Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-21-2010, 10:23 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kc KS
Posts: 119

Dart Lite - '76 Dart Dart Lite
90 day: 18.34 mpg (US)

The Teal Truck - '97 Ram 1500 Club Cab / Short Bed / 2wd
90 day: 14.74 mpg (US)

The H Bomb - '93 Accord LX
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Scan Gauge II question

I got my Scan Gauge II on Saturday! Thanks for the great price Ecomodder!

My question is this: periodically, the instant MPG setting will go to 9999 and take several seconds to return back to a realistic MPG number. Is this a normal activity?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
1976 Dart Lite /6 with 3 speed manual
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2010, 10:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foothills near Denver
Posts: 277

RSX2fast4mpg - '02 RSX Type S
90 day: 37.22 mpg (US)

bubbatrucker - '98 K1500
90 day: 18.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
That's where you want it. That means that you aren't using any fuel. You'll find that it happens when you're decelerating with the RPMs starting over 2000. Your car is going into Deceleration Fuel Cut Off (DFCO). Here in Colorado, it's not unusual for me to hold my car back on extended descents for miles in DFCO, but it's normal in day to day traffic, too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2010, 08:52 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kc KS
Posts: 119

Dart Lite - '76 Dart Dart Lite
90 day: 18.34 mpg (US)

The Teal Truck - '97 Ram 1500 Club Cab / Short Bed / 2wd
90 day: 14.74 mpg (US)

The H Bomb - '93 Accord LX
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Cool.
2nd question...

Truck is 97 Ram. Truck was originally a 5.2, but it died. I bought what was supposed to be another 5.2, ended up as 5.9/360cu in.

Nothing else was changed. Same injectors, computer, etc.

Would I load the Scan Guage as 5.2 or 5.9?
__________________
1976 Dart Lite /6 with 3 speed manual
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2010, 12:08 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foothills near Denver
Posts: 277

RSX2fast4mpg - '02 RSX Type S
90 day: 37.22 mpg (US)

bubbatrucker - '98 K1500
90 day: 18.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
5.9, but realize this is going to give you estimated mpg, not super accurate data until you calibrate it with your second fill up.

The first fill up, go to menu, fill up, and save without adjusting the gallons filled. That let's the SG know you filled. The next tank do adjust the gallons used and save it and your data will be much more accurate in the future.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2010, 09:05 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kc KS
Posts: 119

Dart Lite - '76 Dart Dart Lite
90 day: 18.34 mpg (US)

The Teal Truck - '97 Ram 1500 Club Cab / Short Bed / 2wd
90 day: 14.74 mpg (US)

The H Bomb - '93 Accord LX
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Even though the computer and injectors think it is the 5.2? How does the ScanGauge come up with the MPG numbers in the first place? I presume it is injector duty cycle related, but if the truck thinks it has a 5.2, would the SG not also need to match, even though it had a larger engine?
__________________
1976 Dart Lite /6 with 3 speed manual
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2010, 09:24 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foothills near Denver
Posts: 277

RSX2fast4mpg - '02 RSX Type S
90 day: 37.22 mpg (US)

bubbatrucker - '98 K1500
90 day: 18.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
I'm not certain but it won't matter after you calibrate it. Either way, this first tank is just a guess for the device anyway. I didn't even bother to set my engine size initially and defaulted to 3.0L. That made me drive even more conservatively than I would have, looking at sub-30 mpg numbers all the time. Now, properly set up and calibrated, I get light footed when I'm under 40.

In any case, it all works the same. Now you have a number to watch besides the speedo and that alone changes the way you drive. Instead of the single most important thing being when you arrive, it becomes mpg. Just that simple change in motivation usually equals 20% or better.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Tags
mpg, scan gauge

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com