Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2009, 09:45 AM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sheffield UK
Posts: 50
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry to bump up an older thread.
But ( cant remmember which team ) there was a motorcycle racing team that decided to install the exhaust under the seat - and it gave trememdous advantages.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 02:33 PM   #12 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Sure, things are a bit different when you're going 180 mph and seeking tenth-of-a-second advantages.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2009, 02:12 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
BamZipPow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 678

BZP T-100 (2010) - '98 T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
90 day: 20.99 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2011) - '98 T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
90 day: 20.93 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2009) - '98 T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 19.01 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (current) (2012) - '98 T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
90 day: 19.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 229
Thanked 152 Times in 117 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to BamZipPow Send a message via AIM to BamZipPow Send a message via MSN to BamZipPow Send a message via Yahoo to BamZipPow
I bet that kinda heated up their rear end a little bit...kinda like putting the fire to their butt.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 01:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,975
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 807 Times in 469 Posts
slipstream

Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
Right now my exhaust exits right below the bumper on the drivers side. I could get it to route just above the bumper with a slight bend just in front of the muffler and a 6 inch extension. The exit would be right in the slipstream then and hence in a slight vacuum.

I would have to cut the body work which makes me uneasy with this mod.

Edit: CO poisoning isn't a problem on diesels unless they are way out of tune. Fumes wouldn't getting into the passenger compartment wouldn't be a problem anyway
The base pressure behind the 300 will essentially be at the same pressure as where the air separates.If the side tailpipe is within 6-inches of the tail,there may be little Delta-P between the two locations.Also,the side flow is dilluting the exhaust stream through mixing,which wouldn't necessarily occur behind the car,making it nastier for following motorists.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 12:53 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 383

1996 geo metro - '96 metro base
Thanks: 1
Thanked 54 Times in 42 Posts
just placing the exhaust tip willy nilly somewhere may put it in an area of pressure or ...
so
it would not be too hard
to measure , just get a MAP or FuelTankPressuresensor sensor from somewhere (junk yard) get the connector too ...
three pins on the MAP or FuelTankPressure sensor.
power 5v , ground , signal .
,tap into the 5volt reference in the car OR make up a 5v power supply , use a dvom or labscope on the MAP or FuelTankPressure sensor sensor signal pin
and position a vacuum line from the MAP or FuelTankPressure sensor in the car
to the area you suspect has lower "pressure " , drive the car .

not moving signal voltage will be about 4.5 volts on a MAP sensor from GM or 3 volts on a Honda MAP sensor , what ever the value
assign it to be "local Ambient Barometric pressure "

for this test ;
lower voltage is better because it will show (lower pressure),
you will be searching for the vacuum hose position that yields the lowest value

there are charts that will give up voltage vs "pressure" values.
depending on which MAP or FuelTankPressuresensor you can scavenge from ...
a FuelTankPressure sensor will have better resolution .(differences will be easier to measure and see)

or use a real pressure transducer .
or a water filled vertical "U" shaped tube with the vacuum line on one end of the "U" permanent marker graduation s ...
either way , differences will not be large
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 08:32 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
The base pressure behind the 300 will essentially be at the same pressure as where the air separates.If the side tailpipe is within 6-inches of the tail,there may be little Delta-P between the two locations.Also,the side flow is dilluting the exhaust stream through mixing,which wouldn't necessarily occur behind the car,making it nastier for following motorists.
I think sending more concentrated exhaust to following cars is reason enough not to do it. It could be a pretty significant difference considering that cars intake air for the HVAC at the cowl... So someone drafting you would get your exhaust in the cabin.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 11:09 PM   #17 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
I usually smell smokers in the cars ahead of me (with all my windows up) before I see them!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proposed braking test: comparing tire pressure @ 50 psi vs 35 brucepick EcoModding Central 55 06-11-2011 08:29 PM
The Mechanism Behind Flow Separation LostCause Aerodynamics 46 07-15-2010 07:38 AM
Discussion on tire efficiency Ernie Rogers General Efficiency Discussion 68 02-21-2010 08:45 PM
Looking for a fuel efficient solution. I've got a few ideas. CuriousOne EcoModding Central 41 03-28-2009 02:46 PM
Valve stem caps that blink when your pressure is low SVOboy EcoModding Central 1 12-23-2007 03:57 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com