Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2011, 12:22 PM   #1 (permalink)
60+ mpg at posted speeds
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 1,190

Black and Green - '98 Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 64.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 384
Thanked 166 Times in 113 Posts
Reversed any mods?

Which mods have you reversed and why?

I am considering reversing my wiper delete because I am not convinced it does much of anything since it is encased in a high pressure bubble at speed. And I am considering reversing my driver side mirror delete to get police to pay me less attention (and because aerohead tested it on his civic in rigorous conditions and found no effect on the vehicle's top speed).


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________


Black and Green will be rebuilt over decades as parts die--until it becomes a different car. Goal is only 60-70 mpg at posted speeds. I'm not trying for highest possible mileage.

Calculators: standard deviation, Ohms Law, & drag HP losses.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 12:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
5 Gears of Fury
 
War_Wagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C., Canada
Posts: 275

Lumpy - '00 Insight
90 day: 49.98 mpg (US)

Grendel - '00 Firefly
90 day: 39.17 mpg (US)

Salty - '91 Tercel DX
90 day: 35.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 54
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
I can see putting the mirror back on, if Johnny Law is looking at you funny then it's not worth the grief of getting pulled over. Wiper delete isn't so much of an option up here as we can be subject to rain pretty much any time of year.

I think the only thing I ever reversed was tire PSI. I had been running quite a bit over sidewall pressure for quite some time, everything was fine and I had pretty much forgot they were that high, then the first frosty morning happened and scared me into a parking lot to drop the pressure to something a bit more reasonable for the season.
__________________
"Don't look for one place to lose 100 pounds, look for 1600 places to lose an ounce." - Tony DeFeo
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 12:39 PM   #3 (permalink)
kir_kenix
 
kir_kenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cortland, Ne (25 miles south of Lincoln)
Posts: 87

1997 Chevy s10 - '97 S10 WT
Pickups
90 day: 27.79 mpg (US)

1997 Ford Escort - '97 Escort LX
Team Ford
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
There has to be a point of where balancing drivablilty/functionability meet FE. Removing weight (wiper/mirror) and the aero penelty of these had to have SOME (albiet probably very small) impact on your FE.

I'm in the same boat: I know that removing mirrors, wipers, antanea etc will improve FE, but I don't think the returns justify the lack of visability or radio. Others feel differently and are perfectly OK with their choices.


I say do whatever makes you feel safer and/or make your vehicle more functionable for you. Like I said, its worth it to me to pay that extra .1mpg to be able to use my passenger side mirror, see out my whole window when it rains, and listen to tunes while I drive.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 12:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
MPG>HP
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 479

Little Blue - '09 Focus SE
Team Ford
90 day: 34.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
I've reduced tire PSI to what Ford recommends during winter.
__________________
Best Tank:36.915MPG|422.6Miles
Longest Tank:35.2MPG|435.8Miles
Best Trip:45.9MPG|5.9Miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 04:45 PM   #5 (permalink)
60+ mpg at posted speeds
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 1,190

Black and Green - '98 Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 64.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 384
Thanked 166 Times in 113 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kir_kenix View Post
There has to be a point of where balancing drivablilty/functionability meet FE. Removing weight (wiper/mirror) and the aero penelty of these had to have SOME (albiet probably very small) impact on your FE.
That is what I would think too. But at least for the mirrors aerohead reported here that his 4th Gen Civic (4th?) was tested for top speed, mirrors on and off. The testers could measure, I think he wrote, to the 1/1000 of an MPH and found no difference. I wonder if that goes for my mirror too, but I'll take the bet that Honda kept its gains for my 6th Gen Civic. As for other cars... well... I know even less surely.
__________________


Black and Green will be rebuilt over decades as parts die--until it becomes a different car. Goal is only 60-70 mpg at posted speeds. I'm not trying for highest possible mileage.

Calculators: standard deviation, Ohms Law, & drag HP losses.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 05:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
I had a Tempo fully kitted with skirts, cowl panel, wiper delete, mirror delete, antenna delete, hood blanket, grille block, etc. Now the skirts and cowl panel are gone and the mirrors are back; the blanket and block remain too. Can't say the fe differences are detectable in my case. I kept the antenna off because I usually don't have the radio on anyway. I keep the wipers in the car because they are rarely used and by keeping them inside I don't have to constantly replace wipers that have been little used or even unused.

I did encounter a situation with my F150's fan delete the other day- it was 95 degrees and I had the a/c on and I was in town waiting for the world's longest red light to change. The a/c started blowing warm and I initially thought it was busted due to lack of use, so I switched to open windows and vents. But after considering it a bit I decided that it quit simply because of the lack of airflow over the condensor and sure enough, when I tried it a few days later it worked perfectly. So I will either add an electric fan, or since the situation is so rare for me, just be aware that this might happen and act accordingly.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 06:54 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
low&slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Livermore CA
Posts: 226

l&s' Jag - '00 S-Type SE
90 day: 26.32 mpg (US)

l&s' Vision - '82 Vision XZ550RJ
90 day: 63.28 mpg (US)

L&S' Ninja 250 - '99 Ninja EX250F Ninja 250R
90 day: 86.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 66 Times in 38 Posts
I Have also reversed a R mirror delete and an exterior grille blocks. The lack of a R side mirror made backing into a single car garage more difficult and the benefit was very small. I replaced the exterior grille blocking with a " stealth " upper grille block and a front air dam. I still plan on doing some under body panels. I got tired of the harassment I received from others on how I was ruining my beautiful car so I none focus on efficient driving, higher tire pressures and less noticeble aero body mods.
Now I put most of ecomodding energy in streamling my motorcycle .

all the best L&S
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 07:12 PM   #8 (permalink)
Ohh snap
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 848

Lesbaru - '00 Outback
90 day: 21.98 mpg (US)

Convertalier - '00 Cavalier Z24 Convertible
90 day: 26.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 44
Thanked 87 Times in 46 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
I have reversed rear wheel skirts (too much work to access the rear wheels compared to cost savings)

Along with the camera mirror, mainly because the thing broke on me after only 5000 miles. Which was only half way to my break even mileage.

Other than that, all mods are still on.
__________________

Daily Driver
Winter Beast
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 07:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
I are aerodynamic kitteh!
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 625

2000 Fiat Dakota Quad Cab - '00 Dakota Quad Cab SLT
90 day: 18.33 mpg (US)

Dakota A-B-A HAI - '00 Dakota Quad Cab SLT
90 day: 19.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 219
Thanked 150 Times in 86 Posts
I removed my upper grille block after determining that it did nothing for my FE, and it caused my engine coolant temperature to remain much closer to the electric fan setpoint than without the block in place.
__________________

2000 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab
2002 Chrysler Sebring Convertible GTC with transplanted 3.5L LH engine
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 12:02 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7

Tractor - '93 Pickup W250 Extended cab Power Ram
90 day: 22.38 mpg (US)

minivan - '03 Town and Country Lxi
90 day: 25.8 mpg (US)

HCHII - '08 Civic
90 day: 49.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I made a temporary grill block with duct tape over the upper grill on my Town and Country. Removed it for an A-B-A test and found mileage stayed at 23.9 before during and after the grill block. Didn't effect my coolant or trans temp with or without a/c running, though.
Determined it wasn't worth it to make a permanent one in this situation.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com