Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-18-2010, 04:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles - Austin
Posts: 12
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This snowplow 'thingy' reduced the engine compartment pressure by....

I cut a small hole in the highest pressure area of this van's engine cover and installed a rubber hose. I got a clear plastic bottle half-filled with water and inserted this hose partially beneath the water surface.

I ran this van to 45 MPH by the time bubbles started to surface. This was in stock configuration.

I then 'installed' the snow plow and couldn't get any bubbling at 68 MPH. I slowed down since the speed limit was 60 and traffic didn't warrant a higher speed.

I never re-tested this at a higher speed and my question was/is: how many 'inch-pounds' were there before and after the snow plow change.

The fact that I wasn't getting any bubbles at 68 MPH obviously proves that the air was flowing easier 'around' this vehicle.

My Q is: Does anyone know the 'approximate' inch-pouns of pressure under the average hood, say at 60 MPH?

THX in advance!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
GreenTruckingConcepts.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 07:57 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 134

1991 Metro 1.0 Auto - '91 Metro Lsi Auto
Team Metro
90 day: 38.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 42
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Pressure is measured in PSI (pounds per square inch) but with the data given there's no way I know of to calculate anything for you're experiment other than the fact that you did reduce the pressure in the engine compartment.

Maybe if we knew the diameter of the tube, the depth of the liquid and where the end of the tube was in the liquid the bubble threshold could be found but even then all you would know is you were over this pressure first and then under this pressure second, but still no way to know how far.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 01:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 347
Thanks: 25
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
I for one think that bare wood "plow" needs to be painted with something sinister like evil teef or something.
__________________
2001 ZR2 Blazer e85/gas flex
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 02:12 PM   #4 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,037

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.85 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 28.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 266 Times in 204 Posts
...like the "sharks teeth" painted on Curtis P-40 Warhawks by Claire Chenault's American Volunteer Group (AVG).
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SIDI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 02:29 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles - Austin
Posts: 12
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The pressure won't come close to 'one' PSI in the engine compartment. Paint booths in body shops have a guage that measures 'increments' of a pound. I think I need to install one of these to find out.

THX
__________________
GreenTruckingConcepts.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 04:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
is not covered in bees.
 
Istas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Reading, PA, USA
Posts: 137

Car - '92 Legacy L (sedan)
90 day: 32.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Istas
I agree with Robert, there's no way to determine an actual number using this method. I do have a suggestion for a method that would be a lot more precise, and that I'm sure someone could devise a way to get actual pressure readings from.

For this method you'll want a road that's as straight and level as possible, and one where you can drive at a consistent speed.

Get a flat piece of wood (like plywood, say), about two feet high and about a foot wide. Also get a length of clear tube, I would say about four feet might suffice. Finding the right size of the inner diameter of the tube might require some experimentation, but I'm thinking maybe a half inch might do it. I imagine air tubing for a fish tank pump would be too narrow (but I don't know).

Fasten the tube in a U-shape onto the wood (without puncturing it), so that the upright portions of the tube are vertical and straight, and that the curved bottom part is not pinched enough to stop water from easily flowing through it.

Find somewhere in your vehicle to secure the piece of wood, where it is visible, so that it's vertical and doesn't move, with the open ends of the tube at the top. (you might also put it somewhere where the water accidentally spilling out won't ruin anything) Pour water into the tube (funnel will be handy) so that it's about half full.

Run that hose that's hooked up to the place in the engine bay where you're testing air pressure over to the clear tube, and connect it to the top of one of the open ends of the clear tube so that it's airtight. Leave the other end of the clear tube open.

Now, get in your car and start driving (without the plow at first, I'd recommend). This is where we experiment on if the clear tube is the right size or not. If the water levels don't move at all, or move so small a distance it would be difficult to measure changes (like, less than an inch), the clear tube is too big in inner diameter (or the connection's not airtight, or there's a clog in the hose, or the tube is pinched shut on the bottom). If water flows out the open end of the tube, or if you see bubbles passing through the water) then you need a clear tube with a larger inner diameter (or a smaller hole at the testing area).

