Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-29-2009, 12:30 AM   #11 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
Good point.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 02:43 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 347
Thanks: 25
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
I'd go for such a contraption... but definitely would put the wheel farther back to retain the rear seats. No need for the back trunk, unless these cars have dual engines there's room for a trunk up front. Just have to be careful loading it so you don't wind up with spears through your body in a collision.
__________________
2001 ZR2 Blazer e85/gas flex
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 05:26 PM   #13 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by shovel View Post
I'd go for such a contraption... but definitely would put the wheel farther back to retain the rear seats. No need for the back trunk, unless these cars have dual engines there's room for a trunk up front. Just have to be careful loading it so you don't wind up with spears through your body in a collision.
They're front engine, still, I'd assume. I believe those are just suspended third wheel designs.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 01:36 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
wagonman76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,006

Red Car - '89 Celebrity CL 4 door
Team Chevy
90 day: 36.47 mpg (US)

Winter Wagon - '89 6000 LE Wagon
90 day: 28.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
With the solid rear axle of the j-bodies, it wouldn't be that hard to build a single rear wheel structure right onto the axle. That's assuming they kept the rear axle.
__________________

Winter daily driver, parked most days right now


Summer daily driver
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 02:55 PM   #15 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 1,651
Thanks: 539
Thanked 93 Times in 54 Posts
Nice find ! Where did you find these at Frank ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 06:39 PM   #16 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 380

Silverado - '03 Silverado W/T
Pickups
90 day: 17.89 mpg (US)

Ninja 650R - '06 Ninja 650R
90 day: 52.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I actually worked up a sled trike conversion on CAD many years ago but my former employer is way too stupid to investigate something like that.

<snip>

The Arctic Cat's rear end needs to be much much lower and the rear wheel further back. Needs a windshield too. This thing has gotta be WICKED FAST I think I'd like to do that to a four stroker.
That sled reminded me of two things.

1) You can buy basically the same thing right now: BRP Can-Am Spyder Roadster
I've seen a couple driving around.

2) There was recently a converted snowmachine racing at Bonneville. There's a few more pics, including some in the pits, if you poke around on that site.

Combine the two and you'd have a fast, fun, efficient commuter.

-Mike
__________________
2003 Silverado:
Aero Mods


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 07:55 PM   #17 (permalink)
PSmodder lurker
 
botsapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 459
Thanks: 10
Thanked 120 Times in 68 Posts
Talking about reverse trikes, here's a fun toy for sand jockeys. Low center of gravity, unsinkable heavy-duty Kevlar track & legendary Vmax performance (0-60 @2.8 sec!)

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 09:16 PM   #18 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,639

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 559
Thanked 690 Times in 491 Posts
Cat actually tried to market such a thing to the military back in the day for desert ops...
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2009, 04:46 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,402

PaleCivic - '96 Civic DX Sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 72.37 mpg (US)
Thanks: 123
Thanked 123 Times in 87 Posts
Saw the first one again, driving past the window at work. It definitely lives in Texas. If it's not the same car, it's a twin.
__________________
- - - - -Best 11-mile commute: 105 mpg
- - - - -Best tank: 88.5 mpg / 1133 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 06:17 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 347
Thanks: 25
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
They're front engine, still, I'd assume. I believe those are just suspended third wheel designs.
It'd be a lot cooler if the front engine was omitted entirely and they had a 250cc twist-n-go scooter engine/trans (like from a honda helix?) in back. Gut as much weight as possible and you got a decent city vehicle with almost no maintenance required.

But no A/C :P


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2001 ZR2 Blazer e85/gas flex
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MPGuino release one workspace dcb OpenGauge / MPGuino FE computer 999 12-14-2011 01:18 PM
Hi, long time lurker, decided to register. Vwbeamer Introductions 2 01-10-2009 06:19 PM
Good take on things (long) Daox General Efficiency Discussion 8 08-30-2008 05:11 PM
Long time modder, 1st time poster :) JohnnyGrey Introductions 8 04-29-2008 07:38 PM
Long time GS/Ecomodder lurker LostCause Introductions 6 02-24-2008 09:52 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com