Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Instrumentation
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2015, 04:02 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: South Bay Area, CA
Posts: 8
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
ScanGauge II - MPG Questions

I've frequented this forum off and on for quite some time, and I finally made the time to register moments ago. I have several questions that I hope is ok to ask in this one thread / discussion. If not, I can make separate threads, but they are related...

My vehicle, in case it matters, and if it doesn't show-up in my sig:

2003 MINI Cooper S

1. If one were to change the fuel injectors to larger ones, would that impact how the SG2 computes MPG, and if so how (up or down)? Not knowing how this figure is computed, I have no idea...

2. During set-up the user is prompted to input the displacement of the engine. Does it matter if the engine has forced induction (turbo or supercharged)? Since the instructions don't note such, I guess not, but I ask because many often speak of the effective displacement of boosted engines (at a specific PSI)...

3. Prior to purchasing the SG2 I was led to believe that during set-up it asks for the vehicle's weight. I was not prompted for that information so I guess I was misinformed, or I confused this with another device. So, vehicle weight is not a needed input for the SG2, correct?

4. Setting of the fuel cutoff. Many threads here and on the web... When off the throttle, coasting, in gear, I get the expected "9999", with the default of 24. I had read that the cutoff is best with a setting at 1-4 above TPS, in neutral. The instructions say 4, but others had said 1... With the engine idling, car parked, I see a TPS of 7. A poster had said to get this TPS number with the engine not running, but with the ignition in the 2nd position. My SG2 does not turn-on in this position though. When I turn the engine off though, the SG2 remains on for a bit, and TPS at that point is 2 or 3. Should the SG2 be activated, or have a visible display with the ignition in the number two position (engine off), and is this the ideal or best way to get the TPS number?

5. I am not using the Trip features, but I am using the Gauges, notably MPG and AVG. Since I'm not making use of the Trip functionality, keeping track of the price paid per gallon, is performing the dual fill-up procedure beneficial for more accurate real-time MPG and AVG figures on the gauges?

Thanks much for your assistance.

__________________
2003 MINI Cooper S
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-12-2015, 07:23 AM   #2 (permalink)
Lean Burn Cruiser!
 
BabyDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 931

Big Blazin' - '88 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
SUV
90 day: 14.97 mpg (US)

Chili - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
House of Tudor
Team Streamliner
90 day: 72.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 835
Thanked 490 Times in 309 Posts
Welcome to Ecomodder, TonyB!

I'll attempt to answer your questions to the best of my abilities. Others will chime in and correct me if I am wrong

1. This will not affect the readouts. The SG uses complex algorithms to determine your fuel economy, along with reading from the MAF, MAP, O2 sensor, TPS and others.

2. I see what you are getting at. But, the SG calls for the exact engine size, so if you have a 2.0, then input a 2.0. It can read Boost Pressure and different MAP/MAF readings, so it will be on top of things

3. The best I can remember, vehicle weight is not needed for the SG.

4. The SG calls for 3-4 over your idle tps. You would want to register this reading as 10 or 11. When you are coasting in Neutral, your engine is idling, right? So that is the measurement you want to go from. Unless you are Engine Off Coasting (EOC), then that value has no meaning

5. Yes. This procedure is to get the SG accuracy dialed in. It will be ballpark at best without calibration. It is still useful, but if you are like me, you want real time data. Doing the calibration will provide that!

Don't hesitate to ask anymore question, Tony. We love helping out around here
__________________



Remember, thank a fellow EM'er for a helpful post!!!
I hypermile better in my cowboy boots

Past threads:
ZX2 modding thread
Ecomodder's Top 10: How they do it!
ZX2 Aerodynamics: Shooting for 0.15 Cd
ZX2 coast-down testing for Cd & Crr
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BabyDiesel For This Useful Post:
TonyB (06-13-2015)
Old 06-12-2015, 09:22 AM   #3 (permalink)
Not bad for a machine
 
dirtydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,024

Maechunbu - Retired - '00 Kia Sephia 1.8I4 16VDOHC
Last 3: 45.28 mpg (US)

