05-03-2010, 02:26 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shovel
External combustion would mean no gearbox whatsoever, you won't beat that with a manual or an auto.
|
Of course, you'd need a engine with a specific impulse of 3 million + seconds to beat the new Lupo TDI.  
|
|
|
|
05-03-2010, 02:29 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb
not possible?!? Are you serious? even the epa site lists the manual wtdi jetta ith a higher mpg than the auto.
Look, Manual is simpler/less expensive/less weight/more efficient/easier to get it to do what you want/more reliable.
Manual is the standard. Auto will always be trying to catch up, at great expense, stupid idea from an efficiency perspective.
|
Well, I looked up real world numbers on fueleconomy.gov. You were correct, the manual gets a touch better MPG in real world conditions. About 2%.
However, my experience is that the DSG matches my friends manual MPG here in Florida. (mostly fast highway).
|
|
|
|
05-03-2010, 07:21 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
With a lockup torque converter, all that is left is the ratio. I am not impressed with transmissions that shift them selves, no matter how they do it. I often joke that I don't know how to drive an automatic...
|
|
|
|
05-03-2010, 08:51 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,032
Thanks: 156
Thanked 259 Times in 203 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cujet
However, my experience is that the DSG matches my friends manual MPG here in Florida. (mostly fast highway).
|
Thats a little anecdotal. Honestly, take a look at the ecomodder garage
EcoModder Fleet list - EcoModder.com
skip past the first page of outliers till you get to some cars, and drill down on some of them. The top of the list is completely dominated by manual transmissions knocking EPA figures to the curb.
Manual allows for technique, and for you to use that awesome processor between your ears to make better energy management decisions, and it all becomes second nature in no time.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
|
05-04-2010, 09:16 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 18603, USA
Posts: 699
Thanks: 184
Thanked 47 Times in 34 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar
Uh, no on the manual part. The DCT can hold top gear but other than that the gears are automatically changed. And the clutch doesn't have a foot pedal. It's an automatic and even if it was sequential it would be a manual transmission in anyway. It uses a dry clutch so there's no more advantage for towing capacity anymore.
Some of the drag racers with big HP engines use 2 speed powerglides(an automatic) and they convert them to manual shift. Other than that there's no way to mix the two without building an entirely new transmission. I'd take a 6 speed manual with a 3rd pedal over the DCT.
|
It's electronically clutched, and electronically shifted. It's basically a dual-clutch style race transmission in a mass produced general sale car. 6 gears on two shafts, one clutch per shaft.
HowStuffWorks "How Dual-clutch Transmissions Work"
__________________
|
|
|
|
05-04-2010, 11:11 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,145
Thanks: 9
Thanked 98 Times in 78 Posts
|
Just get used to it and accept the facts.
Jetta TDI
Manual 30/41
Auto 30/42
Civic
manual 26/34
Auto 25/36
Fusion
Manual 22/29
Auto 22/31
5, 6 and 7 speed autos are becoming more and more common even in cheap cars. As they take over the market its only natural that they become more efficient than manuals.
|
|
|
|
05-04-2010, 11:49 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Pishtaco
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,278
Thanks: 39
Thanked 193 Times in 127 Posts
|
The 2006 Scion xB automatic is rated 26/31 v. the manual's 26/30. Does anyone, including tjts1, seriously think an automatic Scion is going to approach the 45.9 mpg I've gotten from my manual over the past 12,770 miles? I'd be happy to top low 40 mpg average, long term, with an automatic in the same vehicle.
__________________
Darrell
Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.4 mpg avg over 30,375 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
Clean Green Toaster Machine
45.8 mpg over 2235 miles, 164% of '08 EPA
|
|
|
|
05-04-2010, 12:22 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 148
Thanked 138 Times in 97 Posts
|
Agreed. I'm getting great mileage because it's a manual, and in spite of the gear ratios. If it was geared well, I could have another 5 mpg or so available. The whole reason autos are getting better mileage is because the manuals are crippled with horrible gear ratios.
The best automatic can only be as good as, but not better than, a manual transmission. (provided the gear ratios are equal) They still lack the flexibility to be exploited for maximum mileage the way a manual can be.
__________________
- - - - -Best 11-mile commute: 105 mpg
- - - - -Best tank: 88.5 mpg / 1133 miles
|
|
|
|
05-04-2010, 04:50 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,351
Thanks: 56
Thanked 331 Times in 250 Posts
|
...the underlying reason many auto's get better EPA mpg numbers than manuals is that they're computer-controlled and better "tuned" to the EPA city-urban loop testing.
...however, this "advantage" is quickly & easily defeated by driver stupidity!
...once they're in "lockup" it's simple axle-ratio(A) vs. axle-ratio(M).
__________________
• 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
• 2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
• 2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
• 2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A
• 1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
• 1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
• 1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
• 1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
• 1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
|
|
|
|
05-04-2010, 05:08 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
Driving the TurboWeasel
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Steuben County, NY
Posts: 458
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
|
My fiancee's Honda Fit auto gets okay mileage. About 30 combined. It shines on the highway since the 5th cog brings the highway RPM's down to ~2100 at 60 mph. The manual version is buzzing around 3000 RPM at the same speed.
Around town you have to drive it carefully since it wants to downshift at every little touch on the DBW accelerator. I've managed 42 mpg over 5 miles of dense city traffic before, without using many hypermiling techniques beyond driving sanely and timing lights. She gets about 27 mpg for the same trip.
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco 6MT
|
|
|
|
|