Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-11-2009, 02:52 PM   #81 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hypermiler01 View Post
But I am sure that everyone here, including yourself, is already well aware that the required angle of taper is not the same for all speeds, but varies in direct proportion to speed, and that what I said about faster speeds needing a longer, more gradual angle to prevent detachment is the truth.
At the speeds automobiles travel, Cd is effectively constant.

Otherwise we'd be provided qualifying data (test speeds) by automakers & testers to put their figures in context, and without that context it would be impossible to compare different vehicles' drag coefficients to one another.

Quote:
The drag coefficient can be considered constant for objects moving at high Re, e.g. a car at highway speed - source
Quote:
When the flow is turbulent the Reynolds number is large, and the drag coefficient CD is approximately constant. - source
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
drag coefficients are stable up to transonic flow
I'll be the first to admit I'm far from being an expert in the subject of aero, but that seems like a pretty fundamental concept.

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-11-2009, 04:49 PM   #82 (permalink)
93 Metro Streamliner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 180

AeroMetro - '93 Geo Metro
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 7 Posts
Reynolds number


When the speed doubles, the Reynolds number also doubles and that is what causes the flow to detach. That is why fast cars need a more sloped shape than slow cars to have attached flow. And why the VW Beetle may have perfectly attached flow at, just for example, 20 mph, but does terribly on the highway.

That comparison picture I made shows the two different shapes with the exact same condition settings.

The major difference at the front is that the extreme wedge shape has almost NO STAGNATION. 100% of the air is scooped over the top and sides, leaving flow underneath completely unmolested. Well, since that is 2D, it is all scooped over the top. The effect is the same for 3D, just integrate to get the effect of a bunch of thin slices stacked together.

Last edited by hypermiler01; 03-11-2009 at 04:56 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 05:08 PM   #83 (permalink)
93 Metro Streamliner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 180

AeroMetro - '93 Geo Metro
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
In general, Cd is not an absolute constant, for a given shape body. It varies with the speed of airflow (or more generally with Reynolds number). A smooth sphere, for example, has a Cd that varies from about 0.47 for laminar (slow) flow to 0.1 for separated (faster) flow.
Drag coefficient - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Last edited by hypermiler01; 03-11-2009 at 10:22 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 07:40 PM   #84 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Sure, that wikipedia quote is correct - for small, smooth spheres where the comparison is between a low Reynolds number regime (laminar) against turbulent flow.

But you're skipping over the important point that at high Reynolds numbers, for large objects like cars, the change in speed does not significantly affect Cd. Which is what was said in the three sources quoted.

Here's a fourth:

Quote:
cD ... remains nearly constant for large Re#'s in the laminar region and approaches a constant value after the transitional region. As a car is very wide compared to something like a tennis ball, the Reynolds number is high - very high in fact (on order of 10^6 @ 55mph and 10^5 at ~3mph). - source
And a fifth:

Quote:
In general, the dependence of [production cars'] drag coefficients on Reynolds number is very small and sudden changes do not occur. This demonstrates that the predominant part of the drag of these vehicles is pressure drag. (Source: Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles, Hucho Ed., 1998)
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
Cd (11-07-2010)
Old 03-12-2009, 01:01 AM   #85 (permalink)
93 Metro Streamliner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 180

AeroMetro - '93 Geo Metro
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 7 Posts
cD 0.07 Nuna, World Solar Challenge winner 2001-2007

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 01:51 AM   #86 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 460

WonderWagon - '94 Ford Escort LX
Last 3: 51.52 mpg (US)

DaBluOne - '99 Ford Escort SE
90 day: 48.97 mpg (US)

DaRedOne - '99 Ford Escort ZX2 Hot
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 4 Posts
Two more views of the nose of the Nuna 4.



  Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 01:02 PM   #87 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Hi,

The wheel shrouds and cockpit canopy are blunt, and really, so is the leading edge of the "solar wing" body. It is very slim and the "angles" of the (curved) surfaces are gentle, so the radius does not have to be very big -- but it is there, and it is not a sharp edge.

But, the leading angles are pretty close to the trailing angles, so -- it that why this has the lower Cd? Also, this "car" is about as un-streetable as you can get, and it doesn't enclose very much volume. So, vehicles like the Aptera are compromising (!!!) in order to have two people in comfort, have ease of entry, and practical cargo space, etc. -- and not have an 8-10 foot long nose sticking out in front...
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 03-12-2009 at 09:44 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 06:58 PM   #88 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
in reverse

Chrysler's Carl Breer knew that cars would go better backwards because his team took a car body off it's chassis and re-installed it reversed, to find that it went faster and got better mpg.Before the 1934 introduction of his Chrysler Airflow,he hired a professional race car driver for a publicity stunt,by driving a Chrysler DeSoto across the U.S. "backwards",to demonstrate the aerodynamic point of the upcoming Airflow.---------------------------------------------- America didn't get it.They still don't.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 07:06 PM   #89 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
ideal

Quote:
Originally Posted by hummingbird View Post
I think the ideal shape is neither the forward teardrop nor the reverse one. The objective here is to avoid a detached flow- the forward teardrop pushes a sizable wall of air, the reverse one allows turbulence to form at the end face, increasing drag.

The Ideal shape would be a combined teardrop with the front end formed by a reverse teardrop tail and the back end formed by a normal teardrop tail. The intermediate section can be tubular shape that then reaps benefit of a parting already taken place - something like the bullet trains of Shinkansen Japan or TGV France.
The "ideal" teardrop has the lowest drag for subsonic flow.If you lengthen the nose forward, the drag goes up do to increased skin friction.Anything you do to alter the "ideal" teardrop increases it's drag.That's why they refer to it as "ideal".
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 07:51 PM   #90 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 460

WonderWagon - '94 Ford Escort LX
Last 3: 51.52 mpg (US)

DaBluOne - '99 Ford Escort SE
90 day: 48.97 mpg (US)

DaRedOne - '99 Ford Escort ZX2 Hot
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Anything you do to alter the "ideal" teardrop increases it's drag.That's why they refer to it as "ideal".
Does it necessarily follow that putting a sharper nose on a streamlined half-body will increase Cd?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Index of Phil Knox Aerodynamics Seminars & Mod-data lists TestDrive Aerodynamics 21 11-21-2022 09:57 AM
Aerodynamics Seminar #1 - by Phil Knox MetroMPG Aerodynamics 7 08-08-2012 06:00 PM
Hexagonal Dimples as a way to improve aerodynamics Palionu Aerodynamics 29 10-27-2009 12:39 AM
Aerodynamics Seminar # 5 - by Phil Knox MetroMPG Aerodynamics 4 01-29-2008 01:41 PM
Aerodynamics Seminar # 4 - by Phil Knox MetroMPG Aerodynamics 0 01-28-2008 08:36 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com