Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2012, 04:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 623

White Whale - '07 Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 33.32 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 119 Times in 67 Posts
Taller rear tires on RWD vehicle

I've been thinking over this potential mod for a while and wanted to get other's opinions. Would there be an advantage to running taller rear tires on a rear wheel drive vehicle (such as my pickup)?

The advantage of a taller tire is supposed to be lower engine RPM's becuase the powertrain has effectively been re-geared lower. Typically, however, people who go to taller tires (all around) see FE decrease. The thinking hear is that the taller tires hurt the aero because the effective frontal area has increased. Some people also cite the higher rotational mass. Another factor is that many taller tires, tend to generally have higher rolling resistances.

So here's my thinking. If you went to taller tires, but only on the rear of a RWD pickup, you'd get the gearing benefit without the aero penealty, right?

Anybody tried it?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Diesel Dave

~Life is an optimization problem.~

~Who says that just because your vehicle weighs over 3 tons that you can't get good mileage?~

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 06:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hamburg, New York
Posts: 49

The TACO - '011 Tacoma Base 4x4 single cab short bed
90 day: 21.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I got slightly. Bigger tires on my ford ranger and I see a decent mpg increase, like 2 mpg. Also, the reason people think they get worse mileage is because people don't re-calibrate theirs speedo and odometer. A bigger tire will make your speedo read slower, so your odometer will show less miles than actual miles driven. If you put bigger tires on, make sure you get your speedo recalibrated, or if your trucks older like mine figure out the percentage it's off and factor that In to figure out your true mileage. Oh by the way the tires that are supposed to be on my truck are 225-70-14 and I put on 225-75-15 so they're around 2 inches taller and they throw my speedometer off by 7.11% (when I'm doing 60 my speedo will read 56). So whenever I fill up and want to figure out my mileage, I multiply the distance on the odo by 1.0711 and find out my actual miles travelled.

Last edited by BackroadBomber; 01-13-2012 at 06:43 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 09:06 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
royanddoreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: glovertown nl canada
Posts: 14

The Rig - '010 glk 350 4matic
90 day: 24.01 mpg (US)

z - '03 350z touring
90 day: 28.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
well put!!! I am thinking of going 1" taller, good to hear you got 2 mpg better, I'm sure I will do as good. Thanks for the info!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 01:46 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Rick323's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northeast Pa
Posts: 43

tacoma - '05 Tacoma 4x4 TRD
90 day: 21 mpg (US)

The silver boat - '99 F250 xlt
90 day: 19.93 mpg (US)

Bluebird - '04 sunfire se
90 day: 37.56 mpg (US)

Versys - '08 versys
90 day: 57.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I went from 235/85/16 to 255/85/16 on the rear of my F250. I don't know if my fuel mileage went up or down (I don't think it went down). The only thing I think it will affect is the abs. My Ford only had rear abs (4 wheel abs was an option in 99).
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 06:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 897

2004 CTD - '04 RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.37 mpg (US)
Thanks: 259
Thanked 130 Times in 107 Posts
It's an expensive way to barely increase one performance parameter while being detrimental to others, IMO. But I would start by searching commercial operators: Hotshot, LTL, etc, for other than anecdotal on 8,000-lb pickup trucks under 24,000-lb trailers one direction, and deadheading others. Kind of like a GV O-D. I don't recall having "seen" a benefit in my reading in those forums on this, and long ago shelved the idea. Maybe something newer has come along. A place to start is a large-area search on a contributor to many forums -- RV & commercial -- JIMNLIN, as he made a living going back 30-years with pickup trucks in service. Also owns a Dodge. A good source of what works well for tires on these trucks.
__________________
2004.0 7,360-lb DODGE Ram QC/LB 2500 2WD/6-speed Cummins 305/555 ISB. Stock, except LEER bed topper and twin muffler exhaust. 180,000 miles at 4,625-hrs @ 39 mph. 15-cpm solo, 25-cpm towing. (22-mpg avg past 37k)

Fuel Log
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 07:13 AM   #6 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern CT, USA
Posts: 1,074

Lean Burn Civic - '97 Civic HX
Team Honda
90 day: 51.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 87 Times in 63 Posts
I've seen VW beetle people call this a "rubber overdrive". But I suspect they're resizing all four wheels.

The increased rotating mass of the bigger tire will be negative for city stop and go driving - due to you have to accelerate that mass all the time. On the highway the increased rotating mass doesn't hurt you nearly as much.
__________________
Check your tire pressure - keep it up !!

We've learned that diet has a closer relationship to cancer than we ever thought. Please see this Wikipedia article on The China Study.

Driving Lean Burn '97 Civic HX, lotsa mods by now! '89 Volvo 240 is semi-retired. I did love that car though!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 10:18 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wi.
Posts: 75
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Everybody did that in high school, usually included air shocks & cragars.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 11:31 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 1,362

The Q - '02 Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 331
Thanked 183 Times in 127 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackroadBomber View Post
I got slightly. Bigger tires on my ford ranger and I see a decent mpg increase, like 2 mpg. Also, the reason people think they get worse mileage is because people don't re-calibrate theirs speedo and odometer. A bigger tire will make your speedo read slower, so your odometer will show less miles than actual miles driven. If you put bigger tires on, make sure you get your speedo recalibrated, or if your trucks older like mine figure out the percentage it's off and factor that In to figure out your true mileage. Oh by the way the tires that are supposed to be on my truck are 225-70-14 and I put on 225-75-15 so they're around 2 inches taller and they throw my speedometer off by 7.11% (when I'm doing 60 my speedo will read 56). So whenever I fill up and want to figure out my mileage, I multiply the distance on the odo by 1.0711 and find out my actual miles travelled.
exactly!
__________________
ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First, Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Second, Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

third, rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip! http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2012, 05:20 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 623

White Whale - '07 Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 33.32 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 119 Times in 67 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackroadBomber View Post
I got slightly. Bigger tires on my ford ranger and I see a decent mpg increase, like 2 mpg. Also, the reason people think they get worse mileage is because people don't re-calibrate theirs speedo and odometer. A bigger tire will make your speedo read slower, so your odometer will show less miles than actual miles driven. If you put bigger tires on, make sure you get your speedo recalibrated, or if your trucks older like mine figure out the percentage it's off and factor that In to figure out your true mileage. Oh by the way the tires that are supposed to be on my truck are 225-70-14 and I put on 225-75-15 so they're around 2 inches taller and they throw my speedometer off by 7.11% (when I'm doing 60 my speedo will read 56). So whenever I fill up and want to figure out my mileage, I multiply the distance on the odo by 1.0711 and find out my actual miles travelled.
Glad to hear that you've seen a benefit. I've looked into it and you are one of the few that's seen FE go up. Certainly the speedo needs recalibrated for different tire sizes. From what I've heard, I'd say fewer than 1 in 10 people report better FE with taller tires (after speedo re-calibration).
__________________
Diesel Dave

~Life is an optimization problem.~

~Who says that just because your vehicle weighs over 3 tons that you can't get good mileage?~

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2012, 05:34 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 1,362

The Q - '02 Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 331
Thanked 183 Times in 127 Posts
actually dave, quite a few have.
As a general note, frank lee commented that trucks doent see a benift.
But the trick to the equation is how much highway miles you are driving vs city driving.
Also you cant be going from 15 rims to 17 rims, because then the issue is the extra wieght. But a 4-7% increase in diameter (given hwy driving) absolutely will result in betterr mpg.

Just common sense alone would have to question your 1 in 10 statement.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First, Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Second, Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

third, rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip! http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com