09-29-2009, 12:30 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
|
Good point.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.
-- Author kept secret.
Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)
|
|
|
|
09-29-2009, 02:43 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 347
Thanks: 25
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
|
I'd go for such a contraption... but definitely would put the wheel farther back to retain the rear seats. No need for the back trunk, unless these cars have dual engines there's room for a trunk up front. Just have to be careful loading it so you don't wind up with spears through your body in a collision.
__________________
2001 ZR2 Blazer e85/gas flex
|
|
|
|
09-29-2009, 05:26 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shovel
I'd go for such a contraption... but definitely would put the wheel farther back to retain the rear seats. No need for the back trunk, unless these cars have dual engines there's room for a trunk up front. Just have to be careful loading it so you don't wind up with spears through your body in a collision.
|
They're front engine, still, I'd assume. I believe those are just suspended third wheel designs.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.
-- Author kept secret.
Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)
|
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 01:36 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,006
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
|
With the solid rear axle of the j-bodies, it wouldn't be that hard to build a single rear wheel structure right onto the axle. That's assuming they kept the rear axle.
__________________

Winter daily driver, parked most days right now

Summer daily driver
|
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 02:55 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 1,651
Thanks: 539
Thanked 93 Times in 54 Posts
|
Nice find ! Where did you find these at Frank ?
|
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 06:39 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
.........................
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 380
Thanks: 25
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
I actually worked up a sled trike conversion on CAD many years ago but my former employer is way too stupid to investigate something like that.
<snip>
The Arctic Cat's rear end needs to be much much lower and the rear wheel further back. Needs a windshield too. This thing has gotta be WICKED FAST  I think I'd like to do that to a four stroker.
|
That sled reminded me of two things.
1) You can buy basically the same thing right now: BRP Can-Am Spyder Roadster
I've seen a couple driving around.
2) There was recently a converted snowmachine racing at Bonneville. There's a few more pics, including some in the pits, if you poke around on that site.
Combine the two and you'd have a fast, fun, efficient commuter.
-Mike
|
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 07:55 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 459
Thanks: 10
Thanked 120 Times in 68 Posts
|
Talking about reverse trikes, here's a fun toy for sand jockeys. Low center of gravity, unsinkable heavy-duty Kevlar track & legendary Vmax performance (0-60 @2.8 sec!)
|
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 09:16 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
chop suey
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,639
Thanks: 559
Thanked 690 Times in 491 Posts
|
Cat actually tried to market such a thing to the military back in the day for desert ops...
|
|
|
|
11-25-2009, 04:46 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,402
Thanks: 123
Thanked 123 Times in 87 Posts
|
Saw the first one again, driving past the window at work. It definitely lives in Texas. If it's not the same car, it's a twin.
__________________
- - - - -Best 11-mile commute: 105 mpg
- - - - -Best tank: 88.5 mpg / 1133 miles
|
|
|
|
07-15-2010, 06:17 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 347
Thanks: 25
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
They're front engine, still, I'd assume. I believe those are just suspended third wheel designs.
|
It'd be a lot cooler if the front engine was omitted entirely and they had a 250cc twist-n-go scooter engine/trans (like from a honda helix?) in back. Gut as much weight as possible and you got a decent city vehicle with almost no maintenance required.
But no A/C :P 
__________________
2001 ZR2 Blazer e85/gas flex
|
|
|
|
|