Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Instrumentation
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-06-2010, 06:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
scangauge fuel tank size accuracy

Right. I have a scangauage 2 on my car which has a 9.6 gallon tank.

As the scangauge doesnt have high accuracy on fuel tank size measuremeant I have told it that its 10gallons as per the manual which says round up.

My Question is, does it affect the accuracy as , after a 10 or 20 fillups I have adjusted it to the point where my Miles to empty is now accurate.

Whereas before it used to say emtpy 30 miles before it was actually empty. it now correlates when its actually emtpy.

?
confused


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 06:52 PM   #2 (permalink)
epic stock master
 
luvit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: US
Posts: 377

86 Accord LX (carb) - '86 Accord LX
90 day: 35.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
i can't answer your question, but no matter what model of car i own, this makes me scratch my head:

when i'm on empty, i almost always pump 2 more gallons than the tank's rated size. -- i don't top off.

makes me mad or something.
__________________
.
single person car thread
.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 06:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2 gallons! thats a lot!

When its really really emtpy I sometimes put in 2-3 liters more than the tank size which I attribute to the fuel pipe between the tank and the nozzle and between the engine and the tank.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 07:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
epic stock master
 
luvit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: US
Posts: 377

86 Accord LX (carb) - '86 Accord LX
90 day: 35.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
.
i do this a lot.
.
__________________
.
single person car thread
.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 07:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
heh same.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 07:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
Ecomodder en route
 
KITT222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South of the Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 190

Vib - '04 Vibe base
Thanks: 10
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Automakers alter the gas gauge in your car so even when its on E the car has a gallon or so left. I was driving my dads fiances Corolla the other day, and it was on E. I mentioned it, and she said the car has a few gallons left. In fact when I got off the side roads, and onto the highway the needle went up.

In your case I'd say to round it down to 9 gallons. That means range wont be accurate, but it wont be an overshot. I dont own a Scangauge, so I dont know if theres a .5 gallons, or not, but if there is, than go with 9.5 gallons.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 07:27 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So essentially the mile to empty and rage is more accurate now with the tank size on 10 gallons?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 07:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,501

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
90 day: 42.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 340
Thanked 418 Times in 286 Posts
alexander.foti -

Since you are in the UK, I am assuming Imperial Gallons. Here's a trick that I haven't tried :

1 - 9.6 Imperial Gallons = 11.529 US Gallons = 43.642 liters (used this converter)

Code:
 9.6   => 10 /  9.6   = 1.0416 => +4.2% tank size error
43.642 => 44 / 43.642 = 1.008  => +0.8% tank size error
2 - Switch to liter units. Enter tank size of 44. Switch back to gallons. You may see 9 or 10 gallons, I don't know. Switch back to liter to verify that the liter value of 44 stayed in the scangauge. If it does, then you should have a more accurate tank size.

I haven't tried this, but it's an easy test.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cfg83 For This Useful Post:
mcrews (01-07-2010), MetroMPG (01-07-2010)
Old 01-06-2010, 08:24 PM   #9 (permalink)
ECO-Evolution
 
Lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,476

Iron Horse - '97 Intrepid

C-3 - '08 XF50X
90 day: 135.32 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexander.foti View Post
Right. I have a scangauage 2 on my car which has a 9.6 gallon tank.

As the scangauge doesnt have high accuracy on fuel tank size measuremeant I have told it that its 10gallons as per the manual which says round up.

My Question is, does it affect the accuracy as , after a 10 or 20 fillups I have adjusted it to the point where my Miles to empty is now accurate.

Whereas before it used to say emtpy 30 miles before it was actually empty. it now correlates when its actually emtpy.

?
confused
Not sure I understand the question but when you fill up the amount you put in the tank should match the amount of fuel used on the SG. Mine was accurate to within .1 gallon almost every fillup once I got it adjusted.
__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 09:16 PM   #10 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,037

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.85 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 28.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 266 Times in 204 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexander.foti View Post
As the scangauge doesnt have high accuracy on fuel tank size measuremeant I have told it that its 10 gallons as per the manual which says round up.
...uh, which SGII instructions are you reading and following (Ver 4.5, 5.0 or 5.1)?

...early versions mentioned comparing "percent" value, while the newest (ver 5.1) "Quick Setup" mentions comparing "gallons" fuel used.

...I'm sure the "gallons" method described in the "Quick Setup" pamphlet is the most accurate method.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SIDI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970˝ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to calculate MPG / fuel economy formula MetroMPG DIY / How-to 21 06-29-2010 10:37 AM
Engine braking without using fuel idea Dane-ger EcoModding Central 38 02-04-2010 11:35 AM
Effect of fuel octane number on FE hummingbird EcoModding Central 32 10-28-2009 01:50 AM
87 octane vs 89 octane kill-9 General Efficiency Discussion 42 08-15-2009 06:12 PM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 12:38 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com