Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-15-2008, 10:55 PM   #1 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
Review: 2008 Chevy Malibu LT (31.3 MPG)

“Real World Test: 2008 Chevy Malibu LT”

(No hypermiling is performed on newly tested models: average driving is done to see what the average driver can expect. Max sidewall tire pressures were applied in this test)

+ Best Domestic Midsize FE
+ Comfortable Ride for all Passengers
+ Easy, yet Fun to Drive

- Keeps Getting Bigger Every Re-design (how many more times do I have to write this)?
- Low Quality of Interior Parts / Assembly
- Low Resale due to Fleet Sales

Introduction: If you’re familiar with my reviews, you know that I absolutely love the previous generation Malibu. Review Link. Its simplicity, ergonomics, and FE has earned it several accolades on my part. The new model has some big shoes to fill.

Made alongside the Saturn Aura at the Fairfax Assembly Plant in Kansas City, Kansas, the new Malibu is very similar in dimensions and appearance. The advantage to the Malibu is the available Eco-Tec 4-Cylinder. This all new redesign impacted the Press with its striking exterior, driveability and character (not to mention its larger size).

“2008 North American Car of the Year” by vote. “Car of the Year” boasts Motor Trend Magazine. “Ten Best” says Car and Driver . Others rave of its design; however, I was still apprehensive to drive it. Having driven its twin, the Saturn Aura, my impressions were that it wasn’t a good family representative. Heavy steering, poor V-6 FE, and vague driving feel turned me off to that model’s appeal. So, I stuck with the previous generation Malibu as my tried-and-true companion of 1000’s of efficient miles. Moreover, the new Malibu looks bigger and less efficient than before. The time had come to choose a pinch hitter for a family trip. It turns out that this player just might be from the Major Leagues...

The first trip included a family weekender from Kansas City to the Minneapolis Area / Central Minnesota, and back. Four adults and luggage cruised at 70-75 with ease and efficiency. The second portion was for business: KC – Sioux City, IA and back – with just yours truly.

Note: The 2008 “Malibu Classic”, or last year’s model, can be bought by fleets and the like. These will trickle into the mainstream as they enter the auction block. There is little to identify them, since GM decided not to call it the “Classic” like they did last time.

On the Outside: “It’s the car you can’t ignore”, advertises GM. 2 model generations ago, I would have liked to ignore the Malibu by sinking it to the bottom of the Missouri River. Since that horrible lump of a conveyance, each redesign has vastly improved the outward quality of the drivetrain, driving feel, interior and exterior. The new model is vastly different, with a large frontal aspect, sweeping lines, and chopped rear deck. It has a European air about it, with side-marker turn signals and aggressive dual-grille.



Those are actually 5-spoke, 17” steel wheels with plastic wheel covers made to look like chrome. It will fool the average passerby, and give it a more expensive appearance. The taillights match the car’s aggressive demeanor and add to the visual experience.



The 4-cylinder is also available in the upline LTZ model, with satellite radio, heated seats, leather, and other goodies.

On the Inside: The interior is yet another improvement over the last model. The instrument cluster and accent lighting give it an upscale feel. The audio system offered a standard auxiliary input jack and good tone. Interior sound levels were low. There were some things that did not exude quality, however.

As mentioned, the trip included a trip with the the In-Laws to Minneapolis. While loading up at the hotel, one of the rear doors wouldn’t close – something was stuck! In the meantime, a cab driver began honking with impatience. “Hold on a second!” I shouted.

The plastic kickplate trim had come loose and became stuck in the door. I opened the door fully (more honking) and quickly snapped it back into place, but not without getting into a face-to-face argument with the Cabbie. All was resolved after the exchange of “pleasantries”, and we were on our way. Other trim pieces seemed loose or poorly fitted. On my way to Sioux City, an annoying rattle developed in the driver’s door. A few swift wallops took care of it.



Side Note: “I must explain, that it’s not my usual demeanor to get into a shouting match with other drivers (anymore). The hotel was downtown, near the I-35W bridge collapse site. Traffic was mayhem and construction detours seemed to raise the blood pressure of other drivers in the area, including me. The Interstate basically dumped itself into the streets of downtown. One has to stand back and reflect at the number of bridges we take for granted on a daily basis. In this case, it took a major catastrophe to open the eyes of the public. Luckily, the city had several other options to cross the Mississippi, but without GPS, I still would’ve been circling the Metrodome”.

Otherwise, steering-wheel buttons, ergonomically placed controls, and overall comfort and convenience trumped the stumbles in build quality. The dash is swept with more style, yet simple plastic panels are run-of-the-mill. The instrument cluster matches the nighttime “mood lighting” with a pleasant blue-green hue.



