Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Motorcycles / Scooters
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-20-2013, 06:51 PM   #51 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 304

sr185 bullet - '81 Yamaha SR185 streamliner
Team Streamliner
90 day: 96.35 mpg (US)

Sunny Colarado - '06 Chevrolet Colarado WT
90 day: 24.18 mpg (US)

cbr250s - '12 Honda cbr250
90 day: 115.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by godscountry View Post
very nice,i suggest if you haven't seen it,is the Honda 125,built with a streamlined body, despite weighing a extra 88 lbs,it doubled his mileage to over 200 mpg.He has some nice photos on how he did the body,might be worth,spending some time checking it out.Also you might try to find some information about the BMW Simple concept vehicle,because the body has a drag coefficient 0.18,but the best part,it is all flat panels,you could do some measurements from the photos and using a large paper cutter ,cut sheets of Aluminum,Their are some nice panels available,I will give you the link,take care.214 MPG DIY Super-Aerodynamic Modified Honda 125cc Motorbike : TreeHugger
I have seen the honda streamliner, and the simple. they are both great vehicles, and there are many other excellent examples of well built streamlining, but I can't find one that is available to the general public at a reasonable price. so, I will make my own.

all flat panels is not a good design for a bike due to side wind stability issues.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-28-2013, 05:45 PM   #52 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 304

sr185 bullet - '81 Yamaha SR185 streamliner
Team Streamliner
90 day: 96.35 mpg (US)

Sunny Colarado - '06 Chevrolet Colarado WT
90 day: 24.18 mpg (US)

cbr250s - '12 Honda cbr250
90 day: 115.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
Does anyone know what the cam timing is supposed to be on my bike? I was going over it in preparation for attempting to tune up the engine, and I checked the cam sprocket vs the mark on the rotor, and they don't line up perfectly. the mark on the rotor is just past center when the mark on the cam lines up. would this be considered advanced, or retarded? and what effect will it have?

Last edited by bschloop; 01-30-2013 at 10:09 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 06:48 PM   #53 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Depends of the direction of rotation of the engine. If the cam mark is after the mark in the direction of rotation it is advanced. It would reach the mark before the crank had reached its proper mark which means the cam is advanced in realtion to the crank.

regards
Mech

Last edited by user removed; 01-28-2013 at 07:02 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 07:01 PM   #54 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 304

sr185 bullet - '81 Yamaha SR185 streamliner
Team Streamliner
90 day: 96.35 mpg (US)

Sunny Colarado - '06 Chevrolet Colarado WT
90 day: 24.18 mpg (US)

cbr250s - '12 Honda cbr250
90 day: 115.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
the cam mark is after the rotor mark in the direction of rotation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 07:25 PM   #55 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 304

sr185 bullet - '81 Yamaha SR185 streamliner
Team Streamliner
90 day: 96.35 mpg (US)

Sunny Colarado - '06 Chevrolet Colarado WT
90 day: 24.18 mpg (US)

cbr250s - '12 Honda cbr250
90 day: 115.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
OK so this means that my cam timing is retarded, what will that mean for my FE. I am running the engine at lower than normal rpms for any given speed, and it runs slightly hotter than normal. it also has a hard time starting in cold temperatures. will bringing the cam timing back to stock timing help with any of these issues? will it be likely to increase power or FE? either would probably be a good thing.

Last edited by bschloop; 01-30-2013 at 10:09 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 05:06 AM   #56 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East coast of Australia
Posts: 393

Yella Peril - '80 Mercedes 240D sedan
Thanks: 15
Thanked 41 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bschloop View Post
I have seen the honda streamliner, and the simple. they are both great vehicles, and there are many other excellent examples of well built streamlining, but I can't find one that is available to the general public at a reasonable price. so, I will make my own.

all flat panels is not a good design for a bike due to side wind stability issues.
Maybe flat panels are better in side winds that nicely curved ones, those smooth curves we love are perfect for generating side lift.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 08:04 AM   #57 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 304

sr185 bullet - '81 Yamaha SR185 streamliner
Team Streamliner
90 day: 96.35 mpg (US)

Sunny Colarado - '06 Chevrolet Colarado WT
90 day: 24.18 mpg (US)

cbr250s - '12 Honda cbr250
90 day: 115.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
my last fairing was mostly flat panels, and did not do as well in side winds as Craig's.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 11:34 AM   #58 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 744

redyaris - '07 Toyota Yaris
Team Toyota
90 day: 45.54 mpg (US)

Gray - '07 Suzuki GS500 F
Motorcycle
90 day: 70.4 mpg (US)

streamliner1 - '83 Honda VT500 streamliner
Motorcycle
90 day: 75.63 mpg (US)

White Whale - '12 Sprinter 2500 Cargo Van
90 day: 22.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 81
Thanked 75 Times in 67 Posts
Has any one seen any research papers on the subject of; cross wind affects on motorcycles?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 06:51 PM   #59 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 304

sr185 bullet - '81 Yamaha SR185 streamliner
Team Streamliner
90 day: 96.35 mpg (US)

Sunny Colarado - '06 Chevrolet Colarado WT
90 day: 24.18 mpg (US)

cbr250s - '12 Honda cbr250
90 day: 115.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
I have not read any papers on crosswind effects on motorcycles, but I have experienced them on a partially streamlined very light bike. the streamlining I had last year was ok in crosswinds, but worse than the stock bike (not by much). it was more stable at speed though. this year I hope to improve crosswind stability while making the bike lighter. so far, all evidence leads me to believe that a more rounded profile will increase side wind stability.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 07:44 PM   #60 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bschloop View Post
improve crosswind stability
You will want to consider the option to leave a big vent from one side of the bike to the other, located 25% of the length from the nose to vent the pressure differential that the sideways airfoil shape is trying to generate when a cross wind combines with the forward motion wind to create an angle of attack.
.
http://ecomodder.com/forum/289130-post162.html
.
I also believe that keeping the center of pressure when viewed from the side as low as possible will help, in addition to the bike's trail, to self correct by automatically leaning into the crosswinds. I've noticed most faired super sport bikes and race bikes have body work along the bottom that starts just behind the front tire and almost drags the ground under full compression. So in other words, as much side area as low to the ground as they can get.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com