Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Motorcycles / Scooters
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-17-2011, 09:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: southern, wv
Posts: 306

papa smurf - '81 pickup 4wd dlx long bed 1/2 ton
90 day: 17.6 mpg (US)

Heep - '011 Grand cherokee Larado x 4x4
90 day: 19.92 mpg (US)

Old toy - '81 Cm400e

Da bike - '06 Shadow Vlx deluxe
90 day: 50.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
tire wear

whats worse under inflated or over inflated?

i already replace a dunlop k571 after 4000-4200 miles and it was bald.
now my front tire was under inflated by 6-8lbs and is half worn( just pumped it up)

i got rear at 40psi on metzler marathon 880
i got front at 30psi on maxxis touring


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2011 Jeep grandcherokee larado x v6 4x4. (wifes/weekender)
98 taco base 4x4 i4 toyota bought back due to a rust spot. gone but not forgotten.
81 toyota 4wd long bed 1/2 ton
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 10:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 569

redyaris - '07 Yaris
Team Toyota
90 day: 47.98 mpg (US)

Gray - '07 GS500 F
Motorcycle
90 day: 70.4 mpg (US)

KLR - '07 KLR650
Last 3: 62.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 45 Times in 41 Posts
If I assume that over and under inflation is with respect to manufactures recommendation, and that you do not go above the maximum marked on the tire sidewall, then under inflation will increase rolling resistance and if you go low enough you will encounter handling/steering problems. If you go above manufacturers recommendations then the rolling resistance will go down and the fuel consumption will go down [more mpg] as well...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 10:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: WI
Posts: 185
Thanks: 14
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
As I understand it, low pressures give more resistance and build more heat because the tire will buckle more as it contacts the road.

I'd be careful over-inflating cycle tires though.


Jay
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 01:34 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 1,362

The Q - '02 Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 331
Thanked 183 Times in 127 Posts
UNder inflation is worse.

I run 46psi (nitrogen) on my tires. I get 35-38000 miles uot of them.
When I first got the car 5 yrs ago I ran 32 like a good boy. I got 40,000.
For the improved mileage I'm more than happy.

(but, yhat on a car)
__________________
ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First, Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Second, Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

third, rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip! http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 06:44 AM   #5 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 386
Thanks: 0
Thanked 76 Times in 61 Posts
It's interesting that you titled this thread "Tire Wear", then ask about inflation pressure with out refering to wear in your question.

I think you'll find that there is an optimum value for inflation pressure that maximizes tire wear, but there are other consideratiuons such as ride quality, traction, handling, impact resistance, etc. that will have different values - and that may change what you think might be best.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 10:04 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
alvaro84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fehérvárcsurgó, Hungary
Posts: 240

Teresa - '04 F650CS
Motorcycle
90 day: 81.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Well, a rear tire often wears much faster than a front. It's the case with my Heidenau K73 pair, of which I had to replace the rear after 10250km (6370mi) (almost reached the wear mark at the 80k maintenance) while the front looks pretty new, the 2nd rear may wear earlier than this front.

With the Metzeler Z6s it was different, they got worn at the same pace, they were replaced together at 28000km (17400mi).

As a rule of thumb, rear wears faster on a stronger bike, and it also wears faster with more weight on it. My Teresa (650cc 50hp single, used mostly <4000rpm) is not too hungry compared to many other bikes today, yet half of that 10250km was 2-up which may count.

I always inflate the tires more than BMW recommends, sidewall max at most (2.9bars with the Z6s and 2.5/2.7 with these K73s).
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 10:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: southern, wv
Posts: 306

papa smurf - '81 pickup 4wd dlx long bed 1/2 ton
90 day: 17.6 mpg (US)

Heep - '011 Grand cherokee Larado x 4x4
90 day: 19.92 mpg (US)

Old toy - '81 Cm400e

Da bike - '06 Shadow Vlx deluxe
90 day: 50.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
I was told I was running to much air. 40psi. When it recommends 35-36 psi (rear) that is y my dunlops wore so fast. I still say it was a soft tire.
About 10% of my riding maybe less is 2 up.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2011 Jeep grandcherokee larado x v6 4x4. (wifes/weekender)
98 taco base 4x4 i4 toyota bought back due to a rust spot. gone but not forgotten.
81 toyota 4wd long bed 1/2 ton
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com