Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-19-2010, 11:02 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 10

The Legend - '91 Legend LS
Last 3: 22.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sunroof shield removal question

Hello everyone!

Today I removed the sunroof cover/baffle/shield from my 1991 Legend. It's a plastic piece which screwed onto two clamps which were hooked inside the sunroof opening. I guess it's purpose was to prevent stuff from flying into the car when the sunroof was open. Pictures:
Before

After

(holy smokes it was dirty underneath it!)

Now, since this reduces the frontal area, it ought to lower the CdA. However, since the sunroof is now exposed, won't the non-smooth surface where the from of the sunroof is cause a flow separation? (and increase Cd...)

I'm expecting a bit of wind noise but hopefully nothing too unbearable.

Aerodynamics experts, what are your thoughts?

-Squriellord.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2010, 12:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
Grasshopper
 
alohaspirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 920

Makai - '01 Echo 4D Auto
90 day: 34.45 mpg (US)

Mauka - '00 Echo 4D Auto
90 day: 34.57 mpg (US)

Silver Surfer - '02 Jetta TDI
90 day: 35.93 mpg (US)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 28 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by squriellord View Post
Now, since this reduces the frontal area, it ought to lower the CdA. However, since the sunroof is now exposed, won't the non-smooth surface where the from of the sunroof is cause a flow separation? (and increase Cd...)
It does reduce your CdA (back to stock numbers)
But it wont cause flow separation unless you open your sunroof.
__________________
Past Present Future?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2010, 01:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
Tenderfoot
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bozeman Montana
Posts: 437

MagMetalCivic - '04 Civic EX
90 day: 37.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 127
Thanked 169 Times in 88 Posts
I used to have a 1990 Plymouth Laser/Mits Eclipse. I had a sun roof put in and had a little deflector for it. Without the deflector and the sun roof open, my car was an enormous coke bottle, there was this loud low pitch vibration from having the sunroof open. I don't expect the deflector of yours was preventing this.

The reason for your deflector I'd imagine was not for debris management, but rather it helped create a low pressure area so when you opened your sunroof a few inches, it would really draw a huge amount of air out of your car increasing circulation. And it probably helped with wind noise as well.

I think you're better off not having the deflector, and your "non-smooth surface" concerns are unwarranted. Significant flow separation requires more drastic obstacles than what the little bumps on your sunroof present....don't worry about it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2010, 01:45 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 10

The Legend - '91 Legend LS
Last 3: 22.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by alohaspirit View Post
It does reduce your CdA (back to stock numbers)
But it wont cause flow separation unless you open your sunroof.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
I think you're better off not having the deflector, and your "non-smooth surface" concerns are unwarranted. Significant flow separation requires more drastic obstacles than what the little bumps on your sunroof present....don't worry about it.
Okay, thanks guys. I'll won't loose any sleep over it! The sunroof stays closed most of the time anyways.
I think that any FE increase would be very small, but 'it's the many little changes which make the difference'.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2010, 03:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
That thing you took off wasn't there to begin with.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 01:25 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
SwamiSalami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Republic of Korea
Posts: 290

2LT's Tank - '010 Element EX
Thanks: 133
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
That thing you took off wasn't there to begin with.
Nice call, Frank Lee. Being that we refer to the art of boosting a car's efficiency as "ecomodding", what would we call the art of making a car less efficient?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 01:55 PM   #7 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
It's usually called "hot rodding". Sometimes I call it "Rice", and I have some other names for it that are not printable here.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
SwamiSalami (08-04-2011)
Old 08-04-2011, 02:11 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
SwamiSalami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Republic of Korea
Posts: 290

2LT's Tank - '010 Element EX
Thanks: 133
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
oh, c'mon, Frank Lee. We can do better than that. I'm getting tingly hair on the back of my neck. Perhaps we should persuade the powers that be to provide us with a forum topic of this sort. This way, when we see this happening, we can photograph or document it for other ecomodders' enjoyment.

Because, it is quite enjoyable. At first, it was frustrating, but now I just laugh. Another great example is rims.

See? This is a great topic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 09:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
larrybuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: sw Washington (state), a little north of Vancouver
Posts: 702
Thanks: 177
Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts
OK! That's a good start. We want to save fuel, and make the drivetrain last longer, right?

Mask it off, and spray that sunroof top flat black to cool your interior, and can some AC usage!

Oh how I despise sunroofs! I feel better now!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 09:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
SwamiSalami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Republic of Korea
Posts: 290

2LT's Tank - '010 Element EX
Thanks: 133
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by larrybuck View Post
Mask it off, and spray that sunroof top flat black to cool your interior, and can some AC usage!
Hey Larry, don't you mean white instead of black? Black absorbs heat, while white reflects it.

all the best


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Tags
aero mod

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-split ductless question.. Xringer Saving@Home 50 05-25-2010 04:01 PM
Starting Infiniti Q45 underbelly shield... mcrews Aerodynamics 12 12-17-2009 12:19 PM
Tires question RandomFact314 EcoModding Central 18 04-20-2009 11:30 AM
Question about EOC with an Auto... :confused: LastBoyScout Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 20 08-30-2008 06:28 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com