Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-20-2011, 06:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
grins2go_brett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 6
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Spats on front airdam?

Since finding and joining this site, I've begun to notice all sorts of things on cars and trucks related to aerodynamics. I've also thought how I might be able to apply some of these to my Dodge Sprinter to squeeze a few percentage points of fuel economy out of it. One that I noticed recently is on my girlfriends Honda CRV. I can't post a picture because of my low post count, but if you go here: "automobiles.honda.com/images/2011/cr-v/exterior-gallery/gal_lg11.jpg", you can see what I'm talking about. The bottom front area is sloped back like a skid plate would be on a larger truck. At the bottom of this there are 2 pieces that are lower than the rest of it. If they were in front of the tires, I would call them spats. But they are in addition to tire spats that are already there. And they are about equal distance from each other and from the inside edge of the tires. And there is nothing sticking down lower in the engine bay or suspension that they were covering up.

Now I seem to remember seeing a show on Speed Channel not long ago about the new Kenworth T700. They didn't go into details, but I remember seeing something similar on there, and it creating high pressure channels of air under the vehicle to help smooth out the airflow.

My question to you is does this sound plausible? There must be some merit to it because that picture is from the 2011 model and my girlfriends is an '07. It would be something very easy for me to make a few out of coroplast and attach to the existing air dam. Unfortunately, I don't have the time, equipment (scanguage), or resources (money) to do A-B-A testing. And my driving is too varied to say this is why I got 3% better mileage this tank over last. Mainly looking to the group to see if the theory is reasonable and sound...or complete BS. Thanks!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 06:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
Efficiency Aficionado
 
CigaR007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Province of Québec
Posts: 459

GreenTurtle - '01 Echo Sedan
90 day: 42.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 107
Thanked 75 Times in 62 Posts
For illustrative purposes !

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CigaR007 For This Useful Post:
grins2go_brett (10-20-2011)
Old 10-20-2011, 07:24 PM   #3 (permalink)
VW Polo Coupe '92 1.05
 
btracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 21

ecohok - '92 Polo Coupe CL
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
I've seen them too, on several cars. I'm just as you, very curious!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 01:37 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 801
Thanks: 46
Thanked 81 Times in 63 Posts
Generally "spats" are the covers over the wheel arch, such as seen in old 40's cars and on the 1st-gen Honda Insight.

I've seen the tabs you are talking about called "wheel air dams" or "wheel dams", and there are probably more technical names for them as well.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 02:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 140
Thanks: 69
Thanked 39 Times in 29 Posts
I think these:


I have no idea what they do.

-mort
Attached Images
File Type: jpg underTabs.jpg (43.0 KB, 118 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 02:42 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / SC
Posts: 658

1 Ton - '94 C3500
90 day: 19.7 mpg (US)

Big White Brick - '03 Express Van
90 day: 15.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 42 Times in 39 Posts
The look like an air deflector but not really sure. They are too small and odly placed to make sense.
Are they there to allow the suspension travel to not hit the belly pan?

My service route, like yours, varies a lot. I have had success overall with this :
The "Brick" gets a new air dam especially on the Interstate.
__________________
Support Bennelson !

I can't understand why my MPG's are so low..........
16000lb, 41' Toy Haulers are rough on FE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 02:58 PM   #7 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,351

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 331 Times in 250 Posts
...the 2009-2010 Pontiac Vibes also has "spats" in front of the front wheels:

__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2011, 12:54 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,975
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 807 Times in 469 Posts
squeeze

Quote:
Originally Posted by grins2go_brett View Post
Since finding and joining this site, I've begun to notice all sorts of things on cars and trucks related to aerodynamics. I've also thought how I might be able to apply some of these to my Dodge Sprinter to squeeze a few percentage points of fuel economy out of it. One that I noticed recently is on my girlfriends Honda CRV. I can't post a picture because of my low post count, but if you go here: "automobiles.honda.com/images/2011/cr-v/exterior-gallery/gal_lg11.jpg", you can see what I'm talking about. The bottom front area is sloped back like a skid plate would be on a larger truck. At the bottom of this there are 2 pieces that are lower than the rest of it. If they were in front of the tires, I would call them spats. But they are in addition to tire spats that are already there. And they are about equal distance from each other and from the inside edge of the tires. And there is nothing sticking down lower in the engine bay or suspension that they were covering up.

Now I seem to remember seeing a show on Speed Channel not long ago about the new Kenworth T700. They didn't go into details, but I remember seeing something similar on there, and it creating high pressure channels of air under the vehicle to help smooth out the airflow.

My question to you is does this sound plausible? There must be some merit to it because that picture is from the 2011 model and my girlfriends is an '07. It would be something very easy for me to make a few out of coroplast and attach to the existing air dam. Unfortunately, I don't have the time, equipment (scanguage), or resources (money) to do A-B-A testing. And my driving is too varied to say this is why I got 3% better mileage this tank over last. Mainly looking to the group to see if the theory is reasonable and sound...or complete BS. Thanks!
My opinion is that while these attachments might show up in the controlled environment of a climatic wind tunnel,you'd be hard pressed to notice any difference in real world driving,with,or without them.
And with respect to to the CRV nose itself,it is aerodynamically incorrect.
I realize that it is marketed as a SUV,and has the ubiquitous high clearance for the Rubicon,but for mpg it would need to be dropped and re-contoured to get the air around the nose,not under it.Same for the Sprinter.
A flexible lower section is virtually mandatory.
With respect to mpg for the Sprinter,the elephant in the living room would be the enormous turbulent wake behind the body.That's where your going to see your best gains from mods.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2011, 02:14 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Oakland, Ca
Posts: 61

'10 Kia Forte EX 2.0 - '010 Forte EX
90 day: 37.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
[QUOTE=Old Tele man;266601]...the 2009-2010 Pontiac Vibes also has "spats" in front of the front wheels:

My car has them in front of the rear wheels
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2011, 01:11 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
grins2go_brett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 6
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by some_other_dave View Post
Generally "spats" are the covers over the wheel arch, such as seen in old 40's cars and on the 1st-gen Honda Insight.

I've seen the tabs you are talking about called "wheel air dams" or "wheel dams", and there are probably more technical names for them as well.

-soD
Spats, air dams, dams, tabs...it's all semantics. From the responses here, I guess I won't worry about adding any to my Sprinter air dam for now. Seems like more real world research is needed to determine possible benefits, not just computers and wind tunnels. I am planning on adding some in front of the rear tires as there are not any currently. I also may increase the size of the front wheel dams at some point. Thanks!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com