The information center cycles Avg. FE, Instant FE, Dual Tripometers, Ambient Temp, Average Speed, Distance to Empty, and other info such as Cruise Control updates. All are accessed within easy reach, on steering wheel.



The trunk is sizable, and stowed a 4-person luggage set with ease. Rear seat passengers are offered a dual cupholder, and plenty of room. The extended length of this model refresh allows for more legroom. Again, all passengers acclaimed that the comfort was a definite improvement over the last model.



I have to summarize that the front seats were also very supportive and comfortable – no complaints. With Mother’s Day brunch sitting heavy and the satisfaction of a Red Sox win the night before, the 3 passengers soon drifted to sleep in the quiet abode. And yes, the center armrest is adjustable by sliding forward for elbow comfort (but the door’s rest is solid plastic). A Tilt/Telescoping wheel is standard. This car just might compete in the highly competitive mid-sized family sedan segment.

Safety: To put it bluntly, safety comes standard. The Malibu received 5-Star NHTSA Driver and Passenger impact ratings. Side-curtain airbags are standard on all models, with the driver’s bag deployed based on the weight of the driver. 4-wheel ABS is also standard, as is traction and stability controls.

Efficiency: This engine and transmission combo is a great pair. GM has taken cues from the obvious by making the final gearing taller. With a final drive ratio of 3.29, this rivals the 3.05 or 3.63 of past Inline-4’s. RPMs at 60 MPH are approximately 2100, with 70 MPH coming in at 2500. This is traditional GM V-6 territory. Honestly, the 4-banger handled this range excellently. An odd trend during cruise: the torque converter would constantly unlock and lock slightly – in a rhythmic motion. While just cruising along, any reduction in load or throttle would cause the tach to bump up 200 RPM and back down into full lockup. It wasn’t noticeable or felt – just something noticed at the tach. I predict this to be a wear-out point in the future, but may be the secret to the low-RPM drivability of this engine.



A mild-hybrid model is also available, with a slight bump in EPA ratings.

The Drive: Based on GM’s Epsilon platform, the Malibu shares underpinnings with the popularly selling, European Opel/Vauxhall Vectra. For the U.S., Chevy made sure the drive would be “just right”. Electric power steering in the 4-cylinder is easy to operate, yet offers little feedback. This is just fine, since it likely saves on fuel. The ride is perfectly balanced whether loaded or with a lone driver. Cornering is precise and the ride is mid-range (not too harsh or soft). The engine is rev-happy and very efficient. Shifts are firm and deliberate from the 4-speed automatic – that is, until the torque converter slides into lock and back again (and lock again, and back…)

The upline V-6 models come standard with a 6-speed automatic. The top-level LTZ model offers the 6-speed in 4-cylinder trim. This is a curious addition. Hopefully, the FE will benefit. This particular 6-speed was tested in the Saturn Aura and Vue over the last year. Around town, this transmission was indecisive and hesitant to downshift and seemed rather confused as to what to do. The Vue was equipped with the “Manu-Matic” shift gate, so to save on confusion, I did the shifting myself. On the highway, the final gearing proved beneficial, but balked on slight grades. We shall see.

For the Energy Conscious: Surprisingly, GM has come-up with an FE winner in an overall appealing package. This large, mid-size sedan, hits decent FE numbers through common sense techniques. Drive and ride is not compromised, and the looks don’t scream “Rental Car!” If you are after a Domestic, Mid-Sized Family Sedan, look no further. If FE is a priority, Imports such as the Accord, Camry, or Sonata manual-transmission models can offer better economy at a higher price tag.

Loaded up, the average was 28-30 MPG. Single passenger averaged 34-36 MPG.

As always, consider the size of your vehicle needs, and think smaller.

Raw Data -- Specs:
Model: 2008 Chevy Malibu
Trim: 1LT
Class Size: Mid-Size Sedan
Transmission: 4-speed automatic with lock-up torque converter
Engine: 2.4L DOHC, 16-Valve, I-4 with Variable Valve Timing
Rating: 169 hp at 6400 RPM and (EDIT) 162 lb-ft torque at 4500
Drivetrain: FWD
Seating Capacity: 5 (very snug) at 2+3 or 4 more comfortably at 2+2
RPM @ 60 MPH: 2100
Price as Tested: $22,500 USD (May, 2008)
ECU Target Coolant Temp: 190F
Curb Weight: 3436 lbs.
EPA: 22/30
EPA Average Fuel Cost per Year: $1842

Raw Data -- Stats:
EcoModder Tested Mileage: 31.3 MPG
Speed Avg: 60 MPH
Time of Operation: Lots
Distance Driven: 1791 Miles
Gallons Used: 57.26
Ambient Outside Temp: 50-80F
Cruise Speed: 70-75 MPH
Test Loop: Kansas City – Minneapolis and Central Minnesota – KC – Sioux City, IA – KC
A/C Usage: 5-10% of time
Wind/Weather: Over 4 days: 50-80F Max Tailwind = 25 gusting to 40 MPH, Max Headwind = 20; 20% Rain, 80% Clear
Driving Style: Average, with max sidewall tire pressure applied

RH77

__________________
If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research ― Albert Einstein

_
_

Last edited by RH77; 05-16-2008 at 11:40 AM.. Reason: spelling/grammar, Torque Figure
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 09:38 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 7,416

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 57.27 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 55.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 381
Thanked 861 Times in 564 Posts
Good review.

