02-17-2010, 11:33 PM
|
#71 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 385
Thanks: 1
Thanked 54 Times in 42 Posts
|
KISS primary tube volume / size
so to maximize exhaust scavenging at partial load / cruise
it looks like the primary tube volume should be about equal to the volume of 1 cylinder's displacement or a little more .
and the primary pipe diameter should be the size that allows the flow to be around 240 fps
( as per the formula s posted already )
AT the rpm that optimum efficiency is sought at
but this does not take into account the reduced VE that will be there at partial load ....
is this resolved in the value of "X" you said to ask about ?
and what about the collector ?
|
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
02-18-2010, 12:04 PM
|
#72 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,351
Thanks: 56
Thanked 331 Times in 250 Posts
|
...as long as the Mach Index number (Z) does not exceed Z = 0.6, then volumetric efficiency (VE) is OK. But, as soon as Z > 0.6, VE declines rapidly:
Z < 0.5, VE increases
Z = 0.55, VE flattens
Z > 0.6, VE falls off (like a rock!).
...GOOGLE: "inlet-value Mach Index number" for details on relationship of VE to Z, and Z to valve (pipe) diameter and piston velocity (bore, stroke and engine RPM).
__________________
• 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
• 2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
• 2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
• 2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A
• 1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
• 1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
• 1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
• 1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
• 1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
Last edited by Old Tele man; 02-20-2010 at 03:36 PM..
|
|
|
|
02-18-2010, 01:22 PM
|
#73 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 385
Thanks: 1
Thanked 54 Times in 42 Posts
|
relative VE actual
thanks for the info provided so far .
now i have a lot of reading and studying to do ....
but .....
i believe
i have the ability to measure relative VE and it is going to be very much less than 100% at partial load .
my SWAG is
using calibrated pressure transducer threaded into a spark plug thread
and a scope NOT a gauge .
i can measure actual running compression PEAK compression pressure at WOT snap OR
cranking the starter , plugs out , throttle at WOT .
if i assign that a value of 100% ( actual value will be a little less than 100% )
then measure actual running compression at 2500 to 3k rpm
since i know or can determine ,
cylinder volume and compression ratio .
i should be able to calculate
the difference from WOT and Partial load
running compression measured peak pressure
and assign that value as
a multiplier
to determine ACTUAL flow at a the RPM
(which i measure the partial load running compression pressure at)
would then
be
the sought after approximate PRIMARY tube volume value as well ?
for optimum exhaust scavenging AT a chosen by myself partial load
does that make sense ?
Last edited by mwebb; 02-18-2010 at 01:27 PM..
Reason: to clarify measurement tools
|
|
|
|
02-18-2010, 02:38 PM
|
#74 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,351
Thanks: 56
Thanked 331 Times in 250 Posts
|
...if you're interested in extensive "number-crunching" and details. try checking out Larry Meaux's very reasonablly priced software, PipeMax ver. 3.6xp2 (he has a newer ver. 4.0 coming out soon)
...and, here's a good website about Mach Index: http://hemrickperformance.com/valve.aspx
__________________
• 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
• 2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
• 2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
• 2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A
• 1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
• 1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
• 1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
• 1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
• 1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
Last edited by Old Tele man; 02-20-2010 at 03:37 PM..
Reason: added "ver 4.0" info
|
|
|
|
02-18-2010, 11:52 PM
|
#75 (permalink)
|
|
ecomonkey
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: middleburg fl
Posts: 225
Thanks: 31
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
|
my brain hurts,, so i guess i should bark up another fe tree,, if i am deciptering all the engineer speak corectly, im sure it's good info,, if only i could understand it.lol.
__________________
|
|
|
|
02-18-2010, 11:53 PM
|
#76 (permalink)
|
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moonmonkey
my brain hurts,, so i guess i should bark up another fe tree,, if i am deciptering all the engineer speak corectly, im sure it's good info,, if only i could understand it.lol.
|
LOL. It's nice to have a background or at least study in another field that you can apply to the math. Looking at something from more than one perspective, in other words.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
|
02-19-2010, 08:33 AM
|
#77 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,351
Thanks: 56
Thanked 331 Times in 250 Posts
|
...it's all about " analogues & duals," ie, similar 'things' in different disciplines (fluidics, electronics, statics & dynamics, acoustics, chemistry, mathematics, etc.):
* RESISTANCE: electrical, acoustic, rectilineal, mechanical
* INDUCTANCE: inertance, mass, moment-of-inertia
* CAPACITANCE: electrical, acoustic, compliance, rotational
* VELOCITY:
* DISPLACEMENT:
* AREA:
* VOLUME:
* POWER:
* PRESSURE:
* TEMPERATURE:
...for instance, FFT is a mathematical technique used in electronics, vibration and shock, acoustic and optics analyses!
...once you've "suffered" through learning a technique or methodology, it can usually then be (rather) easily applied/transferred to multiple "other" disciplines...especially between electronics and mechanics!
...here's a good example published by Dr. Holbert, Arizona State University (ASU).
__________________
• 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
• 2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
• 2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
• 2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A
• 1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
• 1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
• 1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
• 1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
• 1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
Last edited by Old Tele man; 02-19-2010 at 05:44 PM..
|
|
|
|
02-19-2010, 02:15 PM
|
#78 (permalink)
|
|
Si engine and trans
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 53
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
LOL
Despite popular belief, everything that kills performance doesn't automatically improves fuel economy.
|
Improving efficiency does work both ways, but only to a point to where BSFC starts to take a dive...
__________________
~1990 Honda CRX HF - ZC SOHC 1.6L non-VTEC, Si trans, Illuminas, Neuspeed Race
1/8th: 9.90 @ 71.03, 60' - 2.41 (HMP '08) - 284K on chassis and ~110k on engine
~1996 Mustang GTS/248A - 1/4: 13.447 @ 99.75, 60' - 1.820 (HRP - 959' DA)
http://www.nearlysurrounded.com <-- Check out my band
|
|
|
|
|