Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-25-2014, 04:48 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sneek
Posts: 156

Focus - '05 Ford Focus tdci Futura
Thanks: 66
Thanked 34 Times in 24 Posts
On the bike thing. Why do speedcyclist have skinny tires and not the (safer) wider tire. More contact means more energy needed to move it. In your story i could mount a 365 tire and still use the same amont of energy.

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-25-2014, 04:59 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Posts: 313
Thanks: 6
Thanked 26 Times in 21 Posts
As with anything there are diminishing returns. At some point weight and lack of aero will overcome LRR. However, most road racing wheels were 19mm wide and now they are 22-25mm. Cars which as a total line have to meet mpg standards, will now more likely have 55 or 60 series tires on them rather than the old standard of 75 series. Good suspension work can hide most of the tire from the headwind,leaving the aero part of the equation a moot point.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2014, 06:43 AM   #13 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickelB NL View Post
On the bike thing. Why do speedcyclist have skinny tires and not the (safer) wider tire. More contact means more energy needed to move it. In your story I could mount a 365 tire and still use the same amount of energy.
I think what is going on here is that skinny tires use very high inflation pressures - and it's the inflation pressure that reduces the rolling resistance. But as was said, at the same pressure, the wider tire is better.

And using your example, if you could fit a 365 to your vehicle, it would be better for RR at the same pressure, but there would be other problems that would make that choice unsuitable. But if you reduce the pressure to solve some of those problems, then the RR goes downhill.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2014, 04:27 AM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
HypermilerAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Southern France
Posts: 159

AX - '95 Citröen AX

307 - '04 Peugeot 307 SW
Thanks: 12
Thanked 67 Times in 37 Posts
I think it's also about inflation pressure. I used to have Continental's Supersonics for races. They exist in 20 and 23 mm, but have different sidewall max's, 145 psi for the 23 mm and 175 psi for the 20 mm. At their respective maxs, I found the 20 mm to be better even at low speed. Plus the better aero and less weight. However this works only on perfect road surface. The 23 will be better on unperfect roads.

If a wider tire rolls better than a narrower tire, the surface of the contact patch being the same (same pressure, same weight), it's probably because the tire deforms less in the width than in the length. I guess that's why the tall and narrow concept will be the future according to industrials, less deformation in width and in length (larger diameter = smaller angle).

__________________
Citroën AX 1.5 D 430.000 km
Peugeot 307 SW 2.0 HDI 136 195.000 km

Last edited by HypermilerAX; 12-30-2014 at 04:43 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com