Now to wait on the reliability reviews...
__________________
Current project: 2002 Honda Civic LX repair & modding
Currently driving: 1997 Sunfire 4 spd auto build thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 11:26 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
bhazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wauseon, OH (Toledo)
Posts: 412

The TC - '88 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe
90 day: 28.03 mpg (US)

2012 Golf TDI - '12 Volkswagen Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 45.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
3436 lbs.... in a n/a 4 cylinder with only 128lb-ft of torque. That thing has to be a dog.
__________________
BP+T/G5MR swapped '93 Festiva
Escort GT Block, Garrett T3 45trim, A/R .42/.48
SRT-4 Intercooler
---Bests with BP+T---
1/4 mile ET - 12.50
1/4 mile MPH - 111.5
Best MPG - 36.8
Average MPG - 31.6 (over 14,300 miles)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 11:40 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 303

Pushrod - '02 Chevrolet Cavalier
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Good review.

Now to wait on the reliability reviews...
You don't have to wait. The 2.4L Ecotec has been around for a few years now.

Quote:
3436 lbs.... in a n/a 4 cylinder with only 128lb-ft of torque. That thing has to be a dog.
I wouldn't worry too much about torque. You've got 169 horsepower available when you want it. It's an interesting contrast between GM's comparable old-school engines. Even my 2.2L 2200 at 115HP sports 135lb/ft torque, and the 2.4L Z24 motor puts down 155lb/ft torque, but only 150hp. Hey, if you want a fast sedan, get the V6. I'm not going to complain, I think we could use some more "dogs".
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 11:44 AM   #5 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 7,416

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 57.27 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 55.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 381
Thanked 861 Times in 564 Posts
I'm not overly concerned with the engine. It everything else.

We definitly could use more dogs.
__________________
Current project: 2002 Honda Civic LX repair & modding
Currently driving: 1997 Sunfire 4 spd auto build thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 11:47 AM   #6 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhazard View Post
3436 lbs.... in a n/a 4 cylinder with only 128lb-ft of torque. That thing has to be a dog.
That was an error on my part -- it's 162 lb-ft. I used the Corolla review as a template and missed the torque number fill-in.

Even with 162, it doesn't drive like the 2.2L in the former generation. The taller gearing doesn't allow kickdown as often as expected for swift merges, etc. With the variable valve timing, there's a strong 2000-3000 RPM range, which is where the highway cruise takes place. Beyond that, it gets a bit wheezy in the 3000-4000 area, and pulls a bit better from peak hp at 4600 to the 6500 RPM shiftpoint.

It's still sufficient, but not earth-shattering. 0-60 is in 10-seconds, which can be considered "slow" my most of the public. The V-6, of course, is much quicker. In the Aura, it was pretty brisk.

RH77
__________________
If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 11:53 AM   #7 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
We definitly could use more dogs.
Definitely in agreement.

With 4 adults and luggage, it took some effort for highway on-ramps -- but otherwise, it wasn't like it was "Dangerously Slow". It could have had 20 fewer horses and it would've been fine.

Driving around town, the low-end power was great. No complaints.

I do think that GM's reliability is improving (not the best, but getting better). I've driven some beat-up previous generation Malibus at the end of their rental life (usually 30K miles) and they drove fine. Consider than scenario an "accelerated aging process". It seems like the interior bits tend to break or wear first. I see 2005's around town that look pretty good outwardly.

As always, we shall see...

RH77
__________________
If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 01:00 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
adam728's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 69

97 LeSabre - '97 Buick LeSabre Limited
90 day: 26.95 mpg (US)

Mazda3 - '08 Mazda 3 S
90 day: 30.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Good write up.

I currently drive a 2005 Malibu with the 6 cylinder. Plenty of power, and decent mileage too. Unfortunately all my mpg tracking has been just writing it down on reciepts and never really organizing it all, but my lows are in the 28 mpg range, high is over 34 mpg, and "normal" is 32ish. Was handed to me with ~50,000 miles on it when I got my new position, now is on the edge of 100,000 miles. I know I haven't been the nicest too the car, and I think the previous driver didn't care much either, at least judging by the amount of dog hair, coffee stains, and junk that was in it when I recieved it. I don't really beat on it, but I also don't treat it the same as if I owned it (quick lube oil changes, going over on oil changes, not bothering to slow for speed bumps, etc).