Slasher - '96 Chevy Corsica 2.2L 3speedauto
Duct Tape Aero Crew
Team Chevy
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 279
Thanked 242 Times in 179 Posts
it will all even out and correct its self after a few fill ups.

also set it to hybrid if you are coasting engine off or you are turning the car off at redlights.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dirtydave For This Useful Post:
BabyDiesel (06-12-2015), Fat Charlie (06-12-2015), TonyB (06-13-2015)
Old 06-12-2015, 01:06 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: South Bay Area, CA
Posts: 8
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thank you both! Very helpful group here indeed.

1 and 2 - Great to know, and figured that this was being accounted for by the SG2.

3 - I must have been thinking of a different device. I've shed a fair amount of weight on the car...

4 - I appreciate the confirmation on +3 / 4 over idle TPS. But, this brings up an interesting discussion on coasting in neutral, or in gear. After a fair amount of reading, I was left to believe that coasting in gear is not only safer, but actually more fuel efficient, compared to coasting out of gear. Heck, I seem to recall that this (coasting out of gear) is illegal, at least in some states. Curious to hear any thoughts, but the important thing here is this... If one is generally coasting in gear, shouldn't TPS be noted during such, as opposed to just idling while parked? If one coasts out of gear, it would seem to make more sense to get the TPS figure accordingly, like parked in neutral...

5 - Alrighty, I'll start the fill-up procedure. But, dirtydave, are you saying that this procedure is not needed as things sort of correct by itself after a few fill-ups? No coasting with engine off, but that would seem to make sense. If I do decide to do the fill-up procedure, two times, that's it, and won't be necessary with every fill-up?

Happy Friday folks, and thanks again for your generosity!
__________________
2003 MINI Cooper S
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TonyB For This Useful Post:
BabyDiesel (06-12-2015)
Old 06-12-2015, 01:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
"Coasting" in gear is not coasting. That is called engine braking.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to UFO For This Useful Post:
BabyDiesel (06-12-2015)
Old 06-12-2015, 01:50 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: South Bay Area, CA
Posts: 8
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
"Coasting" in gear is not coasting. That is called engine braking.
Thanks UFO. I should have said such, and actually did so in my email to Linear Logic. Interestingly, the rep called that coasting...

One of few links I saved:

Looks like I cannot provide links at this point (need 5+ posts). Here is the content:

"No. Wrong.
All modern electronic fuel injection systems that I am aware of (and that includes a very large percentage of the market here in the US) shut off fuel on deceleration. The reason for this is NOT fuel savings, it is for emissions. Cars nowadays have to meet some very serious emission requirements. Leaving fuel injectors on during deceleration gives no advantage.* They also have a very serious disadvantage in that if you leave the injectors on you then have to deal with unburnt hydrocarbons, and CO.

This is why Bosch K-Jetronic fuel injection went the way of the dodo bird. The K stood for Konstant, this system just pissed fuel into the engine if there was air coming in. Because it sprayed fuel all the time air was flowing into the engine, it was too dirty to meet newer emission requirements.

As far as the details go, typically the system will look at throttle position (duh!) engine temp, and possibly air temp. If the throttle is closed above say 2,000 RPM the ECU stops activating the injectors until a preset RPM is reached, and then they are turned back on. This cut in RPM might be about 1300 RPM warm, and somewhat higher cold, say 1800 RPM. If the driver steps on the gas, the injectors resume right away, regardless of engine speed. This off and on function of the fuel injectors is imperceptible to the driver, but can be demonstrated in a shop using shop tools. I have shown this to my students hundreds of times.

I am not sure of the first system that used fuel cut, but I know Volvo has used it since mid 1982.

Getting back to the OP, assuming your ECU used a fuel cut strategy the difference in fuel usage would be so small I doubt you could measure it. But leaving the car in gear and allowing it to coast would use less fuel on a modern engine. I am not familiar with your model car and engine, so I do not know if uses fuel cut. I suspect it does, but I am not sure.

