Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-14-2009, 02:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Shakeup at Aptera?

Hello,

There are rumors and unsubstantiated sources saying that there has been a major shakeup at Aptera -- possibly both Steve Fambro and Chris Anthony are gone, and the company may be down to 20 emplyees (from ~75)!

Start reading from post #76: Is everything ok @ Aptera motors? - Page 8 - ApteraForum.com - Aptera Car Forum

I hope they are untrue -- but it would not be the first time that this sort of thing happened at a start up...

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-15-2009, 06:46 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Sadly, this has been confirmed by at least 3 separate sources. If you read to the end of the thread I linked to above, you can read for yourselves.

A sad day for super-efficient cars. It has all the feel of some sort of suppression effort by the powers that be.

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2009, 07:12 AM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
It has the feel of utter predictability.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2009, 02:12 PM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Let's not forget the "visionary" founding partner of Tesla Motors, Martin Eberhard also found himself in front of the business end of a boot. And the company is doing OK.

At some point the bean counters probably had to seize the reins.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 12:06 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Go Open Source!

Hi,

I wonder if an open source super efficient vehicle would be a better way to go? I've been advocating this sort of thing for a while now, and here's a little blurb from my blog: http://neilblanchard.vox.com/library...formation.html The idea is already out there -- they just mentioned it on the 'On Point' radio show about the renewed energy of inventors and tinkerers.

http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/11/...and-innovation

The idea is the most important thing, and spreading it around means that you get the input of everyone who uses the information.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 11-16-2009 at 12:07 PM.. Reason: added title
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 06:56 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
I was pretty sure that going electric rather than diesel was a huge mistake.

With a diesel Aptera, they could have had an easily 80 MPG car on the market (assuming the ever-elusive EPA OK) and made money until somebody came up with a workable battery.

But the went all-in that somebody could do what nobody has done in a century of trying...and lost.

The fruits of trying to be revolutionary in an evolutionary market. Crash & burn.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 07:08 PM   #7 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
Hello -

I gotta think their big loss was reversing the drivetrain. For the sake of stability, they went from a reverse-trike approach RWD (that resembles motorcycle reverse-trikes) to a FWD configuration. That must have cost them a ma$$ive redesign. I can only imagine the ARGHHHHHs that must have been bellowed in the R&D department when the decision to redesign it was made.

I hope someone saves the Aptera and it makes it to market.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 08:27 PM   #8 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...revised as a DIY "Kit" format...supply your own propulsion: diesel, electric, bicycle pedals, etc.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 10:50 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
This whole thing may be much more benign: there is still a shortage of money, and in order to stretch things until they get the DOE loan, Steve Fambro is taking a long vacation, and he'll be back the first of the year, and Chris Anthony has two other concerns (Epic boats and Flux Power battery systems) that he will focus fully on until the production gets going. It would be much more reassuring to see some photos of the production model, and hear lots of details, and hear about work that may be happening on the 2h (serial hybrid) model.

The change to front wheel drive came about 1 year ago, and it added regenerative braking and better handling. The more recent big changes were narrowing the front (it should under 7' out-to-out now) which was made possible by lowering the whole vehicle and moving the batteries under the floor -- and the roll down door windows. That may sound simple, but basically everything changed: the section is now more square and there is ~10% more interior room. Other big changes are: it has a front bumper (and a hood), the doors open up a lot wider (you do not have to duck to get in) and the rear is more substantial -- and they claim to have lowered the drag by 9%.

They have said in the past that they plan on a 2g gasoline version (diesel would not pass CA emissions) that should get ~100mpg. It probably would use a turbo 660cc power plant from a Japanese Kei car, so if it weighed ~1400 pounds (the 2e will weigh ~1700), then it will still be very good mileage, if not nearly as quick accelerating as the electric version.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 12:39 AM   #10 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
NeilBlanchard -

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
This whole thing may be much more benign: there is still a shortage of money, and in order to stretch things until they get the DOE loan, Steve Fambro is taking a long vacation, and he'll be back the first of the year, and Chris Anthony has two other concerns (Epic boats and Flux Power battery systems) that he will focus fully on until the production gets going. It would be much more reassuring to see some photos of the production model, and hear lots of details, and hear about work that may be happening on the 2h (serial hybrid) model.

The change to front wheel drive came about 1 year ago, and it added regenerative braking and better handling. The more recent big changes were narrowing the front (it should under 7' out-to-out now) which was made possible by lowering the whole vehicle and moving the batteries under the floor -- and the roll down door windows. That may sound simple, but basically everything changed: the section is now more square and there is ~10% more interior room. Other big changes are: it has a front bumper (and a hood), the doors open up a lot wider (you do not have to duck to get in) and the rear is more substantial -- and they claim to have lowered the drag by 9%.

They have said in the past that they plan on a 2g gasoline version (diesel would not pass CA emissions) that should get ~100mpg. It probably would use a turbo 660cc power plant from a Japanese Kei car, so if it weighed ~1400 pounds (the 2e will weigh ~1700), then it will still be very good mileage, if not nearly as quick accelerating as the electric version.
Hmmm. Why not just keep working for free or a dollar like Steve Jobs?

Yeah, the Aptera "looks" similar from the outside, but the changes are significant.

I want the 2g version (with a stickshift!).

CarloSW2

__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ordered an Aptera typ-1h Ptero General Efficiency Discussion 28 08-30-2019 09:07 AM
New Aptera NeilBlanchard General Efficiency Discussion 184 04-14-2011 12:17 AM
Is Aptera Blowing Their Chance? Big Dave General Efficiency Discussion 19 08-09-2009 04:54 AM
Road & Track road test of Aptera prototype (video + damage) MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 16 02-24-2009 11:26 PM
Video: (definitely worth checking) test drive of Aptera @ Popular Mechanics MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 30 10-20-2008 09:11 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com