Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-18-2012, 02:33 PM   #111 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 40 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
I checked the exhaust on my old Nissan Z car engine once. At idle it was not even 200 degrees. I think the amount of heat you need to "instantly" turn water into steam just isn't there after expansion of the combustion gasses.
I'm not sure that's right either... but drain the water from your old Z car, rendering the cooling system useless, and as the temperature continues to rise. You WILL melt the ring lands off the pistons, eventually ruin the temper of the aluminum that the head is made from and loosen the valve seats, then drop a seat and valve. The exhaust temp might be a lot hotter at idle, if your Z car didn't have a cooling system.

If in a conventional 4 stroke engine, 30% of the BTUs from a unit of gasoline are turning into work, the other 70% turned into heat, but you find a way to turn say, half of that heat into work within the combustion chamber... you have much less waste heat to get rid of. You might not need a conventional cooling system at all.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-18-2012, 03:26 PM   #112 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Will somebody actually up and build an engine that actually takes advantage of direct water injection into the combustion chamber, already? And have it power a production car down the road?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 07:06 AM   #113 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 72
Thanks: 6
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Consider this possibility. 4cyl engine. Substitute radiator with heat exchanger. Fabricate waterjacket around exhaust system. Run two cylinders in conventional manner. Control steam flow in remaining cylinders using exhaust valve as steam inlet, intake valve now becomes steam exhaust. Condense post power producing steam back to a liquid. Pump liquid back into heat exchanger.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 07:21 AM   #114 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by smokey442 View Post
Consider this possibility. 4cyl engine. Substitute radiator with heat exchanger. Fabricate waterjacket around exhaust system. Run two cylinders in conventional manner. Control steam flow in remaining cylinders using exhaust valve as steam inlet, intake valve now becomes steam exhaust. Condense post power producing steam back to a liquid. Pump liquid back into heat exchanger.
Needs unconventional valve timing to pull off and increased piston clearance, but sounds plausible. You might want more cylinders for NVH reduction, maybe like, a V6 with each bank running like an inline 3 in terms of "firing order", one side fired by gasoline the other steam driven, rather than having 2 gasoline powered cylinders which is not very smooth.

Doing it this way would have higher peak thermal efficiency than for example BMW turbosteamer, since you are using a piston and not a turbine, but it would have much lower specific power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 09:22 PM   #115 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
I don't think steam works so well in high speed piston setups like a gas engine.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 11:03 PM   #116 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
I don't think steam works so well in high speed piston setups like a gas engine.
That's probably true, it would incur higher pumping losses as a proportion of total work due to the low pressure nature of steam.

Compact steam turbine would have the same issue to a lesser degree, and I have the feeling that small steam turbines would suffer pretty big efficiency penalties.

SMA band engines and thermoelectric generators have inherently lower efficiency but if the technology brings them up to around the same efficiency (as a percentage of ideal cycle efficiency) as mechanical engines, it's a no brainer since they are much simpler and lighter.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6 stroke engine idea? fredd7924 EcoModding Central 24 04-27-2010 08:00 PM
Thoughts on my grill block? gascort Aerodynamics 4 07-03-2008 02:23 PM
Thoughts for bumper stickers- regor EcoModding Central 6 06-27-2008 10:11 PM
Opportunity Parking - Thoughts? SVOboy Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 21 01-12-2008 12:24 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com