*The only advantage of leaving the injectors on, is it will keep the engine temp up. If you descend a very long grade, it is possible to have the engine coolant cool off to the point that the heater stops blowing hot air. This complaint shows up during the winter at some car dealers in Denver after cars descend the Eisenhower grade."
++++++

So, if I decide to do my downhill coasting in gear, ie engine braking, is getting TPS out of gear, idling, desired, then adding 3 or 4? As opposed getting a TPS figure while engine braking...

Thanks much.
__________________
2003 MINI Cooper S
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 06:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
Not bad for a machine
 
dirtydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,024

Maechunbu - Retired - '00 Kia Sephia 1.8I4 16VDOHC
Last 3: 45.28 mpg (US)

Slasher - '96 Chevy Corsica 2.2L 3speedauto
Duct Tape Aero Crew
Team Chevy
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 279
Thanked 242 Times in 179 Posts
the scangauge will be close enough after 3-4 fills you can update the price of fuel with everyfill for the tfc and cpm gauges


tps is the way to watch your right foot good for the DWL technique and steady state cruising

shift to neutral unless you are on the throttle. or if you feel unsafe or something
__________________




  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dirtydave For This Useful Post:
TonyB (06-13-2015)
Old 06-12-2015, 06:54 PM   #8 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
I've been using engine-off coasting in my Toyota 4x4 pickup for a while now, as it has no power anything. However, after 2 braking events, the booster runs out and the braking effort gets very heavy. This can be dangerous on long coasts, especially on long downhills. So with the engine off, I just stick it in gear (4th, 1:1) and release the clutch - voila! brake boosting is back. This works great when I have momentum to spare.

And by the way, the Scangauge will not automatically calibrate. Adjust the fuel amount input on each fillup and it should get closer and closer to actual fuel used.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to UFO For This Useful Post:
TonyB (06-13-2015)
Old 06-13-2015, 03:35 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: South Bay Area, CA
Posts: 8
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thank you very much for the follow-up.

I'll do the fill-up procedure when I need gas next, probably late next week. I'm curious how much more accurate it will be... I've noted my averages mutiple times between two homes (getting our old home ready for the mkt), so I'll see what the difference is when more accurate.

I must admit that I'm pleasanty surprised so far, assuming the readings are somewhat accurate. Local driving I'm seeing about 36 to 37 mpg. When I've had some highway mixed in, about 40. Actually today, when I got off the freeway, while at a light idling, I saw the average go from nearly 41 to almost 40 (2 minute wait). Damn. I had no idea idling was that detrimental...

Again, really curious to see if these numbers are true, as compared post fill-up procedure. I have the car's weight down to about 2,290 pounds (1/4 tank of gas). That excludes me, but I'm only about 140 pounds...

Thanks again.
__________________
2003 MINI Cooper S
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2015, 08:49 AM   #10 (permalink)
Lean Burn Cruiser!
 
BabyDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 931

Big Blazin' - '88 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
SUV
90 day: 14.97 mpg (US)

Chili - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
House of Tudor
Team Streamliner
90 day: 72.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 835
Thanked 490 Times in 309 Posts
I speak for everyone here when I say that we avoid idling at all cost. You get 0 mpg when sitting at a stoplight, stop sign, traffic, parking lot, etc. This is where changing routes and timing lights pays big dividends.

The stock weight for your MINI is 2678 lbs. I'm curious to know how you have dropped nearly 400 pounds out of that car.

__________________



Remember, thank a fellow EM'er for a helpful post!!!
I hypermile better in my cowboy boots

Past threads:
ZX2 modding thread
Ecomodder's Top 10: How they do it!
ZX2 Aerodynamics: Shooting for 0.15 Cd
ZX2 coast-down testing for Cd & Crr
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BabyDiesel For This Useful Post:
TonyB (06-13-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com