Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-25-2018, 10:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 475

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 91 Times in 72 Posts
Relationship between vacuum and FE? New questions

Can someone please help me out with the relationship between vacuum and FE? I'm not really sure exactly what vacuum's function is in an engine either. IIRC low vacuum is the engine running more efficiently right? I have an idea for a mod/improvement but I'm not quite sure how to implement it. I wanted to ask about it, but need to understand how vacuum works and the terminology first.

Basically, I want to temporarily hook up a vacuum gauge and see what RPM range my engine likes. The "sweet spot" so to speak. Then some fancy ciphering using my tire size and transmission gear ratios and various rear end gears to try and get as close to that "sweet spot" at 55-60 mph in 4th gear and 65-70 in 5th gear. Maybe Ford has already done that, I don't know.

I guess it all starts with finding out where my engine is happiest. That's where learning about vacuum comes in.

Thanks

__________________
If nice guys finish last, are you willing to pay the price to finish first ?





Last edited by hat_man; 05-01-2018 at 08:17 PM.. Reason: More questions
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-26-2018, 12:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,548
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,622 Times in 1,447 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hat_man View Post
I'm not really sure exactly what vacuum's function is in an engine either.
Apart from some older ignition systems that relied on vacuum to variate the timing, I don't remind any other utility for it in the engine. Well, on the other hand it does work as a power source for brake servos and other auxiliary systems...


Quote:
IIRC low vacuum is the engine running more efficiently right?
Low vacuum is a result of fewer restrictions at the intake, such as a wide-open throttle valve, thus the engine in fact runs more efficient because it has to do fewer work to intake a given amount of air (leading to smaller "pumping losses").
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
hat_man (04-26-2018)
Old 04-26-2018, 06:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
teoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,245

A3 - '12 Audi A3
Thanks: 65
Thanked 225 Times in 186 Posts
Your engine sucks in air as the piston moves down. Same way as you suck in air as your diaphragm contracts to make your lungs more voluminous.

Gasoline engines run at a fairly fixed air fuel ratio. So every bit of air has a bit of gasoline injected to it and the ratio is constant.

So the wat the engine power/speed is controlled is by a valve to limit the incoming air. (Valve is connected to the gas pedal.
You can imagine this as you wanting to run like Forest Gump but some one controls your speed by closing your mouth.


Obviously trying to breathe with a semi closed mouth is not optimal because you have to suck in air through a restriction which wastes energy. Same applies to an engine. The vacuum gauge is measuring the air pressure in your mouth. The less it is, the more efficiently the engine runs.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to teoman For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (04-27-2018), hat_man (04-29-2018)
Old 04-26-2018, 07:10 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 475

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 91 Times in 72 Posts
Thank you Cripple Rooster.

My thoughts were this.....

Let's assume that my engine really likes the 2000-2200 rpm range verified by my temporary vacuum gauge hook up. 55 mph in 5th gear gives me this range with my current tire size (already 5% larger than stock) and rear gear (3:73). 15 miles of my drive every day is at 65-70 mph. Even in 5th gear it's nearly 3000 rpm and I'm sure not very fuel efficient. If I do some math I might find that swapping to say a 3:55 or 3:45 rear gear may give me the magical 2100 rpm range at 55 mph but in 4th gear rather than 5th, and the same 2100 rpm range at 65 mph in 5th gear. This would give me optimal FE for the whole drive to work except for the short in town bits. Maybe I'd get lucky and 3rd gear would be my <40 mph gear. I just need to find the optimal rpm range for each gear and speed and then get out the pencil and paper.
__________________
If nice guys finish last, are you willing to pay the price to finish first ?




  Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2018, 07:11 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 475

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 91 Times in 72 Posts
Thanks teoman.
__________________
If nice guys finish last, are you willing to pay the price to finish first ?




  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2018, 11:23 AM   #6 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,548
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,622 Times in 1,447 Posts
Too bad it's not easy to find a dual-speed rear axle for a Ranger, isn't it? BTW doesn't your '03 have an electronically-controlled throttle plate instead of a cable-operated one? Maybe that could allow you to get it tuned to remain wide-open at a broader RPM band.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2018, 12:08 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
Please review:

- Classic-Car-Magazine - Tuning with a Vacuum Gauge

Quote:
The Vacuum gauge is a useful instrument to have on any classic as it can be used to tune for power, diagnose engine faults and for maintaining fuel economy.
This article will cover tuning, with articles below about how to diagnose common engine problems using your vacuum gauge.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
hat_man (04-29-2018)
Old 04-27-2018, 01:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Great description, teoman.

On the point of vacuum control in general... My understanding is that the Chevy ecotec turbo engines are vacuum controlled somehow. I learned this at a Chevy dealership, looking over a running and partially disassembled 2012 Chevy Sonic 1.4L turbo that I was considering buying and that had just thrown a code for the vacuum system.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2018, 10:47 PM   #9 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,548
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,622 Times in 1,447 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
On the point of vacuum control in general... My understanding is that the Chevy ecotec turbo engines are vacuum controlled somehow. I learned this at a Chevy dealership, looking over a running and partially disassembled 2012 Chevy Sonic 1.4L turbo that I was considering buying and that had just thrown a code for the vacuum system.
Apart from power brakes, I can't remember any other vacuum-dependent feature on the new cars in general.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2018, 10:58 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mpg_numbers_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,363

Toby - '13 Toyota Prius C
90 day: 64.01 mpg (US)

Daz - '15 Mazda 3 iTouring w/ Tech Package
90 day: 38.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 321
Thanked 480 Times in 365 Posts
The lowest speed in the highest gear generally nets the highest FE....what's with trying to complicate things with a vacuum gauge?

__________________
2013 Toyota Prius C 2 (my car)


2015 Mazda 3 iTouring Hatchback w/ Tech Package (wife's car)
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com