Problems
Radio buttons wearing down, clearish white under the black surface
Transmission shift solenoid went out, was stuck in 3rd gear. Cost nearly $1700 to repair because the transmission had to come out of the car and get disassembled to get to the stupid solenoid.

Otherwise a pretty decent car. I've rented the Malibu Maxx before and prefer the rear hatch style over the sedan, mostly because I sometimes am throwing a bicycle or tool box or motorcycle parts in the back, and a hatch is just handier. Can't compare mileage, as the Maxx was a rental, and well, was driven accordingly (rural dirt roads, rally style, maye 16-17 mpg, sorry RH77!)
__________________




Miles displaced by bike in 2008 - approx 68
Miles added to vehicle by driving to rides with buddies - way more than above
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 02:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
Welcome to the site! I loved the Maxx hatchback for family trips. It really hauled extra cargo with ease. Not as good on the mileage, though.

I'll always like the 2004-2008(fleet) Malibu Sedan (especially the ones with XM Radio). I don't know how many 1000's of miles were covered over the years with different ones, but I knew in either the V-6 or 4, I could count on good mileage.

Too bad about the transmission. I had transmission problems with a Chevy a while back too.

Speaking of Rally-Style, do you follow the sport? I work the 100-Acre Wood Rally America National Championship Series in Missouri (for the last 3 years). Talk about a blast! I usually end up with a mid-size SUV as the Stage Medic -- but fun can still be had

Feel free to introduce yourself in the Intro forum, and again welcome!

RH77

Quote:
Originally Posted by adam728 View Post
Good write up.

I currently drive a 2005 Malibu with the 6 cylinder. Plenty of power, and decent mileage too. Unfortunately all my mpg tracking has been just writing it down on reciepts and never really organizing it all, but my lows are in the 28 mpg range, high is over 34 mpg, and "normal" is 32ish. Was handed to me with ~50,000 miles on it when I got my new position, now is on the edge of 100,000 miles. I know I haven't been the nicest too the car, and I think the previous driver didn't care much either, at least judging by the amount of dog hair, coffee stains, and junk that was in it when I recieved it. I don't really beat on it, but I also don't treat it the same as if I owned it (quick lube oil changes, going over on oil changes, not bothering to slow for speed bumps, etc).

Problems
Radio buttons wearing down, clearish white under the black surface
Transmission shift solenoid went out, was stuck in 3rd gear. Cost nearly $1700 to repair because the transmission had to come out of the car and get disassembled to get to the stupid solenoid.

Otherwise a pretty decent car. I've rented the Malibu Maxx before and prefer the rear hatch style over the sedan, mostly because I sometimes am throwing a bicycle or tool box or motorcycle parts in the back, and a hatch is just handier. Can't compare mileage, as the Maxx was a rental, and well, was driven accordingly (rural dirt roads, rally style, maye 16-17 mpg, sorry RH77!)
__________________
If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 04:30 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
adam728's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 69

97 LeSabre - '97 Buick LeSabre Limited
90 day: 26.95 mpg (US)

Mazda3 - '08 Mazda 3 S
90 day: 30.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RH77 View Post
Speaking of Rally-Style, do you follow the sport? I work the 100-Acre Wood Rally America National Championship Series in Missouri (for the last 3 years). Talk about a blast! I usually end up with a mid-size SUV as the Stage Medic -- but fun can still be had

Feel free to introduce yourself in the Intro forum, and again welcome!

RH77
I don't follow it too much, but up until about 1 year and a half ago I lived in Michigan and always tried to make it to the Lake Superior Pro Rally in the upper penninsula and the Sno Drift rally in the norther lower penninsula. Have gotten to meet Ken Block and Travis Pastrana a couple of times. Rally always looks like fun, but the few guys I know that do it as a hobby always seem to be broke. Getting the cars up to spec for safety costs a good bit, and entry fees are rediculas! I'll stick to hare scramble racing!

I'll put together an intro here. Been lurking a while, today I am half working, half screwing around.

__________________




Miles displaced by bike in 2008 - approx 68
Miles added to vehicle by driving to rides with buddies - way more than above
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2004-2008 Chevy Malibu (Review) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 11 07-16-2014 04:04 PM
Review: 2008 Nissan Altima 2.5 S, CVT RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 10 03-09-2010 02:40 AM
Review: 2009 Toyota Corolla LE (37.9 MPG) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 22 05-09-2008 04:55 PM
Autoblog Prius review: more evidence of the power of MPG instrumentation MetroMPG Instrumentation 6 01-02-2008 11:48 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com