep the condensor from freezing up, and by slowing down the air flow, the condensor gets cold faster, and cycles the compressor off more frequently. Most of the time this maintains a comfortable temperature.
__________________

Gotta love wife, kids, and car!


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2010, 03:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Before I had cruise control added to my car, I had never been able to spot a difference in FE with or without airco.
On CC however, fuel consumption will instantly drop 0.2 to 0.3 L/100 km - around 6% - when shutting the AC down - that's a 3 mpg increase in FE.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone tried HHO on a diesel? j.kansas EcoModding Central 97 12-27-2011 11:58 AM
New CVT transmission electric-assist with electric assist Ptero Fossil Fuel Free 2 09-23-2010 10:41 PM
The Mechanism Behind Flow Separation LostCause Aerodynamics 46 07-15-2010 07:38 AM
Geothermal energy? DifferentPointofView Saving@Home 46 02-05-2009 10:15 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com