Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-11-2011, 10:45 AM   #111 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
what about pulling both mirrors, but t then adding one of those fake shark fin antenna to the roof with a cam in it?

Probably still not a measurable difference either way, I bet.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2011, 05:27 AM   #112 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaspricesRhigh View Post
Being as how it is only 3-6% of the entire drag.. I don't think it's justifiable to remove the mirrors. The hassle of even having retractable mirrors doesn't seem worth it. A mirror is a needed safety feature.
If it's legal to do so, and you replace it with a camera that functionally replaces the mirrors, why not ?

3-6% of the total drag is a lot.


The biggest gain in fuel efficiency is to be made when buying an efficient car.
Beyond that, it's the combination of small improvements like this that give you great mileage.
Singled-out, most mods are not really impressive.
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2011, 07:00 AM   #113 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,537

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 125.37 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 85.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,019 Times in 568 Posts
Good point, euromodder. If we only did the mods that returned big savings, we would have very few to choose from, and leave a lot (collectively) on the table.

Many of the mods I've done to my Firefly are in the 2% range, as near as I have been able to measure.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2011, 07:04 AM   #114 (permalink)
Empty Pocketed Ecomodder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 626

Gen - '05 Liberty Sport
90 day: 22.09 mpg (US)

Blurry - '03 Focus SE
90 day: 35.31 mpg (US)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 53 Times in 42 Posts
many rain drops make a puddle, many puddles make a pond, many ponds make a lake, many lakes make an inland sea. little things add up, you might have a bunch of mods that only net 2-3% but if you have 10 that averages out to 20-30% improvement
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2011, 07:30 AM   #115 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 101

Fizz - '06 Fabia Combi
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 56.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
I feel a bit better about my 1.3% measured lower grille block now!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 12:02 AM   #116 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 3,940

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.22 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 30.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 501 Times in 306 Posts
I paid about $156 for two video cameras and two screens.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 09:12 AM   #117 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
Even at $200, that's 50g fuel, so if I get 3% better fuel economy than my current 53mpg, that's brings me up to 54.5mpg.

53mpg * 50 = 2650
54.5 *50 = 2725, an extra 75 miles per tank.

75/50=1.5 gallons saved per tank based on previous mpg
50*1.5=33.3e tanks before I start saving from the mod's benefits.

This is with fuel at $4/gal. It's $4.25 or higher for me, so payback time is less.


Realistically, most p people only use 75% tank capacity between fills. Scale the figures accordingly.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 09:52 AM   #118 (permalink)
60+ mpg at posted speeds
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 1,190

Black and Green - '98 Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 64.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 384
Thanked 166 Times in 113 Posts
I agree totally with the experienced voices chiming-in about small gains collectively making a big difference. I have been taking that kind of advice from this forum for weeks, and I am up to an average MPG in the mid-fifties (combined driving). I am using internal convex mirrors to replace both outside mirrors. I think that 3-6% savings is significant. Anyway, I am close to buying a spoon-type mirror to replace the drivers side, retractable on the freeway. That is only because of police, since it MIGHT not be legal in CA, where the law is vague as to whether the mirror must be outside on the driver's side. I will say with my two convex mirrors and modifications in my behavior as to how I check for lane changes, I believe there is no safety risk. I have no blind spots in my field of vision behind the car. In fact, I see more to the sides as well. But don't take my word for it. I give no legal advice or driving advice with this here email.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 10:54 AM   #119 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaspricesRhigh View Post
Only thing I would like to add is that a camera is expensive.
If you ever have to replace a heated, remotely adjustable mirror with built-in indicators, you'll wish they were as inexpensive as a camera
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 06:49 PM   #120 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 183
Thanks: 79
Thanked 86 Times in 38 Posts
I recently replaced the side mirrors on my 99 Saturn with side cameras, see photos. I also blocked off the grille and made covers for the headlight nacelles. All of those mods together have so far yielded a 16% increase, with the side mirror(s) removal accounting for about 5% of that.
I have side mirrors on the inside also, just in case a side cam fails. I'm getting comfortable with it all at this point. So far no overheating from the grille block with the A/C on. Next up are wheel covers and a belly pan.
I started to install an on demand hydrogen system on this car but found out when I installed the map adjuster and the EFIE 02 adjuster this computer does not take kindly to 'adjustments'. I've read since then the Saturn's ECU are one of the worst there is for tuning 'adjustments', so far I'd have to agree with them.
I disconnected the IAC, that seems to help a fair amount on the occasion I can coast a little. If I can find some info on how the IAC works exactly, I'd like to build an adjuster for it to control idle rpm better, like being able to dial in idle speed when the A/C is on.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Stage II grille block, cameras, headlight covers. wb.jpg (84.7 KB, 56 views)
File Type: jpg Before left side cam wb.jpg (79.1 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg Left sidecam wb.jpg (85.7 KB, 50 views)
File Type: jpg Driver's side cam in progress wb.jpg (71.0 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg Driver's side cam.jpg (70.9 KB, 43 views)
File Type: jpg Pass side cam wb.jpg (84.3 KB, 44 views)
File Type: jpg Upper Tailcam wb.jpg (109.0 KB, 42 views)
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to orbywan For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (05-07-2011), Piwoslaw (05-04-2011)
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com