Once you have the right size tube where the water will move a good amount at the speed you want to test (maybe about 3 to 6 inches), you can start comparing air pressures from different modifications. Mark where the water level is while the vehicle is stopped, and then mark where the water level is while at speed. You can compare the different water levels with and without the snowplow thing (and other mods as well), and this will give you a more precise comparison of the effects of different mods, even if you don't know the actual air pressure units. And if you supply the diameters of the hole, the hose, and the tube, as well as the water level changes, some enterprising individuals on here might even be able to calculate the actual pressure units.

This method could also be used to measure the pressure on the outside surfaces of the car, both high and low pressure areas. You could even do it without the holes in the car, just use a small enough hose at the location you want to test the pressure of, and make sure that the airflow isn't blowing directly into the hose. (I think pointing the test hose away from the wind would work best, if it's small the wake of it shouldn't mess with results too much, and at any rate it's located against the body of the car where airspeed is lowest, and pointing away would likely be more consistent than pointing it towards)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 05:09 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Leadville, CO
Posts: 509

Maroon Ballon - '98 Town & Country LXI
90 day: 26.42 mpg (US)

MaEsTRO - '95 Metro 5spd hatch, 3 cyl
Thanks: 47
Thanked 51 Times in 37 Posts
I'm not sure how useful this information would be. Having a few ounces per square inch under the hood benefits you how??

I think if you put a knife edge at the front of that thing, your road-kill will be a lot easier to butcher! Yuummmm!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thatguitarguy For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (03-18-2010)
Old 03-18-2010, 09:45 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,261

Appliance White - '93 Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Sprint Base
Thanks: 43
Thanked 139 Times in 105 Posts
A bubble bottle will measure the pressure difference between its two ends, but neither one is likely to be at atmospheric on a moving vehicle. You get about 1 oz of water pressure at 1.5" deep.
I tried a home-made pitot-tube rig on a boat once, and couldn't get it to agree with theory even approximately.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 09:54 PM   #9 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,037

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.85 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 28.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 266 Times in 204 Posts
..."metering orifice"
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SIDI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2010, 04:31 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,607
Thanks: 870
Thanked 636 Times in 372 Posts
units

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mandilon View Post
I cut a small hole in the highest pressure area of this van's engine cover and installed a rubber hose. I got a clear plastic bottle half-filled with water and inserted this hose partially beneath the water surface.

I ran this van to 45 MPH by the time bubbles started to surface. This was in stock configuration.

I then 'installed' the snow plow and couldn't get any bubbling at 68 MPH. I slowed down since the speed limit was 60 and traffic didn't warrant a higher speed.

I never re-tested this at a higher speed and my question was/is: how many 'inch-pounds' were there before and after the snow plow change.

The fact that I wasn't getting any bubbles at 68 MPH obviously proves that the air was flowing easier 'around' this vehicle.

My Q is: Does anyone know the 'approximate' inch-pouns of pressure under the average hood, say at 60 MPH?

THX in advance!
If you were looking for your 'ram' pressure at 60 mph,you'd be working with inches of water column pressure.Dwyer makes some reasonably priced pitot-tubes,U-tube manometers,and magnehelics which will provide you accurate low-pressure readings.
The 'snow plow' has completely blocked the ram air from the engine bay.If you can get a look at Hucho's book,I believe he has complete pressure profiles for some cars where you might see what you're interested in.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1992 Metro sedan needs a new engine - What/Where/How - advice appreciated greatly! Crono EcoModding Central 26 11-18-2008 02:42 AM
Moving air intake into the engine compartment? pasadena_commut Aerodynamics 5 07-25-2008 04:24 PM
Engine bay pressure? NismoMax80 Aerodynamics 11 07-03-2008 09:25 PM
Coasting experiment: engine on VS engine off on a fixed route = 12.9% gain MetroMPG Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 6 02-22-2008 09:38 AM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 12:38 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com